After the Greco Persian War, why didn t Persia engage in some hoplites?

Updated on history 2024-04-27
19 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Because of this Greco-Persian war, both sides were greatly affected, and the national strength was empty, and it was impossible to build it in a short time.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    The main thing is that the technology is not good, if the technology is advanced, they will not be a heavy army, and they can also prepare a more powerful army.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    After the war, everything needs to be recuperated from scratch, and there is no way to engage those hoplites in a short time.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    After the Greco-Persian Wars, the Persian army had a great impact, so it was difficult for them to develop hoplites.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Persia definitely wants to engage in hoplites, but the strength is not good, and there is money for hoplites there just after the war.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Persia was also hit hard after the Greco-Persian War, and it was impossible to develop hoplites in a short period of time. And they also did not consider hoplites useful.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The elite of the Persian army was the "immortal squad" of 10,000 men, the guard of the Persian king, all of whom consisted of Persians. If any of the soldiers of this unit died or became vacant due to illness, a new soldier was immediately sent to replace them, so that "they were never more or less than 10,000 men." There is reason to believe that this 10,000-strong "immortal squad" was the standing army of the Persian Empire.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Because at that time, the main reason was that the conditions were not good, and if the conditions could, I felt that I would dare to try a nuclear bomb.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Although the hoplite has a great role to some extent, he also has one of his disadvantages, so he didn't do it.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The hoplites required great organizational discipline and the courage to engage in shock combat face to face with the enemy, which could only be done by propertied citizen soldiers. How many of the Persian slave armies could face the phalanx spears? It's that hoplites can't fight from a distance, haven't you read Xenophon's expedition?

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    1. The reasons for the final defeat of Persia in the Greco-Persian Wars.

    1. The root cause: too little to underestimate the enemy, and the labor expedition.

    It can be seen from the three campaigns of the Persian invasion of Greece that the fundamental reason for the defeat of the Persian Empire was that it was too light on the enemy, and the long-distance journey led to a decline in combat effectiveness.

    2. Stubborn resistance from the Greek army.

    Although the Persian army was strong, they did not know much about the Greek army, and it can be said that they knew themselves rather than "know their opponents". Another point is "geographical advantage", Greece is in a dangerous terrain, easy to defend and difficult to attack, and several naval battles in which Persia took the initiative to attack were completely defeated by Greece by skillfully using the terrain. Among them, the Battle of Salamis was the most important battle in the entire Greco-Persian War, and it turned the tide of the war.

    To sum up, it is inevitable that Persia will end up with a "belligerent and will perish".

    II. The Greco-Persian Wars and Their Historical Significance.

    1. The Greco-Persian War was a war in which the ancient Persian Empire invaded Greece in order to expand its territory, and the war ended with Greece winning and Persia defeated. The Greco-Persian War was the first large-scale international war between Europe and Asia in the history of the world. The war lasted for nearly half a century, and as a result, the Greek city-states and institutions survived, while the Persian Empire collapsed.

    2. The Greco-Persian War was a collision between the Persian Empire in the East and the Greek city-states in the West, and it was also an important conflict between the early Eastern and Western civilizations. The Greco-Persian Wars broke the gap between Western countries and allowed Greek civilization to flourish and become the foundation of Western civilization. From the perspective of promoting social development and progress, this is the historical significance of the Greco-Persian War.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    the reasons for the defeat of Persia in the Greco-Persian Wars; First, the strength of the Greek army was underestimated, and large corps assault tactics were used. Second, the Persian legions did not have new tactics to crack the flexible tactics of Greece. In short, Persia was defeated by the military system, just as the Soviet Union was defeated by the development system.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The reasons for the strategic mistake are very large, such as the lone soldier rushing forward, the geographical advantage, the commander's underestimation of the enemy, and the weakness of the navy.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    The War of Ancient Greece and Persia.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    It is said that in 499 BC, Darius I, known as the "Iron and Blood Emperor", ordered the Persian army to attack Greece after successfully seizing the Indus Valley.

    This was the first great collision of Eastern and Western civilizations in the history of the world - the Greco-Persian War.

    The war had a great impact on the economies and cultures of the East and the West, and its significance was far greater than the war itself.

    The first stage of the Greco-Persian War.

    In 492 BC, Darius I sent 25,000 men from Mardonius to advance into Greece.

    Tragically, the Persian fleet was destroyed by the hurricane before it could see the enemy.

    The land was also attacked by the Thracians and was forced to retreat.

    After two years of rest, Darius I sent his troops to attack again, doubling his strength.

    This time it went straight to the plain of Marathon, about 40 kilometers northeast of Athens.

    Athens rushed to the aid of Sparta and organized 10,000 hoplites to fight the Persian army in the plain of Marathon.

    As a result, the Persian army was defeated both by land and sea.

    At the Battle of Marathon, 192 Athenians were killed, while the Persian army lost 6,400.

    It has created a classic example in the history of ancient warfare in which less wins more.

    A soldier named Philippides ran as fast as he could to return to Athens to report the victory, and after the news of the victory was delivered, he fell to the ground and died.

    This is where the modern marathon comes in.

    05.The second phase of the Greco-Persian War.

    After the Battle of Marathon, the two sides went through ten years of intense preparations.

    In 480 BC, King Zexis I of New Persia, who succeeded Darius (who died in 486 BC), personally led an army of 250,000 men and 1,000 warships into Greece again.

    In the face of the Persian invaders, who claimed to have an army of millions, the city-states of Greece, which were facing a life-and-death situation, finally came together.

    In the Battle of Hot Springs, 300 Spartan warriors became famous in a battle, killing tens of thousands of enemies at the cost of 300 people.

    The disparity in strength was so great that the Persian army quickly occupied two-thirds of Greece and burned the empty city of Athens to ruins.

    The sacrifice of the Spartan army bought Athens precious time, and more than 300 warships were assembled to ambush in Salami Bay.

    Then, he successfully lured the Persian king's huge fleet of more than 600 ships into the encirclement.

    After eight hours of hard fighting, the Persian fleet was crushed and retreated with heavy losses.

    Xerxes I feared that the road would be cut off, and fled back to China in defeat.

    06.The third phase of the Greco-Persian War.

    A year later, the Persian Empire, unwilling to accept defeat, sent 50,000 troops to make a comeback.

    The decisive battle between the Greek coalition of 30,000 and the Persian army was held at Plataea.

    Once again, the Persians were repulsed.

    After that, Greece, led by Athens, began to switch from defense to offense.

    In 449 BCE, the two sides signed the Peace of Karias in the Persian capital.

    Persia relinquished control of Greece and recognized the independent status of the Greek city-states.

    The Greco-Persian wars came to an end.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Greece was not a complete country at that time, it consisted of many city-states, which looked down on each other, and the Persian attack on Greece, none of the Greek city-states could stand alone against the powerful Persian army, and the various city-states were bitterly defeated, so they were unprecedentedly united.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Looking back at the "Polish-Greek war", what exactly happened at that time? The answer is surprising!

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    The Greeks' defensive battle against the Persian invasion was barely a just war.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    aggressiveness, the rest only knew Spartan 300 warriors.

    Persia was a powerful slave state.

Related questions
10 answers2024-04-27

iPhone can't send text messages troubleshooting:

1.Make sure the signal is OK and turn off airplane mode. >>>More

19 answers2024-04-27

In history, the more famous queens, except for those who have great intentions, Liu Bang's wife and Wu Zetian are two people that everyone likes to discuss very much, after all, both of them can be said to control the rights of the entire country, but although everyone's control of power is almost the same, why is the ending different? >>>More

20 answers2024-04-27

CBA is not a professional league, semi-professional, not a completely commercial league, with the participation of the Basketball Association, and each team does not make money, except for Hongyuan, which claims to make money. So basically in all aspects can not be compared with the NBA, you can't learn the NBA, many players are professional basketball practice, from the sports institute, unlike the NBA, they are all drafted from the university, the high school league in the United States, the college league is very popular, and the players are trained at a level. Our country is much worse, the new forces of the NBA are basically all from universities, we are not, some of the people in our country's CUBA are playing professional basketball, not much, I remember a few years ago there was a Han Dejun who was the center of the championship team, it seems that he later played in the CBA. >>>More

9 answers2024-04-27

This is a historical mystery and is famous"The sound of the candle shadow axe"The incident is talking about his sons Song Taizu had four sons: >>>More

26 answers2024-04-27

In Zhen Huan's biography, the Queen Mother did not personally raise Shen Meizhuang's daughter, mainly because the Queen Mother herself was very old, and secondly, the Queen Mother knew that Shen Meizhuang's daughter did not belong to her own granddaughter, so he did not raise it personally.