What is the next move for the United States after officially withdrawing from the WHO?

After officially withdrawing from the WHO, the next move of the United States is actually to dismantle the current WHO and re-establish a new WHO, and the new WHO will only serve the United States and its allies. In fact, Pompeo has publicly revealed the United States' plan to reorganize the WHO a long time ago. The reason given by the United States for withdrawing from the WHO is that they believe that the current WHO information is not transparent enough and misleads the United States and some other countries, but in fact their move is very ambitious.

If the United States wants to set up a new WHO, there should not be much problem in terms of funding and technology, originally in the existing WHO, the United States shared about 20% of the cost, plus some other rich allies of the United States, I personally think the cost can be solved. Secondly, the United States is still leading the world in medical technology, so there will not be too many problems in medical technology. <>

For the current United States, the most important problem is to poach people, because since the United States wants to form a new WHO, then there must be other countries to respond, that is to say, there must be other countries to withdraw from the current WHO, and then join the new WHO. <>

However, judging from the current situation, it seems that no country has responded, even if it has always had a good relationship with the United States, Japan, France, the United Kingdom, etc., have not publicly responded to the United States. Of course, it is inevitable that these countries will make different decisions in the future, and once these more influential countries respond to the United States, it is very likely that there will be a new turning point in the establishment of a new WHO by the United States.

After formally withdrawing from the WHO, the United States will stop funding the WHO, and at the same time set health standards and even epidemic prevention and control standards that it considers in line with the interests of the United States, and allow vassals such as the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia to join.

The next move of the United States will certainly dissuade some of its allies from withdrawing from the World Health Organization and win over some teammates in order to achieve the goal of uniting with itself.

The spearhead is likely to be directed at China. The United States is now operating a series of operations to ensure that its country's economic stability does not retreat, so as long as it is beneficial to it, they will do it.

In fact, we don't know what the next move of the United States will be, because their national secrets will not let us know.

The reason for the withdrawal of the United States from the WHO: This is Trump's habitual practice. As soon as a world organization does not act according to the will of the United States, Trump will immediately retaliate by withdrawing from the group.

Impact on the United States and the world: The move to withdraw from the WHO "will not protect the lives or interests of the American people, but will make Americans sick and leave the United States isolated."

Since the spread of the new crown pneumonia epidemic in the United States, the United States has been busy shifting the responsibility for its own ineffective response to the epidemic, and one of the most important targets is the World Health Organization.

Yes, as of March 2021, the United States has withdrawn from the WHO.

On July 7, 2020, a senior U.S. official U.S. House confirmed that the White House had officially withdrawn the U.S. from the WHO. The U.S. withdrawal took effect on July 6 and the UN Secretary-General had been notified, the ** said.

On April 14, 2020, at a White House press conference, Trump announced that the United States would suspend funding for the World Health Organization, accusing the World Health Organization of not sharing information on the epidemic in a timely manner, failing to provide timely advice on epidemic prevention policies, and failing to declare a "global pandemic" in a timely manner. Trump said "after all this time, it's time to hold them accountable for this."

As of March 2021, the United States has not officially withdrawn from the WHO. On July 8, 2020, according to a number of U.S. ** reports, the Trump administration in the United States, which has repeatedly threatened to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) in the past few months, finally made a decision and announced its official withdrawal.

But even if Trump officially announces his withdrawal from the World Health Organization, according to the United Nations, formal withdrawal from the World Health Organization requires a year's notice to the United Nations before he can withdraw.

The spokesperson for the UN Secretary-General also confirmed that the United States had officially notified UN Secretary-General António Guterres on July 6 that it would withdraw from the WHO on July 6, 2021. In other words, there is still a one-year "cooling-off period" between the announcement of the United States' formal withdrawal from the WHO and the actual loss of the United States' membership in the WHO.

There is no benefit to the withdrawal of the United States from the WHO, and if the United States does not participate in the relevant WHO cooperation projects, the ability of the American people to obtain vaccines** may be limited; If the United States is not a member of the WHO, the country's global health strategy for a rapid response to international disease outbreaks will also be affected, as WHO has long tracked and responded to outbreaks of infectious diseases around the world.

Health and security in the United States and around the world requires strong cooperation between the United States and WHO. It is unlikely that the United States will sever its relationship with the WHO without major disruption and disruption, and the withdrawal of the United States from the WHO will put the American people in an even more insecure position.

It will have a positive impact on both sides, and the two sides can share medical technology and epidemic prevention experience, which has played a role in promoting the prevention and control of the global epidemic.

If the United States returns to the WHO, it will be more conducive to the WHO's activities around the world, and it will also be conducive to the United States in the prevention and control of the new crown epidemic, which will play a very important role in the stability of the whole world.

Of course, it is very good for the WHO, but it must be punished accordingly, so that it can be more authoritative.

Although the withdrawal of the United States has caused a lot of dissatisfaction in the past, for better development in the future, global cooperation is inevitable, and cooperation between the two will promote the development of world health and help them face risks and challenges together.

For the United States, it is very likely that they will reduce the epidemic in their own country. For the WHO, they will be helped by the United States to make the world's health safer.

The return of the United States to the WHO will be of great help to the new crown epidemic in the United States and can help the United States end the epidemic as soon as possible.

The United States is due to its own internal reasons. So withdraw from the WHO, this is to satisfy political interests. The re-entry of the United States into the WHO requires a reassertion of international standing.

The WHO needs the United States, and the United States needs the WHO. After all, the United States is still the member state with the largest contribution to the WHO, (although it has been in arrears, it has not paid its membership fees since 2019, and the United States would have had to pay about 100 million dollars in membership dues in 2020.) As of July 2020, the United States still owes about $200 million in contributions to WHO.

For this return, the membership fee should be paid first. The level of medical and health technology in the United States is still the most advanced in the world. The return of the United States to the WHO still has a positive effect on the WHO and global medical and health technology.

We should welcome this decision by the United States.

The United States has to pay a high fee to the World Health Organization every year, resulting in a psychological imbalance in the United States, and it is unwilling to pay high fees. And because the new crown epidemic is highly questioned in the United States, the United States is afraid that the World Health Organization will go to the United States to investigate, and the whole world is afraid that the spearhead will be pointed at them.

The United States has to pay a high fee to the World Health Organization every year, and is unwilling to pay a high fee, and because the new crown epidemic is highly questioned in the United States, the United States is afraid that the World Health Organization will go to the United States to investigate, and the most important thing is that there is a suspicion of dumping.

Because the United States believes that it allocates so much money to the WHO every year, but the WHO has constantly criticized the United States for its practices and called on countries to learn from China during the epidemic, which is not in line with their America-first philosophy, and feels that there is no return for their efforts, so they insist on withdrawing.

The United States has withdrawn from the WHO because of the unfavorable protection against the epidemic, many of its citizens have been affected, and it cannot bear some responsibility if it insists on doing so.

The WHO itself is only involved in the field of science, education, culture and health, and compared with UNESCO, the WHO is still able to serve the interests of the United States. The United States itself hoped that the organization would be effective, but it was disappointed by the reality. Today, the United States has become the most severely affected country in the world.

Naturally, the United States is reluctant to continue to invest.

What does the United States have to do with the withdrawal of the United States from the World Health Organization and where its headquarters will be moved? Originally, the headquarters of the World Health Organization was not in the United States, but in Switzerland, although the headquarters of the United Nations is in New York, and the World Health Organization is only a specialized agency of the United Nations, but its headquarters is not in the United States.

Honestly, aren't you thinking too much, and we shouldn't be bothering about these issues at all, right? The World Health Organization itself must have considered it for a long time, to be honest, the United States is such an arrogant country, in the end it can't play with anyone, is it if the United States really collapses in the end, then those countries that were once allies of the United States, I think they may come to pick more than anyone else, recently the United States officially launched the process of withdrawing from the World Health Organization, then many people think that the World Health Organization will not move, then you completely think too much,Although the headquarters of the United Nations is in the United States, the problem is that the headquarters of the World Health Organization is in Switzerland.

And the World Health Organization is the largest international health organization, which can be said to have helped a lot in this epidemicAnd it has played an important role in leading the overall situation, and every announcement it makes has a great role in guiding the final epidemic, to be honest, whether the United States can withdraw or not will definitely have a certain impact, but the establishment of the World Health Organization has been there a long time ago, and its influence is also recognized by the world, and it will not directly become a plate of scattered sand because of the withdrawal of the United States.

And we know that Switzerland has always been a neutral country. Therefore, it is only right that the World Health Organization, an international body, has set up camp here, and Switzerland will not choose a team at any time, which is why Switzerland has been able to remain safe and sound in several world wars, so this place has also become the seat of many international organizations. And now the United States is not only withdrawing from the WHO, but also the United Nations Industrial Development Organization, UNESCO, the Human Rights Council, etc., it can be seen that the United States does not know what it wants to do, because he has withdrawn from these organizations, and it is bound to not be in the scope of the organization's consideration in the future, but the problem is that the United States can also be exempt from the constraints of these places.

WHO's field headquarters should be relocated to a neutral country to better contribute to the people of the world. That's right.

I haven't talked about migration at the moment, but even if it were, it was probably going in the direction of Europe. Actually, I don't think it's necessary to move away or not, it's just that the United States doesn't want to mix with the WHO, so it's quitting the group again.

The World Health Organization is in Switzerland, its headquarters is not in the United States, and Geneva is a neutral city, which has always been a neutral country, and of course this place has become the seat of many international organizations.

China welcomes the WHO at any time, the WHO can come to China to station, China will always welcome just organizations, and the United States will withdraw from the WHO, so come to China.