Since time has created everything, will it destroy everything?For example, the universe of World 10

Who told you that time creates everything?And not God?Time is a tool for human beings to determine the length of time, a conceptual term, how can it destroy everything?

Everything will change over time, that's for sure, there will be life and death!There is prosperity and decline!A truth that has remained unchanged through the ages.

There are some things that science can't explain, just as it is true that doctors can cure diseases but not save lives. Maybe there is also time travel, the reason why human beings can't invent a time machine, the biggest problem is at least we haven't been able to solve the ethical problem, such as going back to the past when you and your mother got married, so may I ask, who gave birth to you now?Who will be the one who will be born in the future?

Hehe, I guess I can't think of it even if I want to go crazy)

The above are all philosophical questions, too much, there is only one purpose, these complex things can't be understood, forget it, live a good life is the most important!If the world is really going to be destroyed, first of all, it will be human beings themselves who have created their own evils, just look at the current relationship between people.

That's for sure, there's no time where space comes from, matter. Time stopped, everything was gone, the skin was gone, where did the hair come from.

It is necessary that if there is life, there must be destruction, unless he does not begot.

Yes, time is the creator, so destruction is only a small meaning, and the vacuum is also 6b

Time and space, matter, etc. are created at the singularity, time and space, matter have no particularity, and time cannot destroy anything

Time is only one dimension.

Is there an end to the universe?: The universe is finite and boundless [like the surface of the Earth, which has a certain size (i.e., finite) but no edges. The universe is the same, it is finite, but the gravitational pull of the universe itself is so great that it bends the space in the universe back to itself (like a circle, but it is only four-dimensional).

Is there a length of time?

Time in the universe started with the universe and has been expanding. If the universe expands forever, there will be no end to time;If the universe expands to a certain limit and contracts (known as the Great Squeeze), then time has a length.

What does my presence mean to the world?: It's up to you, but it's not about me.

Did the world choose me?Or did I choose the world? : It was the world that chose you. Because there is no space outside the universe in the "place" outside the universe.

time, I can't describe that place)" There are parallel universes that are the same as our universe, and you in the parallel universe are exactly the same as you are now, and even your thoughts are the same. The future of our universe cannot be determined by you, and the universe can only develop according to its laws (including your future actions and thoughts).

Theoretically, it is possible, but it is difficult to verify with facts, and in fact it is meaningless. Just as we move in a long hollow iron pillar, we see the same thing at every moment, but the length of the iron pillar is still there. That's pretty much it.

does not exist. Time exists only because of the movement of matter. To have time, first there must be matter, and then matter has a change in motion.

Theoretically, a black hole is a point where there is matter and no time, which Hawking called the end of time. As for why black holes don't have time, I don't understand.

This kind of problem can only be guessed by scientists.

Suppose everything in the universe was static. Can you still prove the existence of time?

Suppose so, i.e., does not exist, and even if it exists, then time is static, illusory, and meaningless.

The human eye can only distinguish three-dimensional objects, not time. Can you see the stillness of a three-dimensional object and push out the stillness of a four-dimensional space? And motion is relative, so what is the so-called "rest"?

According to Einstein's general theory of relativity, everything in the universe exists relatively. It should not be possible to prove that time still exists.

If everything in the universe were static, there would be no universe now. Not to mention the existence of a discussion about whether there is time.

This sentence is the paradox, how can you be still, you still know that time stands still, your concept is wrong.

If the parents are not married, can we still prove the existence of the child?

I feel that time is the coordinate, the reference that records the process of what happens, and we will find that everything we do will be accompanied by a scale -- time, and the outcome of things is determined by us. Whether to create everything or to destroy everything, when we put these aside we will find that there is a common term time. So to speak:

It's just that everything will have a time companion in this process, which is a little explanation of the nature of time, explaining the nature of time, the essence of time is a "guide" (the process of guidance) of the "length" (all things in nature have things that guide their existence, referred to as "guide"; The thing that guides the existence of things for the first time is the essence and law, which is called "primary guidance"; Therefore, all the "events" of the book search are "guide events", which we refer to as "guides", and the process of guides is referred to as "guides"). For example, we record the "length" of the "guide" of the earth's "one revolution" 24 hours a day, and the "length" of a year's "revolution". And each "guide" (the individual who guides the being) has its own "lead"!

For example, people can "see", "hear", "smell", "eat", "think", "kick", and "touch" things at the same time, because "eyes", "ears", "nose", "mouth", "brain", "feet", and "hands" are all separate "guides", so they all have their own "guides" (time). If we want to use the "lead length" to express it in one word, we call it "lead quantity"; If we had to give a name to the "lead" of the entire "universe", let's call it the "Celestial Journey"! Then to describe the time of the entire universe, it is called:

Zeus". Creation and destruction of everything is often our own, and time is only a superficial one. It's up to you.

Time is the precipitation of history and the guide of the future. A catalyst for reality.

Time is a tree, and whenever there is a time accident, a branch with the same load will be born, and the branches will not interfere with each other, and they will not cross after the branch.

The universe is regenerational, time is distorted in absolute space, all components will enter the "end" from the "starting point" to regenerate, irreversible, we can only explore from the physical space to the physical world of the beginning of time, and the time of time and space has been repeated just like a clock, turning, decomposing and combining elements, etc., time and space are very small and infinitely many, each cycle is fixed with a different period, such as: as long as the natural decomposition of diamond, as short as the time for an electron to revolutionize one week.

Your point of view is very peculiar, but there is a logical error, there is no concept of before or after in the state of time standstill, and there is no big **before, time is generated with the big **, and there is no time before the big **. You understand time as the movement of the universe is too narrow, and time is not caused by the movement of the universe, the movement of matter itself cannot be static, such as the decay of radioactive elements, the time axis can be stretched very long, but there is no evidence that time can be completely stopped, but the observation results prove that the black hole itself is also moving, not static, and the time inside the black hole may be in a temporary stationary state.

It's good to be able to think, and this shows that students who only know how to endorse and listen to the teacher's words are better.

However, children's shoes, time cannot be discarded, were debated by physicists long before quantum theory came out. There is a person who loves physics in the post bar.,Write a book to learn the theory of relativity with me.,I suggest you take a look.。

Then we might as well think that we can look at the universe as a coordinate axis, that is, the universe is a continuous object in a four-dimensional space, and at both ends of the time axis, the universe has only one singularity, and everything is stationary, and traversing from the beginning to the end of the time axis is considered to have a flow of time. But as a whole, the universe is static.

That is, the universe has a beginning and an end, and any one of these processes is predestined. However, due to the limited ability of human observation, it is impossible to reproduce every quantum-precise motion situation, nor can it make microscopic **. This is the uncertainty of quantum theory.

Time is not a phenomenon, but a property of matter. In order to measure the order in which a substance changes, it corresponds to time. The generation time (or generation time and space) of the great ** is a kind of understanding of the current cosmology.

When you reach the singularity of the big **, all matter is reduced to one point, there is no change, and time can also be considered to be gone. If the universe will return to that big singularity, time may disappear, and it will occur in the next universe. What's more, current astronomical measurements tell us that the universe is still expanding, or even accelerating, and may never reach that singularity.

There is no question of time disappearing.

Of course, there are some other times in real life, such as psychological time, thermodynamic time, and so on. But for these times it doesn't have to be gone.

Any physical process takes place in a certain time and in a certain space, so of course, there is a "thing" called "time" in the universe (here, "thing" is a pronoun).

According to the mainstream cosmological theory, time and space are an inseparable unity, which was created at some point about 13.7 billion years ago, and therefore the theory that there was no time before the universe is established. Because the word universe contains the concept of time and space - space is space, and space is time.

Some of your beliefs are untestable and therefore do not fall under the umbrella of scientific research.

If time were to be reversed, it would be impossible to prove it, because we would not be able to observe the whole time reversal, after all, we ourselves would be reversing time as a whole, which means that we have lost all memories of this time. Thus the conclusion of this hypothesis is that it is possible for time to rewind as a whole, but because the overall regression of time cannot be observed, the overall regression of time has no meaning for us, and according to Occam's razor's principle, we can assume that it does not exist.

Time rewind for individual particles. If it is possible to rewind the time of a single particle, it is difficult to observe with our observational accuracy. According to the principle of quantum inaccuracy, it is impossible to know the precise trajectory of microscopic particles, so if a microscopic particle does not move forward along the time axis at a certain time, it is also difficult for us to observe.

So, on the other hand, what if a single particle were to move in the opposite direction along the time axis, while other particles in its vicinity were moving in the forward direction along the time axis? Einstein was at least mathematically correct when he thought that time could be considered a dimension consistent with space. In the same way, if a person is crowded with a group of people who are moving forward, can it maintain its backward trend?

It's hard, right?

So the idea is that a single particle running backwards on the time axis will be squeezed by other particles moving forward along the time axis and become forward. In order for a macroscopic object to turn back time, all the particles of the object must be reversed in the time axis.

We have not yet observed a macroscopic object moving in the opposite direction along the time axis, but this does not prove that it does not exist.

Conclusion: It is still too early to say that time can or cannot be turned back, and humans have not really understood time.

Time never goes back.