How about the Canon 70 200 F1 4 shooting scenery

First of all, Canon doesn't have this lens; Guess you're talking about 70-200f4 or. Both lenses are medium telephoto lenses. The biggest use of this lens is to shoot close-ups in the distance, and it is generally used to shoot people, and there are more close-ups.

It's less common to shoot landscapes, but it's not that there aren't, because the compressed image effect obtained when shooting landscapes with a telephoto lens is still very common in landscape photography. However, telephoto lenses are used less often in landscape photography than wide-angle lenses, so if you're new to photography, it's best to start with wide-angle landscapes. For example, Canon's EF17-40; ef16-35；ef24-70；EF24-105 These lenses are used.

F4L or huh? The Canon Wood has a 70-200 F shot.

Although you can't shoot the grandeur of a wide-angle lens with a telephoto lens, you can shoot a different style, depending on your composition and framing.

In photography, the head is more important than the lens.

Canon 70-200 4 (not colloquially known as "Little White".) It is to reduce the maximum aperture from 4 on the basis of small white. This lens is very cost-effective, making it more suitable for landscape photography. The imaging quality of this lens is excellent!

It's a hard question, because I've never heard of the Canon 70mm-200mm aperture that big, and I'm using the aperture.

The focal length range is okay, and the aperture doesn't seem to be that big, so it would be great if there were.

Canon pixels are average, the Sony brand used is good, and it's not too expensive. You can go to the physical store and compare it before buying.

The choice of 70-200F4 and these two lenses can be made from the perspective of performance, from the perspective of **, and from the perspective of cost performance. Different users have different needs, so there will be different selection results.

In the field of lenses, there is a lofty ......"Big Three". Correspondingly, there is a slightly inferior ......"Little Ternary".

Among them, the so-called large ternary refers to the combination of three constant-aperture lenses: ultra-wide-angle lenses, standard zoom lenses, and telephoto lenses. This is the best performing zoom lens with the highest status.

The so-called small ternary refers to the combination of three lenses with a constant f4 aperture composed of 16-35F-70F-200F4. This is a combination of the same high performance, but one level lower than the three constant-aperture lenses above.

As a user who is looking for absolute performance, it is the best lens and the most worthy lens.

As a user who pays attention to the **, the 70-200F4 lens ** is relatively low, and they think that such a lens is more worthy of choice.

As for users who pursue cost-effectiveness, how they choose depends on their understanding of the concept of cost-effective......

It still depends on your budget, and of course it's better than the F4 one. The aperture is larger, the bokeh effect is better, and it is quite good to shoot people and flowers and landscapes, and of course, it is more expensive. Buy good ones if you can afford them. If you get your hands on F4, one day you'll think it's chicken ribs.