A high score will be rewarded with 100 human translators

Many of these software vendors attempt to circumvent these End User License Agreements (EULAs) if a user somehow obtains the software without consent or becomes subject to the EULA, then they do not have any license to use the software at all.

Under the controversial nature of the proposed U.S. Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA), the Model Law has been passed in Virginia and Maryland, where software manufacturers are given broad rights to shut down unauthorized software copiers without court intervention, as found in a number of similar provisions, the U.S. DMCA, the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act, which enables copyright holders to request service providers (one-stop shop) to intercept access to infringing material as soon as possible. If the one-stop primer** is complied with, it is rightfully a safe haven and it provides immunity from infringement claims. If it is not complied with, this does not become a liability, but may not be an act that relies on protecting communication etiquette.

The title of the DMCA in the United States, the WIPO Copyright and Performances and Phonograms Treaty Enforcement Act has provided for the prevention of someone from "circumventing [Netherland] technical measures to effectively control entry into a work". Therefore, if a software manufacturer has some kind of software, decryption or password access device installed in the software in any attempt to bypass such a copying prevention plan, it may take action - although the U.S. Copyright Office is now reviewing a nticircumvention rule, under the DMCA-an Ticircumvention exemption has been in place under the DMCA including those in the design of the software filter**, It is generally considered inefficient (child safety and public library filtering software) and circumvention of copy prevention mechanisms that have malfunctioned, resulting in the software becoming inoperable, or which is no longer supported by the manufacturer.

Most commercially exploited proprietary software developed in the United States, Japan and Europe, so for those economically disadvantaged economies can be expensive to pay for all end-user licenses for these products, rather than just purchasing a license and then copying the software without paying any additional licensing fees. Some critics in developing countries, countries around the world argue that this is an indirect technology transfer tax on their countries, preventing scientific and technological progress and that they refuse to accept copyright laws when they use this type of argument in the most technologically advanced countries. This idea is often applied to patent law as well.