When did Japan officially withdraw from the League of Nations

There is a discrepancy in the time.

When we returned to the United Nations 50 years ago, we were still a small country economically, and our per capita GDP was about 1 10 or even 1 percent of that of the developed countries of the United States and Japan, so our contributions were very, very small.

And just two or three years ago, China has surpassed Japan and become the second largest country in the United Nations, and in a sense, we can even say that the United Nations is supported by our country today.

But we have never been in arrears, and if we were to be a little bit in arrears, like the United States, then I think the United Nations would really be unsustainable.

And a few years ago, when he was in office, he famously withdrew from the group, not only withdrawing from this agreement and that agreement, but also withdrawing from many international organizations, such as UNESCO and the like, and as a result, the withdrawal of the United States gave us an opportunity.

We are now under the jurisdiction of the United Nations, a number of international organizations and special committees, all of which are led by the people of the China Qi Nuclear Weapons Corporation, and it can be said that after 50 years of development, China's weight in the United Nations has become heavier and heavier.

Japan's withdrawal from the League of Nations was a product of politics, and it was also an attempt by Japan to build up the people's hearts and minds in an attempt to gain the support of the people in its invasion of China and arouse the arrogance of the people.

In April 1933, Yoyoyo Matsuoka, Japan's plenipotentiary to the League of Nations, returned to Tokyo from Geneva, Switzerland. Because he had just announced his "withdrawal from the League of Nations" with a strong attitude, he won the hearts of the people in the country, and a large number of ordinary people gathered at the train station to greet him, and Matsuoka Yoyoshi walked through the crowd like a triumphant general.

However, in the face of the hustle and bustle of the people, he did not have a trace of joy, but made a special apology statement: "I am a loser and sorry for the people who failed to understand Japan's position if I failed to make (the world's countries) understand Japan's position." ”

As everyone knows, the reason why Japan withdrew from the League of Nations was because the Lytton investigation team after the "September 18 Incident" appeared to be unfavorable to the conclusion of the report of the Japanese side. In his report submitted in October 1932, Lytton, the former Governor-General of British India, who was sent by the League of Nations to conduct an on-the-spot investigation in Northeast China, stated that the "September 18 Incident" was not an "act of self-defense" as repeatedly claimed by the Japanese side, and that the independence of "Manchukuo" from China was not the idea of the local people, but was imposed by foreign Japanese troops by force.

Although the Lytton report changed its tone and made the following statement: The League of Nations respected the rights of the Japanese to reside and do business in Northeast China, and proposed the establishment of "Manchurian autonomy**" on the premise of maintaining China's sovereignty, and the League of Nations should send special personnel to guide it; Northeast China became a demilitarized zone, and the League of Nations set up a special police station to maintain law and order; China and Japan signed the Non-Aggression Pact.

It was clear that the League of Nations, dominated by the Western powers, had made huge concessions to Japan, after all, there was only one power in the Far East that needed to take the lead and hold back the nascent communist Soviet Union, and after the Great Depression of 1929, the European and American countries had not yet recovered and did not have enough capacity to suppress Japan. As Sadaichi Suzuki, a cadre of the Japanese Ministry of War at the time, said: "The League of Nations is nothing more than a noisy rhetoric and will not exert its strength to attack us."

On the one hand, the Japanese hardliners have stepped up their efforts to cook the "Manchukuo" pot of raw rice into mature rice, and on the other hand, they have withdrawn from the League of Nations in a high-profile manner. However, the Japanese cabinet at that time, with the exception of Minister Yasuya Uchida, almost all members opposed the withdrawal from the League of Nations. Matsuoka's initial mission in Geneva was not to withdraw from the League of Nations, but to try his best to maintain his position in the League of Nations and try to find a reconciliation plan that would be beneficial to Japan after the "September 18 Incident."

Because the Axis powers such as Germany, Italy, and Japan before World War II had already begun to be in a state of political hostility with the later Allies, they continued to remain in the League of Nations and were politically suppressed by the Allies, which had a very adverse impact on the future war.

Because the Axis powers such as Germany, Italy, and Japan before World War II had already begun to be in a state of political hostility with the later Allies, they continued to remain in the League of Nations and were politically suppressed by the Allies, which had a very adverse impact on the future war.

Japan's withdrawal from the League of Nations was its moral and diplomatic failure. Over the past year, the perverse behavior of Japanese militarism has increasingly exposed its hideous features in front of the people of the world. Japan was already diplomatically isolated and had to withdraw from the League of Nations.

This move has pitted Japan against the international community.