Why do many debate tournaments make the mistake of binary opposition in their topics?

That's right.

If on a different basis.

Of course, it becomes a matter of saying things to each other.

But there are pros and cons to the debate.

If the topic is in favor of one party.

Then the other side will inevitably pull the debate in his favor.

Relative to you becomes a disadvantage.

If the debate is about justice and justice.

Then just judge one side according to justice and justice, so why argue?

Debating is not about who is right.

It's about training reaction tact, on-the-spot performance, and competing for the main axis of the problem.

How to find opponent vulnerabilities so that opponents are irrefutable.

Isn't your argument a matter of what is right or wrong at a glance? Isn't that kind of debate more pointless!

Debate is a gentleman's activity, the purpose of which is not to judge the truth of a sentence or an opinion, but to improve one's ability, expand one's thinking, or prove oneself through the preparation of debates, through debating.

Winning the debate does not mean that the victorious side is right. If you play against a stronger team, the winner may still win, so you should see the debate as an opportunity to prove yourself and show yourself, rather than as a way to judge right and wrong.

Everything that grows up without setbacks cannot withstand the test of time and wind and rain.

The most important difference between humans and advanced animals is to think about right and wrong, good and bad, and so on.

If people's minds are all looking at the problem from one angle, the consequences will be serious.

After saying that an angle has been set (right is right, right is wrong), then the outcome of the debate is decided.

The purpose of the debate competition is to gain the true meaning of both the pros and cons, and at the same time to self-examine.

However, I think you are confused about the basic meaning of your debate and analysis.

Debate is a battlefield.

Analysis is tactical.

The purpose of the debate is to prove that one's own point of view is right, so we must do everything possible to use everything available to explain the correctness of one's own point of view and the error of the other party's point of view, so when there are only two sides of the debate, the point of view will naturally become a binary opposite, the same reason, if there is a third party, a fourth party at this time, then the point of view will become ternary, quaternary and so on, so this mainly depends on the object of the debate There are several parties.

The significance of debate lies in the fact that debate trains logical thinking ability and language skills, and it is not a philosophical discussion, and the starting point of the two is different.

There must be two sides to a heated debate, and there are two sides to everything. It is precisely because there are pros and cons on both sides that the arguments of the participants can be more revealed.

Debate is not discussion.

The purpose of the debate competition is not to have a result, but to test the debater's logical thinking ability, adaptability, language expression ability, etc., and debate is just a formality.

Oh, debate. It's just a game of language. You play it like a game. And don't let it be played.

The most common mistakes made in general debate competitions are the following.

1. Excessive emotion and lack of etiquette.

2. Too nervous, the language loses its logic, and the slips of the tongue are frequent.

3. Deviating from the core debate, entangled in small points, and ignoring the main line.

The above are low-level mistakes, and the following are high-level strategic mistakes.

4. The offensive is too strong and domineering, which makes the judges resistant.

5. Just targeted each other everywhere and said that the other party had no words, but did not convince the judges and the audience. (The core task of the debate is to convince the judges).

6. The language is gorgeous enough but the logic is insufficient, and many logical errors have been singled out.

7. The logic is too thorough, so that the audience and judges can't figure out your logic in a limited time.

8. The free debate time arrangement is unreasonable, leaving a long time for the other party to freely refute.

9. When debating, you only face each other and do not face the audience and judges.

will be led by the other party's nose, there will be loopholes caught by the other party, there will be chaos, all the time around the examples proposed by the other party, too nervous, the language is out of logic, frequent slips of the tongue, insufficient logic, and no convincing judges. Etcetera.

There will be a digression while talking, make all preparations in advance!

1 The second type of erroneous perception is called side-viewing, which means the idea of relativity. The opposite of me is a person, the opposite of the big is the small, and the opposite of the long is the short, this is a misconception. Let's think about it, which of the six realms of beings does not live in a relative concept?

It's going to be hard to figure this out.

2 Relative is two, Dharma is not the Dharma, and two is not the Dharma. The Buddha said that the second is a wrong concept, and the second is not a correct concept. This question, in the Mahayana Sutra, you have to study and experience it in depth and carefully, and if you really have to understand the only way, then it is very fortunate that you can understand that it is enlightenment, and you will see through it.

3 After seeing through, you must really put down the two, that is, the two sides must be put down; After you let go of the two sides, you enter the only dharma, which is the one true dharma realm. As long as there are two, you decide to be in the Six Realms, in the Ten Dharma Realms, and you can't enter the One True Dharma Realm.

4 For a true practitioner, the mind is pure, and the pure mind is one; Second, the heart is not pure. There are people and me, there are right and wrong, how can the heart be pure? How is it possible to be equal? We talk about the real practice, and we will see you here.

Everything is one, this is what we are.

The second question, for example, when you do something wrong and punish you, is it love or hate?

The so-called non-dual method is the core idea of Mahayana Buddhism, but it is only the words of one sect of Buddhism. For Theravada Buddhism, believing in the doctrine of non-duality is tantamount to clinging to heretical views, and the doctrine of non-duality will lead to the inability to attain fruition, let alone save oneself, let alone save sentient beings.

Questions like this tell you about the unreliability of world thinking.

To practice is like when you are faced with a new thing, but what empirical evidence this thing can bring to you is the truth.

Isn't that how the Buddha came?

Schools should hold debate competitions, and the topic should be small mistakes, not big mistakes. I don't agree with this view, because small mistakes, if not taken seriously, can accumulate over time and lead to big mistakes. From a positive point of view, small mistakes do not make big mistakes, because everyone makes mistakes, and small mistakes do not make big mistakes.

The impact of the Internet on college students.

Outweigh the disadvantages The impact of the Internet on college students can do more harm than good.

Loose management does more harm than good for college students Loose management does more harm than good for college students.

It's easy to get along with each other, it's hard to fall in love, it's easy to get along with each other.

The web is more entertaining than practical The web is more practical than entertaining.

Those who have achieved great things are not informal, and those who have achieved great things are also informal.

The education of love is more effective than corporal punishment Corporal punishment is more effective than the education of love.

Cooperation is more capable of making civilization progress than competition is more capable of making civilization progress than cooperation.

The Key to Young Talent's Success Is Their Own Ability The key to young people's success is external opportunities.

Foreign Civilization Does More Harm Than Good to Chinese Civilization Foreign civilization has done more harm than good to Chinese civilization.

Exams are required to discover talents, and exams are not required to discover talents.

Debate essays can be written about the benefits of living fast as well as the implications.

Today's Chinese society is indeed facing various problems such as modernization and aging. On the one hand, after nearly 40 years of rapid development, the economic structure needs to be adjusted and the economic momentum needs to be switched; On the other hand, the rapid aging of the age structure of the population has also brought about various problems in social security and psychological adjustment.

If we fail to make corresponding adjustments in the process of social transformation, the anxiety of facing the pressures of life and the resistance to a happy life may indeed spread, and it is easy to shrink back and turn to a relatively easy and slow life. However, have you ever considered that as long as we are in society, we have to face all kinds of pressures, avoiding problems will not solve anything, and wanting to live a slower life does not mean that we should do this?

Moreover, what you think is that the great pressure is caused by the development of modern society is not necessarily related to the faster attitude we advocate. When we say faster, we mean to be a little more aggressive in the original state, which is a positive attitude towards life. How to maintain the vigor and vigor of life struggle and national development is a problem that we need to solve together.

Looking at our discussion around fast and slow life from this perspective, we have not come to a pessimistic and helpless conclusion, but precisely the vigilance of our society to slowness, stagnation, and depression. In fact, today's Chinese will feel that they are busy and feel that countless fleeting opportunities are coming. But for most people, complaining that "China is too fast" does not prevent us from taking action.

In society, pressure is everywhere, and learning how to deal with pressure is exactly the training that everyone must go through to adapt to society. Chinese people who want to "roll up their sleeves and work hard" have not only anxiety, but also a power to always race against the clock. The predecessors planted trees, and the descendants enjoyed the shade.

It must be admitted that our society is not developed enough to carry so many good lives.

Debates are controversial topics, depending on what aspects. I'm generally inclined to the mean, and I don't think anything is too much.