Can anyone explain. How does I have the consciousness of I am who I am ?

Consciousness formation may be a nerve in the brain.

But I think this is a state of "selflessness" that Buddhism emphasizes, that is, it is just a kind of consciousness. "I" is just a term for us to communicate conveniently in reality, something that does not exist, and what we will become is a cycle of cause and effect!

You can buy some books on Buddhism, but sometimes I am very confused, maybe I am just too depressed in life!

Each is relatively independent within a social group. There is commonality, similarity, and independence from others. My consciousness is formed in the human brain as a baby, but this consciousness is not absolute.

I also hope that you don't want to make the problem absolute. The exclusive solitary existence of man and my personal consciousness are two conceptual issues that cannot be confused. Right?

Self-awareness goes through a long process of development. Babies at 8 months old resist being held by strangers and become physically self-aware. Children around 1 year old take care of their belongings.

It may be difficult to talk to him at this point, saying to him "you drink water" and he will "you drink water", but it is not that he is deliberately making trouble. Two-year-old babies will become proficient in using "me".

Human nature dictates. Or human nature, nature. Just like Kong Xun said"Human nature is inherently good, and human nature is inherently evil"The same.

In fact, people are born to be selfish, people have their own consciousness, their own thoughts, people must first learn to respect themselves in order to better respect others, this is what they have"I am who I am"of consciousness.

When you're a kid and someone moves something (your limb), you have a feeling in your head. After a few years of accumulation, there is a range where you can feel that way, and I think that's the self!

As for what you're talking about, seeing other people and knowing that it's either your own feeling is based on that kind of self-feeling.

You can control yourself because your body and your brain are one and are controlled by your brain (with some exceptions, such as convulsions, etc.).

Your sense of self allows you to distinguish between self and non-self.

A robot can also control parts of its "body", but it is not self-aware because it has no life!

I'm a happy me, of course others have something to do with me, but what I want to know more is whether I can leave people and don't care about their existence, but I find that I can't, I can't live without other me, the world is like a computer game, you play yours and I play mine, who knows how to score in the end? I didn't know that I was inherently funny. The difference between animals and humans lies in self-awareness, but I don't think that's the case, because the animal's movement itself involves manipulation of the body, and when a person attacks it, they will protect themselves.

Human knowledge and thinking have a natural possibility in human biology that cannot be fully grasped and understood. I found it strange that when I immersed myself I found myself to be my enemy, and when I began to care about the world and my goals, I found that I was friendly with myself.

Me: Happy, communal but independent in behavior and thinking.

I am who I am, i am that i am is also what Jesus says in the Bible, to show that only I am the only child of God, to express a kind of self-confidence that comes from nature.

There's no need to have that kind of awareness, as long as you know that you can't find two leaves the same in the world! That's it,

I've thought about this question before, when one day, now"I a"disappear (die) and you become another"I b"But you'll never remember it again"I a".

Big brother, you're playing tricks!

A few **, straight to the heart.

We are who we are, and our hearts are free and auspicious, and we don't need to define the ruler.

Freud's theory of psychological structure explains that the human psyche is composed of three parts: id, ego, and superego!

The id, which contains the driving force of all instincts that demand immediate gratification, is like a cauldron boiling with instincts and desires. It follows the principle of happiness and blindly pursues satisfaction. Everything in the self is unconscious.

The ego, between the id and the superego, represents reason and resourcefulness, has a defensive and intermediary function, it acts according to the principles of reality, acts as an arbiter, monitors the movements of the id, and gives appropriate satisfaction.

Freud had a metaphor for the relationship between the id and the ego: the ego is the horse, and the ego is the coachman. The horse is the driving force, and the coachman gives the horse direction.

The ego has to control the ego, but the horse may not be obedient, and the two will stalemate until one of them gives in. In this regard, Freud famously said: "The self used to be in the **, and the self should be in the **."

The ego is like a bag of anger, caught between the "three tyrants": the external world, the superego and the id, trying to reconcile the conflicting demands of the three.

The superego represents conscience, social norms, and self-ideals, and is the senior leader of the personality, acting according to the principle of the supreme good, directing the ego and limiting the id, like a stern patriarch. Freud believed that only when the three "I's" live in harmony and maintain balance, people will develop healthily; And when the three quarrel, people sometimes wonder "is this one me or not"? Or there are different voices in the heart of the conversation:

Done? Can't do it? Or is it painful to be in conflict with lust and morality?

Or are you terrified of one of your ugly thoughts that stand out? If this condition persists for a long time, or if the conflict is severe, it will lead to neurosis.

My understanding is that will's ego is more often the same, and he lacks the constraints of the ego and superego, so his behavior is completely out of common sense, or in other words, it does not operate according to the mode of social expectations. In his heart he was actually afraid of this way, but he couldn't find an exit. Therefore, although he is alive and in various situations, it is not real, because most of the time he is just following his desires and is a slave of the "self".

Everyone is an independent individual, so everyone's thoughts and consciousness only exist in a single individual, in fact, I think this involves materialism and idealism, materialism is the belief that human ideology is dependent on matter, idealism believes that matter is dependent on consciousness and exists, and matter is the product of consciousness.

In fact, it can be said that matter is produced by complex combinations of consciousness, and people understand the world through consciousness, so everyone looks at the world from the microcosm of their own perspective, which is like if you stand in one place and look at the stars, there are many stars, and there is only one position in which you are.

If telepathy can be established between people, then the consciousness and thoughts of multiple individuals can coexist, but in this way, "I" is not "me", but "we" - because the word "me" itself means oneself, that is, one person, so naturally there is only one "me".

Wrong. "Me"It refers to a kind of consciousness, and consciousness is a reaction that objectively exists in the human brain. "Me"It is not a true me, but a theoretical systematization, a philosophical expression, and an abstract concept.

What you think"Me"It is innate, because there is no deep understanding of the difference between abstract thinking and feeling.

Consciousness includes both sensations and abstract thoughts. Abstract thinking is the reflection of the human brain on the nature and laws of objective things. But feelings are born with it, it is innate.

It is composed of the individual's own unique time, place, experience, and insight! Otherwise, it is impossible for anyone else to have the same factor, and therefore, it constitutes the unique essence or phenomenon of "me".

Buddhism has the answers you want! "I" is attached to me.

Own will, idealism!

"I" mainly refers to "self" and is an important concept in ontology.