CPU matching problems, CPU and motherboard matching problems

Fit, Spartak Kuroshio BA-270 I also like this board.

Spartak Kuroshio BA-270

790GX series motherboards, CPU five-phase power supply, all-solid-state capacitors, and DDR3 memory. There is nothing wrong with this motherboard with this CPU.

The 925 is still suitable with a first-line motherboard, MSI, Gigabyte 790, but it is indeed a lot more expensive, about 1000, and your motherboard is only more than 500.

Spartak Kuroshio BA-270

There is nothing wrong with this motherboard with this CPU.

1. Core i3 3220 with B75 motherboard, there is no problem, the current mainstream configuration.

2. Athlon X4 740 belongs to AMD's new generation of CPU, but its performance is not as good as the old U (X4 640) according to the evaluation of relevant software running scores, but he is a new U and has added a new instruction set. Don't look at him as a 4-core, the running score is second to Intel's dual-core G850...

3. Dilan Hengjin is a first-line manufacturer of A card, with excellent quality, Dilan HD6850 is the most cost-effective product in the thousand-yuan graphics card. In terms of performance, it can drive any large-scale 3D game.

4. I personally speak highly of ASUS and GIGABYTE, but ASUS's sub-brand ASRock, my personal opinion is that if you can, try not to use it. There are too many trolls on ASRock's website.

Summary: There is no problem with your first set of configurations, ok.

Satisfied, :)

i3 3220 with B75+ HD6850 is a more popular match, and the performance of each component is also relatively balanced, and there are no shortcomings. HD6850Although it is the graphics card of the previous generation of ATI, it is still very cost-effective as long as it is only about 800. HD7770 still has a lot of moisture at present.

A platform with X4 955 + AMD970 series motherboard should be more than 3000 host configuration, 955 super to the rear than i3 configuration performance is slightly higher, ** will also be a little lower, but the power consumption is relatively large. It costs more electricity.

You can refer to the following configuration.

CPU: AMD Phenom IIX4 955 Disc Quad Core 450

Radiator: Overclocking three Yellow Sea Deluxe Radiator 99

Motherboard: ASRock 970 Pro3 450

Like Athlon X4 740 with A75 plus HD6770 or HD7750 is generally the standard configuration of the 2000 yuan host. The performance is a notch off.

ASRock motherboard has a good reputation, high cost performance, and Yingtai is about the same as Yingtai, and it belongs to the leader of second-tier brands.

i3 3220 with B75 plus 8G memory plus 6850 is no problem. The B75 chip just has fewer features than high-end ones like the Z77, not that it can't do it.

The same is true for the 740 with the A75 motherboard.

ASRock configuration is no problem, ASRock is also one of the top 4 brands with the largest shipments in 2012, and it cannot be done without configuration guarantee. But many people still look at ASRock with old eyes, in the past, ASUS restricted ASRock only to do low-end, resulting in ASRock's poor development, now ASUS has relaxed the restrictions, ASRock development is very good, and it is currently the most cost-effective brand.

Both plans are OK, and there are no bottlenecks, i3The performance is higher, depending on your budget.

ASRock's motherboard is not bad, the low-end motherboard is not worse than ASUS, MSI's, the materials and workmanship are good, and the cost performance is very high.

If the budget is sufficient, it's better to use the Intel platform you listed.

ASRock's main plate is also good on the low end line.

In terms of performance, there is no difference between boards of the same line. To put it bluntly, the difference between first-line and second-line and third-tier manufacturers is different in the materials. There is no difference in performance. You get what you pay for.

Originally, the first choice for platform A should be AMD X4 955, but now it is generally out of stock everywhere, and it is difficult to buy, so I have to retreat to X4 740, ASRock's board is good, second only to ASUS, Gigabyte, MSI, and even the low-end board is much better than ASUS's quality (ASUS P8 H61-LE's board has been shouted by everyone in our place, and the repair rate is higher than that of Rainbow).

It's a good match. Motherboards are either the *** points of Gigabyte. Either ASRock is more affordable.

It's not bad, but the CPU personally recommends adding hundreds of blocks for 2550K is better.

This combination is still good, if you use a 3A platform, you can also look at your budget, if you want to save a little, it is not a big problem to use 3A.

A75 plus 740 plus 6850 is also very good It is better to use Huaqin than MSI Huaqin is the low-price brand of ASUS to grab the low-price market.

With the water is more serious, MSI, ASUS, and Gigabyte are all first-line brands, but MSI ** is cheaper than the other 2 in overclocking.

No overclocking, choose MSI is good.

ASUS has strong R&D capabilities and a wide range of features, and Gigabyte is cheap and affordable.

It's already the era of DDR3 workmanship.

Buy a 2G Kingston DDR3

That's fine. And it supports dual channels, which can insert two memory sticks.

Let me tell you a little trick.

Let's say you can plug in two memory sticks.

There is only one missing when making the system.

The system is installed. And so on some software installed.

Plug in the other.

Then go and run the program.

There will be some decompression on the CPU

i7 870

The first-generation i7 supports hyper-threading technology, with four cores and eight threads.

The performance is between i5 2320 and i5 2400, and there is still a big gap with the third-generation i5, and the comprehensive performance is equivalent to AMD FX8120

LGA1156 interface, it is difficult to buy new new motherboards that use this interface, and it is not supported, the memory controller is older, and the maximum only supports DDRE1333MHz memory.

The high full-load power consumption is 190W, and the third-generation i7 3770 is only around 120W at full load.

At present, the loose piece** is less than 600 yuan.

Summary: The performance is not high-end, but it is still strong, suitable for old motherboard upgrades, not for new machines.

a10 5800k

The second-generation APU flagship, dual module and four threads, four cores and four threads.

The overall performance is equivalent to that of the second-generation i3 2120 or the Yilong X4 955, with no lock-on multiplier and better performance after overclocking.

Socket FM2 interface, this motherboard is still in order, supported, and the memory controller supports DDR3 up to 1866MHz memory.

High full-load power consumption, but compared to the latest Core i, it is not high in the AMD family.

Built-in high-spec core graphics card, with DDR3 1866MHz performance equivalent to NVIDIA GeForce GT630 graphics card.

At present, the boxed ** is about 750 yuan.

Summary: The performance is not bad, not as good as i7 870, not suitable for mid-to-high-end platforms, because the integrated high-spec core graphics card has a super high cost performance, but if you don't want a core graphics card, there is no need to choose this.

No need to integrate graphics CPU recommendation (motherboard chipset interface + CPU).

Cost-effective platform: B75+Intel Pentuim G2020 Socket AM3+Athlon X4 750K

Cost-effective performance platform: H77+E3 1230 V2 socket AM3+Yilong 6 cores and 1100T

Cost-effective top performance platform: x79+i7 3930k

Neither is chosen.

i7 870 is the first generation of i7 motherboards, which need to use the 5 series, and now all of them are discontinued, and they can only be bought in 2 hands, and there may not be good ones.

The 5800K is the main feature of the APU, and its integrated graphics card performance can reach the level of the discrete HD6570 DDR3.

Those who don't need a graphics card can be considered.

If you add a discrete graphics card, you don't need to use an APU

Neither of them. You buy these 2 and it's about to be eliminated a few years ago, and the CPU without K is better than buying about 1250 E3 1230 v2 to kill these 2 directly. Just look at the CPU ladder rankings for yourself.

The two series, if it is cost-effective, still depends on the motherboard you match** add up to be practical.

The question is simple! i7 870 is old and unspeakable, and the interface is not mainstream! A10-5800K architecture is too poor, poor performance, poor power consumption control, and poor disk memory performance! Neither CPU is worth choosing!

This configuration is positioned as rudimentary, and it can basically play LOL smoothly at the highest image quality, but for playing large stand-alone and online games, the performance is not enough.

1. AMD 760K performance is slightly better than the Besturn G3220, much weaker than the i3 4130, but enough to cope with medium-sized games.

2. The performance of Sapphire R7 240 is weaker than GT740 or GTX650, equivalent to GT640, for playing games, the performance is very average, it is recommended to change to GT740 or at least R7 250 is much better.

3. The requirements for large-scale games and design are particularly high, and the memory 4G is sufficient, but you can choose the memory of better brands such as ADATA and Kingston if you have the conditions.

4. The hard disk depends on personal needs, as far as this configuration is concerned, it is completely possible to use the mechanical hard disk, and it is a way to save the budget.

Overall, except for the graphics card, the matching of various accessories is quite reasonable, and the game performance is very average.

AMD CPUs recommend using tower heat pipes.

The graphics card is too painful, it is better to buy HD6770 1G GDDR5

In terms of floating-point computing power, Intel's processors generally only have two floating-point execution units, while AMD's processors are generally designed with three parallel floating-point execution units, so among the processors of the same grade, the floating-point computing power of AMD processors is better than that of Intel's processors. It has strong floating-point arithmetic capabilities, which is advantageous for game applications and 3D processing applications. In addition, in terms of multi-** instructions, Intel has developed the SSE instruction set, which has now developed to SSE3, and AMD has also developed a corresponding, SSE-compatible enhanced 3D

now！Instruction set. In contrast, Intel's processor is slightly better than AMD's in terms of multi-instruction, and there are many software verticals that are optimized for SSE, so in multi-** software and plane processing software, compared with AMD processors of the same grade, Intel's CPU appears to have more advantages.

In the end, do you choose AMD or Inte's CPU? From the above, it can be understood that AMD's CPU has advantages over Intel's processors of the same grade in three-dimensional production, game applications, and processing, while Intel's CPU has advantages in commercial applications, multi-applications, and graphic design. In addition to the use, it is also necessary to consider the cost performance.

In this way, you can choose the most suitable CPU according to your actual use and capital budget.