Which master tells me which is better, Fujifilm A175 or Patriot 1018?

Fuji is much more cost-effective than the Patriot.

And the imaging effect should be better.

Fuji has a history of 100 years.

It's only been a few years since the patriots.

Unless you give up better quality in order to support domestic products.

Otherwise, there is no reason to choose the Patriot.

Fujifilm A175 is better, Patriot does not have core technology, does not do well in digital cameras, and the imaging effect is poor.

There is no difference between low-end machines and I seriously despise those who discriminate against domestic products and use them myself.

Fujifilm's camera is not proud of anything, and I am embarrassed to say that there is so much noise in the super CCD.

If it's cost-effective, it's definitely Patriot, there's no doubt about that. Japanese companies are very grouped, before there was no Patriot camera when the Japanese camera in China was basically in a monopoly position, in China's Japanese digital camera is much more expensive than similar Japanese products, until the first week of the Patriot camera, the Japanese camera collective price reduction of 1000-1500 yuan. It is also because of the price reduction of Japanese cameras, the local sales volume of Shide Patriot cameras has not been very good, and it has lost tens of millions every year since then.

However, in 08 the Patriot camera turned a profit.

Electronic products like digital cameras, in fact, the key is to look at your quality, your technology, your performance, your picture quality, the most important thing is cost performance, if you really can't do it, you will only shout slogans, then you can cheat for a while, you can't cheat for a lifetime. As for the turnaround of the Patriot camera, it has nothing to do with the Chinese people at all, and it mainly depends on the hot sales in Europe and the United States to have such an effect. Talents from Europe and the United States, whether you are produced in Japan or made in China, as long as you have good performance and high cost performance, people will buy yours.

This is very different from those in China who praise Japanese products and treat Chinese manufacturing as garbage, and they are called pragmatic people.

In fact, in terms of digital camera technology, Aigostar is indeed inferior to the Japanese, but only in terms of card machine and cost performance, Aigo's camera will not only not lag behind, but also be much stronger than it, which is a Chinese brand that has just started digital cameras is something to be proud of.

Of course, the above is simply from the comparison of a product to see which one is good, if you also add patriotic feelings and support the rise of national brands in the sense of patriotism, patriot is your best choice.

The Patriot's camera sucks, don't think about it, I just used it, don't think about it.

Buy a Canon or Sony according to your budget, Fujifilm's consumer cameras are also very average.

As far as the matter is concerned, the domestic camera really can't catch up with the Japanese system, the core technology is not in the hand, the card machine is selected in the Canon Panasonic Oba Fuji,,Nikon SLR is good。 But I'm not impressed by Nikon's cards. Sony is just good-looking, and most girls like it, but the imaging is average, and those who buy Samsung are laymen, but it's actually a toy.

Patriot stuff is good, I just bought the v1018 not long ago and it feels better than the Fuji and Sony that my colleague bought! Good value for money!

I like Fujifilm some of the Fujifilm Z100 I bought in the first half of the year for more than 1300 points.

This machine is an upgraded version of A100, and one more intelligent scene recognition suggests that you look at A225, which is the same as A175 with 200W pixels more than A200W pixels, so**Almost.

Imaging below 1000 can be recommended.

Samsung ES60 1200W Pixel 980 Stand-alone BenQ L1050 1000W 880 Stand-alone Fujifilm Z31 1000W 960 Standalone.

If you take the liberty of saying it, you can't see it. If you barely say it, Fuji's should be slightly better.

Patriot, Sanyo and Samsung, are brands that can never be chosen, by the way, there are Tianyu, Casio.

In fact, you can take a look again, there should be a better choice, don't patronize the appearance, Canon, Fuji have cheap.

I haven't studied the machine at this price, but a few basic points: 1. Lithium battery 2. The brand must not be a few of the ones I said above 3. The LCD screen is best 230,000 pixels 4. The camera pixel does not have to be considered at all, more than 3 million.

Without.

Just looking at the pixels doesn't mean it's good.

The so-called giveaways cannot be listed in the standard of good or bad.

There are many indicators for camera evaluation.

With what you wrote, you can only look at the brand, Fuji's good point.

brand words. Fuji is a little better.

Online is indeed cheaper than brick-and-mortar stores.

Tao Gai Banquet Treasure**.

Fujifilm A175 with invoice (1 year nationwide) Kingston 2GB SD card (5 year warranty) + inch LCD film High Speed SD Card Reader 769

The more than 600 you said should be played by the merchant in order to attract the attention of buyers.

Many of them lie that it is the price of a single machine, the price of a prototype

However, Bright Wisdom is usually not available for purchase at the list price.

**Also look at the ** in the description.

You're already cheap to buy in a physical store.

And if there is an after-sales problem.

It's also easier to solve than the online shopping.

This machine is an entry-level model.

It has been able to basically meet the daily use.

It is an indisputable fact that Nikon's card machine is not as good as Fuji, so you don't have to worry about it all the time, Fuji's card player is quite cost-effective. The A175 was released this summer, and there is enough for families.

The Fujifilm A175 camera is treated with a matte process, with fine workmanship and a very good feel, making shooting more comfortable and stable. The size of the whole machine is 93 60, equipped with an inch 230,000 pixel display, the display effect is not early, and it is often good. The Fujifilm A175 uses a 10.2 million effective pixel CCD sensor, has a 3x optical zoom, uses a focal length equivalent to 32mm-96mm of a 35mm camera, and has a sensitivity of ISO1600, so you can take happy smiles even at night or in dim rooms.

The Fujifilm A175 is equipped with a panoramic function that makes it easy to shoot impressive panoramas**. It supports intelligent scene recognition and has a double anti-shake function, allowing you to stay away from blur and shake while pressing the shutter, and always ensure that the best you shoot is clear and abnormal, powered by 2 No. 5 batteries. In terms of appearance,Fujifilm A175Continuation of the classic model of the A series,There is not much difference from the previous appearance,The fuselage is simple and compact,Simple and generous,The right side is bulging due to the use of two No. 5 batteries,The thinnest part of the left side is,It feels good,People can't put it down。

The size of the whole machine is about 120g. The back of the fuselage is equipped with an LCD display that is inch-inch, with clear display and excellent picture quality.

I bought it in '09 for 890 yuan, and I didn't use it for more than a year before it broke down, and I took less than 500 photos.