Why is it said that the relationship between the state and society determines the essence of the sta

Concept: Society refers to the whole composed of a certain economic base and superstructure, also known as social form. The state, which is the power organ of the economically dominant class to rule and manage society, is an interconnected organic whole composed of many parts.

First of all, the state is a product of the long-term development of society and an advanced form of social community. The state is subordinate to society and is a derivative of society; But at the same time, society also needs the state's rationality. Society determines the state, and the state manages society Secondly, the state is a social community formed by people in a specific society to live together and protect common interests, in this community, political life is always controlled in the hands of a certain social group, and management forms the ruling group or group of society; Because of the different people who make up the ruling group, the state has a different nature.

Actually, you can solve the problem by figuring out the concept.

The essence of the state refers to the class attribute of the state, and the relationship between the state and society refers to the social composition of the state, so that the relationship between the state and society can determine the essence of the state.

The relationship between society and the state is a lip-and-tooth relationship. Society itself is a market. The normal trading and operation of the market needs a strong backing as a guarantee. The state has such a backing.

As for the relationship between the state and society, why does it determine the essence of the state? Let's take an analogy.

If it is a capitalist market, it is a bargaining market, and as long as you don't fight, it won't care about you. And in socialist countries, because most of the bosses of the market are brothers who are backing, everyone shares equally how much income they have. So, got it?

This is in the next point of foolishness.

The relationship between the state and society is an important issue in the process of modernizing human society. The relationship between the state and society here refers to the relationship between the social governance of the state power and social autonomy under a certain social system.

Under different social systems and at different stages of social development, there are different types and models of relations between countries and societies. Since the beginning of reform and opening up, along with the continuous development of the cause of socialist modernization, China has developed from a highly centralized and unified social system under the planned economic system in the past to an increasingly diversified and pluralistic social system.

The distinction between the state and society is more in principle, system, and theory, but the problem of demarcating borders is always widespread, and it is constantly being broken through in the political practice of Western countries.

On the one hand, political equality continues to extend to society, because citizens who have obtained equal political rights will tend to use it to seek practical benefits for themselves, such as welfare policies; On the other hand, social differences will also permeate politics, and the rise of identity politics is more obvious now.

The individual relinquishes his own power and constructs the state, which gradually deviates from the original track in the process of development and becomes a power entity that overrides the individual. The awakening of the self-consciousness of ordinary people shapes society, which dissolves state control through confrontation, procrastination, inaction, etc.

In the context of such confrontation and cooperation, the family, as the common basic unit of the state and society, reflects the symbolic characteristics shared by the two, and under a shared power system, the family embodies the continuous process of dissolution and continuous reconstruction of the state and society.

Correct answer: [Key points of the answer] First of all, from the perspective of the origin of the state, the state was gradually formed after the emergence of classes, and it is the product and manifestation of irreconcilable class contradictions. This shows that the state is an instrument of class oppression.

2 points) Secondly, from the perspective of the characteristics of the state, the main components of the state are the army, police, courts, prisons and other material appendages. This shows that the state is a violent instrument of class oppression. (2 points) Again, from the point of view of the functions of the state, only the economically dominant class can hold state power.

This shows that the pre-enlightenment state is a violent tool for the economically dominant class to oppress the ruled class. (2 points).

Answer]: B This question examines the nature of the state. The origin and ingenious search of the Guoxiao Calling Calendar show that the state is essentially a class concept, an instrument of class rule and oppression, and a tyrannical chain or force organ for one class to suppress another.

Options "a", "c", and "d" are not appropriate and are excluded.