Which one is better iPod or Sony?

Fashionable,Nano is very good,There are many colors,The shape is also very good,And the functions are much more than sony,Touch is indeed a little big,Listening to songs takes up some space,But if you look at something** or something, say it separately。

I bought MP4 and wandered between Apple and Sony for a long time.,But considering Sony's appearance,It's really a little unacceptable.,There's also one.,It's a little troublesome to use iTunes for the first time to synchronize songs.,But it's good in the future.,I still recommend Nano.

The benevolent see the benevolent and the wise see the wise, and they are all good.

Look at your choices and know that your budget is quite sufficient, so don't mention the money.

If you're just listening to songs, the touch is too big.

The appearance of the Sony A808 is outdated at first glance, and I do product design, there is no doubt about that.

It's better to still have a new nano, it's trendy enough, the taste is good, and the sound quality is okay.

To sum up, iPod nano.

Upstairs said that IPC is the best? Pull it down. The iPod is very good, but the sound quality of white water is not appreciated by everyone.

I have touch and it chip is the same as nano. Apple's products in recent years have not been sincere. For example, the MacBook Pro has not changed anything, and it is much more expensive to add a battery; nano5 doesn't improve the sound quality, but what kind of camera, FM as a gimmick, please, who uses *** camera, FM is common now, what does it mean.

And the ipad that is going to come out now, it is really beautiful enough, practicality, there are too few in China.

Sony has no drawbacks other than being a little more expensive and made in Japan. Personally, I like it very much, and it is also the XK1050 that is about to be acquired, which is super recommended.

iPod nano is a little better, the important thing is practical, the quality can be assured, although he and Sony's products are generally similar, but the iPod is more fashionable and good-looking after all.

If you pursue sound quality, Sony is definitely much better than iPod,And the best sound quality in iPod is classicAfter all, it's a hard disk machine,The advantage of touch is that the game (mostly boring),Internet and ****, The sound quality is similar to nano,It's all boiled water。 The nano is a bit sleeker and smaller.

iPod Pull Apple's *** is the most professional pull Sony and iPod can not be compared.

I bought a Sony when I listened to a song, and I took an iPod, I have seen several of them, and they are all stinky and conspicuous.

I don't know Walkman in my life, even if I have an iPod, it's in vain:

Sony's sound quality is better than iPod's, I don't believe it anyway...

The main control chip of the iPod nano2 is Samsung, the power chip is Phillips, and the audio chip is Wolfson.

Wolfson's chip is pretty good.

Meizu's M6 audio chip is Phillips' top chip, but I personally think that Meizu's production process is not good and cannot give full play to the effect of the chip.

Many people think that the iPod is not effective because her standard headphones are too rubbish.

But the iPod's mid-to-high frequency rendering is very good, and it's good to listen to pop songs with a good headphone.

I think that different people have different requirements for **, but I don't think that Sony used it myself in order to please the ears and enhance the bass rendering.

The NW-S203 is just as good as the mid-to-high sound.

The equalizer can be adjusted by yourself, I used the same headphones (EX71SL) to compare my Sony and my classmates' iPods, and I feel that the iPods are tepid and have no characteristics, but they are just very balanced.

Regarding the format problem, I think the best thing for Sony is to use the ATRAC format on ***, which is a format used for MD, mainly by filtering out the sound that the human ear can't hear to reduce the volume, and AAC is a bit similar to WMA, both of which are better than *** at low bit rates, and there is nothing to say about lossless compression.

As long as you don't buy it online, you can see the real thing at a glance when you go to a physical store to buy it

Go straight to a brick-and-mortar store or buy it on Excellence.