Is it reasonable to give yourself an IOU to a man

Are you sure you have the ability to pay back?

If not—

The 150,000 can almost be regarded as a bargaining chip to control you, as long as you want to leave him, you have to pay it back. Even if you are malicious, he will still ask you to pay back if he doesn't want you in the future - because you owe him an IOU as proof. However, now that you don't make an IOU, it seems that he won't say yes, so either put yourself in a dangerous situation or leave him.

Of course, from his point of view, he is not wrong, because first of all, the money is really spent on you, not casually. Secondly, in the process of interacting with him, for some reason, you have the behavior of interacting with other people, and he is also adding a little safety factor for himself to prevent the loss of both people and money.

In my opinion, without the feelings of marriage, you are feeling all kinds of pressure now, and there will be no future for your future in the next year. Love is short-lived, and it cannot be transformed into affection until it dies, and it is unimaginable later. Moreover, similar to the relationship between men and women in the nature of support, it is extremely rare for the woman to continue to decline in old age.

You have to recognize that.

To sum up, the wisest thing for you to do right now is not to make IOUs and leave this dangerous game. Have a good talk about someone who can marry you and live together, preferably someone who loves you.

Don't fight, let him watch it, love to buy it or not.

Love someone, why is it entangled with money,

That's it for the woman now, he has no money, will you follow him?

Unreasonable, don't fight. But there's a situation where he's testing you, 15w. If you have a good relationship, there is nothing wrong with fighting, but after a while he will take the initiative to scrap the IOU, or it will be a thing.

I suggest you call first, but the house is in your name, and then you won't go in if he doesn't take the initiative to abolish the IOU.

It's better to pay back the money and find another one. Such a life is too precarious......In case he changes his mind in the future, what do you get? is already nameless and shareless, and his family doesn't recognize you, which is enough for you to suffer. Why bother.

It costs 15w ...... a year

Cow is just one word...

Feelings are deep, and wealth is also scored.

This man wants you to pay him back.

However, it is only natural to repay debts.

You'd better make an IOU and be ready to pay it back.

Otherwise, this man can't look down on you.

Reasonable is reasonable, but hurts feelings

As long as he truly loves you, he won't care too much, but be sure to change the "IOU" to reality.

Legal analysis: As long as the agreement reached by the two parties and the IOU written by the two parties are the embodiment of the true intentions of the parties, and are not signed under the premise of coercion or deception, and the content of the agreement and the IOU are not illegal, such a cooperation agreement and IOU are legal and valid, and are legally binding on both parties.

Legal basis: Article 188 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: The statute of limitations for requesting protection of civil rights from the people's courts is three years. Where the law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.

The limitation period is calculated from the date on which the right holder knows or should know that the right has been damaged and the obligor. Where the law provides otherwise, follow those provisions. However, if more than 20 years have elapsed since the date on which the rights were infringed, the people's courts will not grant protection, and where there are special circumstances, the people's courts may decide to extend the rights holder on the basis of the right holder's application.

is reasonable. Therefore, the loan between husband and wife is protected by law, and everyone has the right to protect their own interests.

It seems that there is no distinction between husband and wife, you and I have become accustomed to it, but do IOUs between husband and wife really not count? Is it true that husband and wife don't have to pay back the money they borrow? In fact, borrowing between husband and wife is actually common, especially in the case of the AA system of marital property.

However, considering the relationship between husband and wife, many parties often do not require their spouses to issue a "loan agreement" or "IOU", which makes it difficult to claim the loan from the other party in the event of divorce, so it is necessary to do a good job in the preservation of evidence when the loan relationship occurs. For example, pay attention to the following points.

1. When the other party proposes to borrow money from itself, it must require a written loan agreement or IOU to be signed with the other party as evidence, and the borrower's purpose of borrowing should be indicated in the IOU as the employer's personal affairs or personal business activities, so as to prevent the court from rejecting the litigation claim as a joint family business or family joint expenditure.

2. The lender shall deposit the proposed loan into a personal account, and the loan shall be directly delivered by transfer and other vouchers when the loan is paid, so as to prove the existence of real borrowing behavior.

3. If the repayment period is agreed, attention must be paid to the statute of limitations, if the repayment period expires and the other party has not repaid the loan, the two parties have not divorced at this time, and the lender cannot file a lawsuit for loan disputes between husband and wife, but there is a situation that exceeds the statute of limitations of 2 years. Therefore, the lender needs to separately request the borrower to issue an IOU or re-sign the Loan Agreement to extend the repayment period, so as to prevent the part of the creditor's rights from being realized after the statute of limitations in the future divorce.

Due to the rapid development of social economy, people's concept changes, the marriage relationship is no longer as stable as in the past, in order to prevent future marriage changes and do preventive work in advance is also helpless, husband and wife are the most intimate personal relationship, more often rely on trust and the feelings of both husband and wife to resolve the conflict. Therefore, when dealing with money issues, husband and wife should respect and support each other, strive to avoid unnecessary money disputes, and protect the most precious feelings between husband and wife.

It is reasonable, because it is a testimony to the ins and outs of this payment, even if it is two couples, no matter how close people should calculate the money.

It is unreasonable, because two people are already married, and the money is also owned by everyone, and it is the joint property of the marriage, and there should be no IOU if you borrow money.

Reasonable and unreasonable, depending on the situation. Although it is a husband and wife, it is still necessary to settle the account, if it is a small amount, you will be a little careful with the IOU, but if it is a large amount, you are doing it very right.

Reasonable, borrowing money to make an IOU, a matter of course, don't think that it is a husband and wife who can settle accounts less clearly, or draw it clearly.

Unreasonable, what kind of fairy marriage is this, isn't your property legally joint property after marriage, and besides, the relationship between you doesn't even have this trust, are you still afraid that he will not pay back the money.

I don't think it's reasonable, the husband and wife are the same forest birds, one is prosperous, and the other is lost, so there should be no borrowing between you.

I think it's reasonable for my husband to borrow money from someone else and make an IOU, but I don't think my husband needs to borrow money from you, so it shouldn't be considered a loan.

Not suitable, because once you are unfortunately divorced, you may need to bear the money owed by this IOU, which is a certain risk for you.

is reasonable, this is the same as the fact that the brothers should also settle the accounts clearly, even if they are husband and wife, it is better to explain the financial aspects clearly.

I don't think it's particularly reasonable, because you are husband and wife, and it stands to reason that your money should be his money, and it should not be divided between each other.

Unreasonable, if the IOU, to be honest, is only a nominal couple, or the other party has a problem with the brain, and the parents are behind the support.

What matters need to be paid attention to when making an IOU, and what is the legal effect of the IOU What matters need to be paid attention to when making an IOU The creditor of the IOU and the debtor need to pay attention to the following points when making an IOU: 1. The object referred to in the IOU must be clear, clear and unambiguous, and it is best to attach the ID card number to the natural person; 2. There should be no extra space between the lines, and it should be compact; 3. Carefully check whether the signature of the debtor is correct, and it is best to attach the ID number of the debtor in the IOU to avoid unnecessary disputes; 4. The signature of the debtor shall be written in person, so as to prevent the debtor from using other people to sign and finally refuse to admit the IOU; 5. It is best to reflect the reason for the arrears in the IOU for verification. What is the legal effect of an IOU An IOU is legally valid, an IOU is equivalent to a contract, an IOU is written, and an agreement is promised to repay it after one year, there is a corresponding obligation, that is, your friend must repay the arrears within the agreed time.

Of course, there is a premise for this, that is, the IOU must be voluntary, the true expression of your own intentions, and not for coercion or other reasons. Please note that it is advisable to have two copies of the slip, one for each party. As a quick and convenient way to confirm, in general, the documents are handwritten, the issuer has specificity, that is, written and stamped by the debtor, borrower, and recipient, the above is the relevant information summarized for you, I hope it can help you, Network is committed to creating an excellent legal consultation platform, if you still have questions, welcome to enter the lawyer consultation.

Article 108 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China [Repayment of Debts] Debts shall be repaid. If the debtor is temporarily unable to repay, the debtor may repay the loan in installments with the consent of the creditor or the ruling of the people's court. and where they have the ability to repay and refuse to repay, the people's court is to make a judgment to compel repayment.

Of course, it is effective, it is protected by law, and there are many such cases in my country, so I will give you a case, you can take a closer look.

In real life, we sometimes encounter a mutual borrowing relationship between husband and wife during the conclusion of marriage, for example, during the marriage, the husband Mr. Hou borrowed 100,000 yuan from his wife for expenses, but it didn't take long for the two to divorce and agree that Mr. Hou would return the arrears, but the ex-husband was unwilling to perform. Ms. Chan took her ex-husband to court. A few days ago, the relevant court made a first-instance judgment on this post-divorce property dispute:

Mr. Hou was ordered to pay his ex-wife, Ms. Chen, $100,000.

On 7 August 2006, Mr. Hou borrowed $100,000 from Ms. Chen for personal expenses and issued an IOU. In 2007, the parties entered into a voluntary divorce agreement, which stated that the husband owed the woman a debt of 100,000 yuan, which was evidenced by the IOU written by the man to the woman. Since then, Mr. Hou has not returned it.

Mr. Hou argued that the property was mixed during the existence of the husband and wife relationship, and the income of both parties was joint income, and even if the IOU existed, it could not prove that the fact of borrowing had actually occurred. Moreover, the IOU and the divorce agreement were both coerced by the ex-wife by illegal means, and were not her original intention.

The court held that Mr. Hou's argument that the divorce agreement was written under duress did not provide sufficient evidence to prove it, and the witness testimony provided by Mr. Hou was not sufficient to prove his claim. Secondly, the divorce registration required the husband and wife to handle it in person at the divorce registration authority, and it was difficult to confirm that Mr. Hou had reached a voluntary divorce agreement under the coercion of Ms. Chen, so Mr. Hou's argument was not accepted.

Are nuptial IOUs valid after divorce? This is a very common legal issue, and many divorce parties often have disputes over it. In view of the fact that the new Marriage Law stipulates that the nature of personal property does not change depending on the length of the marital relationship, the nuptial IOU will generally be accepted as valid evidence by the courts, unless there is evidence to the contrary.

The party issuing the IOU bears the burden of proof for the existence of the opposite situation, and bears adverse legal consequences if the evidence is not sufficient. For this reason, we believe it is necessary to remind everyone not to arbitrarily issue IOUs or IOUs to their spouses for reasons that are not genuine debts or other reasons.

Valid when it must be written, how much cash to borrow from your mother's family (your name). Handprints, signatures. What you represent here is not your common property.

Is it reasonable to owe people money? Is it hateful for others to collect debts?