Which one has better overall performance, SCAR or XM8? 10

SCAR has not been used. The XM8 has a fast rate of fire and fairly accurate headshots.

However, if you want to talk about the comprehensive performance, it must be AK47, M4, and AWM.

First of all, it is concluded that there is a problem ...... 1L

These two ** do have their own advantages, but compared with the data, it seems that SCAR is more versatile and flexible, but, after all, SCAR is a specially designed one**, and XM8 is a kind of OICW project branch-out**.

Moreover, the XM8 project was already in the cold by the US Army in 2005, and SCAR continues to develop, so you ask which is better, and I can only tell you that SCAR ......

XM8 took first place, with 127 rounds of 60,000 rounds of bad ammunition.

MK16 (SCAR) second place, 60,000 rounds of bad ammunition for 226 rounds.

HK416 second, 60,000 rounds of ammunition for 233 rounds.

M4 is the worst, 60,000 rounds of bad ammunition is 863 rounds!

Despite this, the U.S. Army decided to purchase more M4s, saying it was satisfied with the M4's performance. However, the Special Operations Command began to abandon the M4SEAL opted for the MK16 MK17 (, the Army's own Delta Force has replaced the M4 M4A1 with HK416

After the U.S. military tried it, the response to SCAR was a little better, and the test result was also that SCAR was better.

Accuracy, range, etc., are definitely better than the Scar-H.

SCAR shoots faster, XM8 is more powerful. The XM8 can be used as a sniper, at least for me. PS: All are standard versions.

SCAR, it feels better, XM8 many newcomers will not aim.

Personally, I feel that SCAR is a little better. The U.S. military wants to choose a new gun to replace the M16, and the XM8 has more functions and has not improved much in performance, so the U.S. military has turned its attention to SCAR, and the Seal has also tried it, but the U.S. military still seems to be dissatisfied and has not officially equipped. However, the civilian version of SCAR also has a certain market, indicating that it is still popular.

In addition, it has long rails and more accessories that can be installed than the XM8. The performance of the 95 is very good, but the common problem of stockless guns cannot be avoided, and the 95 has few accessories, and the popularity rate is quite low. At the moment, the new Chinese gun is at most just a drawing, and the 95 03 still has room for improvement, which will be enough for a while.

The 95 change looks good, and the 03 is also a foreign trade model. At present, because ammunition has not developed much, the space for the development of guns is very limited.

SCAR is better, originally designed for special tactical forces, suitable for complex special operations environment, strong reliability, and XM8 is the United States intends to replace the rifle, but XM8 in the test exposed a lot of shortcomings, due to the United States for the rifle ultra-short portable high requirements, so that the XM8 body is very short, although the barrel is short, but the accuracy is poor, in addition to China's 95 compared with the two, its quality is certainly not comparable, it is only in the cost performance advantage, you must know that the United States has always been wealthy, Quality-oriented.

Or SCAR is a little better, this gun is developed for special tactics, the seal has been tried, XM8 has exposed a lot of problems in actual use, it needs to be improved, 95 words, there is no comparison, first of all, the quality is not good, and there are few accessories, to be honest, 03 is better than 95, many veterans would rather use 81 bars than 95, and China's guns, first-class goods are exported, second-class goods are used internally, and third-class goods are equipped with troops.

1 The good 2 of the US army is not to blow the 95 excellent version is definitely able to pk more than two guns with high accuracy. With infrared aiming and ranging, the 95 can fully participate in operations in any battlefield environment. 3 At present, China is mainly improving the 95, and has not yet developed a new rifle.

scar that's absolutely ... You strafe with xm8, and the impact is more scattered than the destruction... That's an absolute search for death.

SCAR civilian artifact, strafing point fire suppression is good, but don't think of XM8 waste wood, long-range point fire, use XM8, because he has a scope.

Scar has a fast rate of fire, easy melee to KO opponents, XM8 accurate, suitable points, or close-range headers [all say the standard version].

The enhanced version is still scar h good, the power is great, and the AK can fight for power, and the XM8 enhanced version of the Lezhi is a sniper, and the competition is basically plundered.

It depends on which gun the landlord is used to

SCAR and XM8 have the same reload, but the first three shots of the XM8 can be shot in the head 90% (melee, about the length of the power station), and SCAR, I personally didn't find any benefit, I don't use this gun much, I think it's better for the landlord to buy an AK

SCAR feels good, especially good, although the power is not as good as M4's, the victory is moderate enough, and all aspects are not very prominent.

The XM8 bullet is too floating, the SCAR is better, and the power is the same.

XM8 has a micro sight, but it feels more floating, SCAR feels less powerful, but it is more stable, if you are confident in your marksmanship, choose SCAR, after all, it is better in terms of wandering.

Just use it yourself well. No gun is perfect.

The XM8 can get a one-shot headshot at full state, but the trajectory is unstable.

The HK416 417 has high accuracy (now equipped with US special forces), SCAR is highly modular (now equipped with US special forces), XM8 has high reliability (the most elite unit of the US military --- the Marine Corps is in service), and AN94 is powerful (now equipped with Russian special forces). Overall the XM8 is better.