When Yongzheng seized the throne, Gao Beyong gave advice with all his heart, why did Yongzheng kill

He knew too much, and the emperor should feel uncomfortable if he stayed. Only by killing can no one know about his sad past.

It must be someone who has a lot of memory. He knew the emperor too well. The emperor was afraid that he would rebel. So it's still necessary to get rid of it. The emperor's suspicions were heavy.

Gao Beyong knew what tactics and strategies Yongzheng used when he seized the throne, and once such a person leaked his mouth, he would kill Yongzheng.

In fact, many times I know that the more people who have a good relationship with them, the easier it is to harm themselves, let alone as the king of a country, so I killed him.

This is mainly a question of whether their descendants work hard, after all, Zhao Guangyi's descendants really don't have the ability to sit on the throne.

Because Yongzheng knew that Gao Beyong knew too many things about himself, and staying would be a trouble, so he killed him.

Because he knows a lot of the emperor's secrets, and these secrets are the emperor's weakness, and he must die.

Because Gao Beyong is too scheming, he can help himself achieve the throne, and naturally he can help others, and he knows too many things.

Because Gao Beyong knows many secrets of Yongzheng, and the more he knows, the faster he will die, and only the dead will not betray.

Yongzheng knew Gao Beiyong too well, and he knew that keeping this person by his side would become a time bomb sooner or later. Therefore, it is better to get rid of it quickly, and never suffer from it.

Who told you that Gao Beyong was killed? People who live in the shadows can still live in the shadows, but there is no need to depict them, this is the main drama.

Yongzheng DynastyGao Wuyong ended up being killed by Yongzheng.

Gao Beyong has been working as a housekeeper in Yongwang's Mansion, and when Yongzheng was in the palace, he had a lot of secret errands.

All of them were handed over to Gao Beyong to deal with, including Kan'er being poisoned by medicine, all of which were planned by Yongzheng and dealt with by Gao Wuyong.

Gao Wuyun knows that Yongzheng has too many secrets, and Wu Sidao, who has been giving advice to Yongzheng.

It should have ended like this, but the smart Wu Sidao finally managed to get out of Yongzheng's side, and Yongzheng, who was also at a loss, was kind and let Wu Sidao have a way out.

There is no longer a reason why Yongzheng does not need to be promoted to the palace, after all, Gao Wuyong entered the palace by himself, once he entered the palace, how to arrange the palace, and whether he would be pampered and arrogant when he entered the palace, many things need to be considered.

And Yongzheng is also worried that Gao Wuyong will be taken by the eighth elder brother.

To be bought, he did a lot of secret errands for Yongzheng, so he knew a lot of Yongzheng's secrets. Under Yongzheng's hands, he doesn't have a lot of oil and water, and he knows so many secrets, which is particularly easy to be bribed.

In fact, Yongzheng did not usurp the throne to obtain the throne, but was really passed on by Kangxi. There are many speculations about this on the Internet or in **, but they are not accurate. Among them, the most popular is that Yongzheng's subordinate Long Keduo changed Kangxi's edict of "passing on the fourteenth elder brother" to "passing on the fourth elder brother", but the "ten" in the ancient Chinese character should be written as "pick", and how to change it to "Yu"?

Therefore, the so-called argument of changing the edict to the throne is self-defeating. The same is true for most of the other statements. In fact, if you think about it carefully, the nine elder brothers of the Kangxi Dynasty are each dragons among people (I have also been cute to them for a long time), but in the last years of Kangxi, the eldest elder brother was imprisoned, the prince was deposed twice, and the third elder brother was just a literati, and the eighth elder brother was born.

The ninth elder brother and the tenth elder brother supported the eighth elder brother, the thirteenth elder brother was also imprisoned, and the fourteenth elder brother was sent to the battlefield. Some people say that Kangxi sent the fourteenth elder brother to the battlefield to enhance his prestige, but I personally think that someone would send the prince he considered to be a prince to a battlefield where he would lose his life if he was not careful? However, no one knows what the real history is, and the above is pure speculation

The posthumous Zhao was not tampered with, and Yongzheng rightfully succeeded to the throne.

Whether Emperor Yongzheng usurped the throne or not has been debated for hundreds of years, and the mystery has finally been revealed.

No, the statement that the wild history has changed the holy decree is actually not credible.

One, the edicts of the Qing Dynasty were written in Manchu, at least not only in Chinese.

Two, it is impossible to pass on the fourteenth elder brother and one horizontal into the fourth elder brother, and it is generally written as "Yu" as a preposition, and in ancient times, it was generally used as a surname, and it was very inappropriate to use it here.

No, because the Holy Decree is not written only in Chinese, it is impossible to change the Divine Decree, and people rely on strength.

This usurper and heir faction have been arguing about this issue for many years. The questions raised by the usurper faction have also been answered by the successor faction one by one, so on the whole, I don't think he has usurped the throne. Because, if Kangxi really wanted to pass the throne to the fourteenth elder brother, then he would not let the fourteenth elder brother lead the troops out to fight when he was seriously ill.

In fact, Kangxi Ye already had a candidate in mind.

Forget it about Yeshi, don't take it to heart.

In terms of realism, he did usurp the throne.

History has become a thing of the past, no matter how much you investigate it, it will always become a cloud of the past!

The mystery of history, which cannot be solved, can never be ruled out. But what you said was made up in a TV series. Emperor Yongzheng was strict in government, so the reputation was very bad, and there were many rumors, and there were many various theories about his usurpation.

But now from our point of view, at that time, the fourteenth was fighting outside, and there was no other achievement except for the military department (that is, only fighting), and the rest of the princes were either confined, or incompetent, or entangled in civil affairs, Yongzheng was the prince when he was in charge of the world's money and grain, and was actually the only person who could ascend the throne at that time.

The regime is unstable, and posterity makes it up.

There is absolutely no one in the official history, and there are all ** ingredients in it, which is not believable. Of course, history is written by people, and there are no absolutes.

Impossible, the emperor's edicts of the Qing Dynasty were all in duplicate, three languages (Mongolian, Manchu, Chinese), plus the traditional Chinese characters at that time, not simplified Chinese characters, Yu This is just a rumor spread by the Eight Masters or speculation by later generations.

Wrong Manchu and Chinese characters are not the same They can't be changed at all Those who say bad things about Yongzheng are all rumors because Yongzheng has offended too many people in his life Don't believe it I really can't see some people who say bad things about us Yongzheng Those people are idle and have nothing to do.

No. At that time, "Yu" and "Yu" could not be used together, and there was also Manchu, how to tamper with it?

It is because some of Yongzheng's policies touch the interests of intellectuals that such stories are fabricated.

Yongzheng is a dark horse, and he has been a messenger many times, which shows that Kangxi attaches great importance to him.

It's just a legend. There should be an edict in Manchu, Mongolian, and Chinese.

No, there is now a holy decree in the Manchu, Tibetan and Chinese languages, and it is not a mystery case.

The posthumous Zhao was not tampered with, and Yongzheng rightfully succeeded to the throne.

It doesn't matter whether Yongzheng usurped the throne or not, but I feel that who Kangxi wants to pass on the throne to has become a permanent fan, how simple it is to write an edict, the power is in his own hands, he can write how he wants, and the power comes out of the barrel of the gun, at that time, only the 14th brother had military power, but Yongzheng had the right to defend the Beijing garrison, Long Keduo was guarding by his side, and it was difficult to become the emperor if he didn't want to ascend the throne! Controlling the palace, what can't you do? became the emperor, the fourteenth brother thought of the rebellion, did he dare?

Will the troops listen to him? Without food **, how can so many soldiers fight? These soldiers rely on the country's best food, unless the world is in turmoil, so many provinces will not rebel against him, not so much that Yongzheng usurped the throne, it is better to say that Yongzheng fought the world!

Now arguing about changing the edict and so on, what Liaoning has issued a testament, saying that Yongzheng is right, how boring, he has seized the most critical military power, this is where he succeeds, if other princes get the support of Long Keduo, want to be the emperor, how easy it is, the emperor is a false name, and the real emperor is the gun barrel! Even if Kangxi passes the throne to the fourteenth brother and Yongzheng controls the palace, Kangxi will see Yongzheng's face, burn the edict, and write again, what a simple thing, become the emperor, slowly kill those who know, and the throne will be stable! I think this is the truth of history!

In Chinese history, emperors were born from the barrel of a gun, so many puppet emperors, there are just no guns!

I believe that it is impossible, because the Qing Dynasty was changed by the Jin people and later changed to the Manchus, so the emperor's edict had two copies - one in Manchu and one in Chinese. If in the history of the wilderness, it is not feasible to rely only on the Han book "The throne is passed on to ten (changed to) four sons", and the Qing Dynasty has long stipulated:

The edict is full and Chinese, and one less is invalid.

I don't think it's a usurpation, see below In the last years of Kangxi, he competed with other princes for the prince. After the death of the Holy Ancestor, he succeeded to the throne with the help of the Thirteenth Emperor Yinxiang. It is also rumored that with the help of Long Keduo, he seized the throne given by the Fuyuan general Yinyu.

Whether Yongzheng's succession to the throne was passed down by Kangxi or tampered with the edict to seize the heir is a controversial issue that has not yet been determined. However, most historians judge that Kangxi's edict was written in Manchu, Chinese, and Mongolian. According to the folk saying, the Chinese language was modified, but the Mongolian and Manchu languages could not be modified.

Probably not, those are wild histories, not to be believed.