Can the CPU of the E6500 drive the 7750?

Yes, the e6500 can basically drive, but your power supply is too reluctant.

7750 power consumption 50W, your configuration +7750, the maximum power consumption of the host 170W, can barely be brought.

It is recommended that you buy a new rated 400-450W power supply, which is convenient for future upgrades, power supply, no problem with 2-3 generations of computers, power supply is the most critical hardware related to the life of computer hardware, we must pay attention to the power supply.

In addition, to change the power supply, it is recommended to choose a 7770 599 yuan graphics card (85W power consumption), the performance is 40% higher than that of 7750, and the cost performance is the highest.

Let's start with the graphics card. The performance of the HD7750 can bring out at least 90% of the space. 100% play is not because your motherboard is, and the HD7750 is, the bottleneck of the graphics card itself is not the CPU anymore, but the motherboard.

However, less than 10% of this bottleneck is nothing.

You actually come across a lot of games when HD7750 passes. It won't get stuck, but your E6500 won't be up to par.

In the same way, if you encounter a game that does not eat U, the E6500 can handle the game, HD7850 will not cause more than a bottleneck that drags down the performance of the graphics card by more than 10%.

This is the so-called bottleneck, for example, Battlefield 4, the limit of HD7750 is enough to be able to open three special effects. And your CPU will get stuck with even the lowest special effects when there are many people, and you will fail. Got it?

For another example, you play Call of Duty 6 and don't eat the old game. Enough to be able to turn on the full special effects. The performance of the HD7750 passes, and so does the E6500. 、

As for the power supply, the landlord just did what the friend upstairs said, and the standby power consumption of 220W can barely be brought. And playing games is full of power consumption! You also have to at least rate it above 300w to be insured.

The power supply is not expensive, don't be greedy for such cheapness, you really don't want to change the power supply, just remove the optical drive.

Depending on what kind of CPU it is, it can usually be identified from the following aspects: a production batch.

True: The word is made of a special process, the font is engraved in black, slightly depressed, the character strokes can not be metal (such as keys, etc.) fakes: polish some fake clock codes, so this batch will be destroyed, usually made with black lacquer printing, is meaningless depression, and can be metal objects scraping some fakes not the same hands in this coding clock**:.

The printing process is not a little the same as the cpu polishing tile is a dark gray and a little dark green fake: because this code remark must be removed later, so here is the focus of polishing. Prints from the uneven thickness of the crub tiles on the sides of the uneven thickness of the cpu are raised in blue and white, there are traces of sanding, and the printing from the uneven thickness of the floor tiles (partially grinded, only about a quarter of a millimeter thick, needs to be carefully identified) is generally polished black lacquer print, which is meaningless depression and can be scraped with the metal of the word.

3 Number of cores: ...

4 package number. 5. Aluminum cover.

id**:

Intel and AMD's CPUs have only one ID**, which is a chaotic square pattern, **thanks to the etching process, the pattern of each small dot is clearly visible, and the structured pattern is fake: because later polished or remarked, the pattern changes dramatically, and some of the dots are mixed together and difficult to discern.

7. Voltage identification:.

8 Clock Markers:

Authenticity: Clock labels and other printing is the same groove shape, the font is clear fake: some K6-2 only polish the number of this part, so there are also traces of carving here, and depression Some CPUs use metal tin to infuse the original number, reproduce the new sense of numbers, this new font engraves the original font slightly different, the strokes are blurred and the colored metal tin is significantly brighter than aluminum.

Through the windows logo certification has the windows logo, the text and certification of the window design are clearly recognizable Microsoft fakes: the window pattern is blurred, the trick is combined, Microsoft and Windows words, especially the small font is blurred, it is difficult to determine.

10. Registered trademarks.

True: All products have CCIB certification and registered trademarks.

Negative squared. 12 aluminum lid indentation.

Authenticity on both sides: the aluminum lid is made to be cut off by ingots, and when mounted on both sides, there will be a looming 4 indented fakes: if you change the aluminum cover, because it is made of injection pressure, so there are no indentations on both sides.

13. Aluminum cover viscose.

**: Viscose slightly transparent milky white color, glue only, glue point structure in the four corners of the rear aluminum cover, wheel, aluminum cover and tile parallel false: if the aluminum cover is polished, then glued, glue color yellow or blue-white, plastic dots irregular, even some CPU combined aluminum cover and tile not parallel, side low high end (very slight difference, it has been a trial micrometer to measure).

14 pieces of porcelain on both sides.

Authenticity: uniform skin tone, dark gray, slightly dark green, consistent in thickness throughout the fake: due to polishing reasons, some places pale, sanded off, due to the original roughness of the digital, so the inconsistency of the thickness of the four corners. 。

Then go to 750, E6500 is not even as good as G1620 anyway.

The two CPUs are Intel's products, and the differences are: 1. Brand: Core 2 dual-core E6700, Pentium dual-core E5800.

2. Production process: 65 nm, 45 nm.

3. CPU frequency:

4. External frequency: 266MHz, 200MHz

5. Frequency doubling: 9 times, 16 times.

6. Bus frequency: 1066MHz, 800MHz7, core code: Conroe, Wolfdale8, CPU architecture: Core, EM64T

To summarize from the above: the difference lies in the external frequency and the octaper. 5800 is 200 external frequency * 16 octave = , 6700 is 266 external frequency * 12 octave = approximately.

According to the Intel CPU bus frequency formula. The bus bit of 5800 is 200*4=800, and the bus of 6700 is 266*4=1066 approximately. In other words, when using more than 800MHz of memory, the 6700 will process data faster than the 5800

I don't feel it when I actually use it. If it's 800MHz of memory, it's not much of a difference. Moreover, the ** of these two U is basically the same.

That is, there is no noticeable gap in performance. If it's overclocking, the 5800 will be better. The external frequency is low, the frequency multiplier is large, and it is suitable for overclocking, and the 6700 overclocking will be weaker.

The external frequency is high, and the frequency doubling is small.

CPU frequency: 2660MHz Socket type: LGA 775 Production process:

65nm L2 Cache: 2MB*2 Number of cores: Dual cores Core type:

Conroe Thermal Design Power: 65WW Applicable Type: Desktop CPU Multiplier:

10x CPU external frequency: 266MHz

Good performance.

CPU E6500 and E6500K The difference between the two is that one is locked and one is not locked, and the E6500K is only listed in China, not in other countries, the following are the parameters of the two CPUs:

1. Main frequency: E6500, E6500K.

2. Frequency locked: E6500 is frequency locked, E6500K is unlocked.

3. Sales area: E6500 is global, E6500K is China.

4. Turbo frequency: E6500 is, E6500K is.

5. L2 cache: 2MB for E6500 and 2MB for E6500K.

6. Power consumption: 65W for E6500 and 65W for E6500K.

Performance-wise, the E6800 is slightly better than the E5800.

In terms of cost performance, the E5800 is a bit higher.

As can be seen from the comparison of the following parameters, in the main indicators, the L2 cache, the number of cores and the number of threads of these two CPUs are the same, and the biggest difference is in the main frequency, E6800 is, E5800 is, and after overclocking, the difference in this main frequency is almost negligible.

Of course, the E6800 is better, they have the same power consumption, and the main frequency and bus frequency of the E6800 are higher.

The e6800 has a large cache and the front-side bus 1066 is greater than the 800 of the e5800

It can support 64-bit operating systems, in general:

If the memory is less than 4G, it is recommended to install a 32-bit system;

If the RAM is 4G or higher, it is recommended to install a 64-bit system.

The difference between a 32-bit system and a 64-bit system is:

The original design intention is different:

The 32-bit operating system is designed for the average user.

Requires different configurations:

A 64-bit operating system can only be installed on a 64-bit computer (the CPU must be 64-bit). At the same time, you need to install common 64-bit software to get the best performance out of 64-bit (x64).

A 32-bit operating system can be installed on a 32-bit (32-bit CPU) or 64-bit (64-bit CPU) computer.

The speed of operation is different:

The data width of the 64-bit CPU GPRS (General-Purpose Registers) is 64 bits, and the 64-bit instruction set can run 64-bit data instructions, which is twice as fast as the 32-bit (which requires four instructions and extracts four bytes of data at a time), and theoretically improves the performance by 1 time.

Addressing capabilities are different:

The advantage of a 64-bit processor is also reflected in the system's control over memory. Since addresses use special integers, an ALU (arithmetic logic combinator) and registers can handle larger integers, i.e., larger addresses.

The 32-bit CPU and operating system can only support up to 4G memory.

Definitely yes, Intel has all supported EMT64 after the Prescott P4 released in 04

You can use CPU-Z to look at the instruction set column.

In addition, the virtual machine group is on the product**, which is super cheap.

Support 64-bit system and computing, it is better not to install XP 64, there is no software to support it.

I don't understand anything upstairs. The AMD240 is definitely better than the AMD220. But the E6700 definitely beats the AMD240 in seconds.

It is even more impossible for AMD220 to compare with E6700. However, I don't think it's necessary to buy the E6700 because of the 07 product.

In these years, there is no cost-effective way to buy this low-end dual-core CPU. Now you can buy AMD 220 open core for more than 300, and the performance seconds E6700 can be more than that, and 600 blocks can be directly entered into the quad-core 640. 700 blocks can be put into i3...

In short, any one of them is much, much stronger than the E6700.

Of course, upgrading the CPU on the old motherboard is a different story. If it's a new computer, or you need to change the motherboard, then don't buy this kind of product that doesn't have any cost performance at all.

I can only say that it was okay once, but... It's too old u, isn't js fooling you? If you want to play games, you can still buy AMD, and if you want to play games, you can get a better graphics card. Because now U's performance is a lot of excess.