Now all living things are the result of evolution, right?

If you're going to take the baccalaureate, all living things today are the result of evolution.

And this evolution must be explained by Darwin's theory of evolution.

The following can be learned as extracurricular knowledge).

But in reality, the theory of evolution has its own limitations, and it does not fully explain the entire evolutionary process. For example, creatures in the deep sea basically have no eyes or have very poor eye function. But the presence or absence of eyes affects an organism so much that individuals with eyes are eliminated, and evolution cannot give a definitive answer.

So, while the theory of evolution is very rejective of the theory of "enter and fall", it cannot fully prove the latter to be false.

Our approach to education makes us believe in everything we learn. But that's what science is like, and there's never an absolutely accurate answer. The so-called axioms are constantly excluding all kinds of them"No way"After that, people subjectively think"That's right"products.

And when will we get a complete paradox to refute these"Axiom", although unknown, is not impossible. Geocentrism is the simplest example.

What is the end result of biological evolution? Does a post-biological universe really exist? ]["The Postbiological Universe"What does it mean].

If it is a general examination, this sentence is correct, and it can be combined with the definition of biological evolution.

Of course, it is the result of evolution, all living things change with the change of the environment, if you can't adapt to the environment, you will only be eliminated, this world is very cruel.

It's a judgment explanation question, and it's the wrong way to say that "evolution" should be changed to "natural selection," and I remember taking the exam as well.

I'm afraid not, in the true sense of the word.

If you are still taking the entrance examination, it means that your difficulty should be understood in a general sense, and it is related to your book knowledge, so you can answer "right".

Evolution depends on whether gene frequencies change.

Modern organisms also live in a variety of complex environments, and they should evolve absolutely, but captive organisms, such as laying hens and grazing sheep on the grasslands, have less environmental changes and evolve more slowly.

It's okay to be anxious, but be polite, classmate.

The argument of natural selection is more exploratory.

Evolution means that it is necessary to improve itself.

Look at many examples, like butterflies with large concentric circles.

It will be more able to intimidate predators who want to eat it.

But is this the evolution of butterflies because they want to have big eyes because they are afraid of being eaten?

Perhaps mutations can explain this result.

Through natural selection, the dominant ones survive.

Deep-sea creatures don't need sight, but rely more on other senses.

Relatively speaking, organisms that rely on the eyes become vulnerable, and this is an environmental problem.

It's not just a comparison of the argument that those who have eyes are advantageous.

Darwin's Theory of Biological Evolution.

Modern Theory of Biological Evolution.

That's right, those who don't evolve have long been eliminated.

No. is the result of natural selection.

Darwin believed that the process of natural selection is a long-term, slow, continuous process Because the struggle for survival is continuous, so natural selection is also continuous, through the selection of the living environment from generation to generation, species variation is directed to accumulate in one direction, so the traits are gradually different from the original ancestors, so that new species are formed Because the environment in which organisms are located is diverse, therefore, the ways in which organisms adapt to the environment are also diverse, so, Through natural selection, biological diversity has been formed, so biological evolution is the result of natural selection

So the answer is: natural selection.

The reasons for the evolution of organisms are as follows:

1. The tendency of organisms to overreproduce and the limited resources cause a struggle between biological individuals.

2. The heritability of general differences and variations between biological individuals has resulted in individuals with favorable variations having more opportunities to survive and leave to future generations.

3. Favorable mutations gradually accumulate, and organisms continue to evolve into new types.

Evolution: Also known as evolution, in biology refers to the change of genetic traits in a population from generation to generation. The so-called trait refers to the expression of genes, in the process of reproduction, genes will be replicated and passed on to offspring, mutations in genes can change traits, and then cause genetic variation between individuals.

Creature. Some people think that living things are living things, and all living things are living things, then, on the other hand, whether living objects are all living things, the answer is no. Because not only living things have life, but also a part of living things can have life, for example, a green leaf, a heart to be transplanted, red blood cells and white blood cells in blood.

However, these living objects do not think that they belong to living things, so living objects are not necessarily living things. So, how should the concept of living things be defined? We found that animals are made up of each specific person, pigs, tigers, sparrows, mosquitoes, etc.

Thus, the animal itself is a collection of objects, and in the same way, plants, microorganisms, and living things are all collections of objects, and therefore, we can define living beings in terms of the concept of sets.