Ask about the differences. How to ask the opinions of different superiors How to ask the superiors

1.Powder and loose powder are the same, but each brand is called differently. It spreads out like flour and is dry, so it can absorb oil and set makeup after the whole makeup step is finished.

Liquid foundation is the first makeup step after a skincare product, it is liquid and is used to change the skin tone and also has a concealing effect. Pressed powder is applied over liquid foundation and also has some concealer, which is mainly used to set makeup, but it is not as dry as loose powder (or powder).

2.You can apply skin care products before doing it, or you can not apply it, but after applying, you can make the nutrition of skin care products better penetrate**. I advise you not to use water and lotions, it will be better to use a serum instead. And it's best to use the same type of serum as **!

Once you've figured it out, give me extra points!

1: Liquid foundation is the first step in makeup, and it is recommended to apply it by hand, because the temperature of the hand can make the foundation more conforming to the face. If you use a puff, you can put the puff in the refrigerator for 5 minutes, so that when you apply it, it will reduce the appearance of pores and look more natural.

The application method is from top to bottom, from middle to outside, simply from the middle of the forehead

If you are a little more proficient, you can use two kinds of foundation, one for highlighter and one for shadow . When choosing a color, one size higher than the base color is the highlight, and the lower one is the shadow. The shadow color is applied where you want the face to be smaller

The next step is to set the makeup, which is to use the powder and loose powder you said, and brush it on the face with a large brush. Then you can move on to the makeup routine below

2: As for **. It is said that at least one day a week you should sleep without wiping the sample, so that even the pores can have a chance to breathe naturally, so I am, wash my face with facial cleanser, **, and then wash my face with water and then don't apply anything

As for the question you said, it is not yet recommended to apply something else before the left ** affects the absorption

It's not easy to give advice to the boss, remember this eight-character policy: "observe the words and looks, and take the opportunity to express" - look at the manager's management style, observe what kind of person the boss is, and wait for the opportunity to move. The following is a study of how to deal with this problem according to the difference of opinion with the boss, and the relevant information has been compiled for your reference.

How to deal with disagreements with your boss: Guide your boss.

Ask your boss for your plan, and sincerely express your hope to get advice from your boss. Brightly, your boss guides you to succeed, and secretly you convey your ideas to your boss.

Disagree with your boss and deal with it: Don't reject it altogether.

Don't reject your boss's plan entirely. First of all, people have a narcissistic complex, and the boss must feel that the plan he proposes is very perfect, and if it is completely denied, he will naturally be unhappy; Secondly, there must be merit in the boss's plan, which can show that the attitude is worth learning from the subordinates, and if it is further improved, it is even more impeccable.

Disagreement with the boss Handling method: soft assimilation.

Chat with your boss often, find out your boss's preferences, understand his more acceptable way of communication, and slowly transform the relationship with your boss into a delicate relationship between friends and subordinates, then as a subordinate you have a friend relationship that your boss trusts, as a friend with the technical knowledge that your boss agrees with, and then communicate with your boss in a way that your boss is willing to accept, and your boss will definitely consider your proposal as appropriate.

Say what you think, do you have any other opinions? Or do you see if there is anything else that can be modified?

When talking to your superiors, you should be relaxed and give him face.

Just ask.

Just say; Do you still think there's anything wrong?

1. The difference between questioning and interrogation.

Ask copy

Difference Between Transcript and Interrogation Transcript:

1. Meaning. Different; 2. Second, the content of the records is different, with the interrogation records mainly recording the defendant's confessions or justifications, and the interrogation records mainly recording the evidence and testimony provided by witnesses, victims, and insiders;

3. The subject of the interrogation is different, the object of the interrogation record is the criminal defendant, and the interrogation record is only applicable to witnesses, victims, or insiders;

4. The scope of application is different, interrogation records are applicable to criminal cases, and interrogation records can be applied to criminal cases, civil cases, and administrative cases.

Article 116 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the interrogation of criminal suspects must be conducted by investigators of the people's procuratorate or public security organs. During interrogation, there must not be less than two investigators. After a criminal suspect is sent to a detention center for detention, investigators shall interrogate them in the detention center.

Interrogation records shall be written with pens, brushes, or other writing instruments that can maintain handwriting for a long time.

The content of the first part of the interrogation record should be complete, and must not be omitted.

The difference between an interrogation transcript and an interrogation transcript is:

One is that the meaning is different;

Second, the content of the records is different: the interrogation records mainly record the defendant's confessions or justifications, while the interrogation records mainly record the evidence and testimony provided by witnesses, victims, and insiders;

Third, the subjects of the interrogation are different, the object of the interrogation record is the criminal defendant, and the interrogation record is only applicable to witnesses, victims, or insiders;

Fourth, the scope of application is different, interrogation records are applicable to criminal cases and public security cases, while interrogation records can be applied to criminal, civil and administrative cases.

The intuitive judgment of the interrogation record and the interrogation record is very simple, and the words "interrogation record" or "interrogation record" are clearly printed on the first line of the first page of the transcript paper.

After making the record, the case-handling officer will hand it over to you for review and signature, and you can see the difference when you press your fingerprint. Interrogation records are used for criminal suspects who have already filed a case, and in public security cases, the public security organs absolutely prohibit the use of "interrogation records", otherwise it is an illegal act to use criminal means to handle administrative cases.

Regardless of whether it is an interrogation record or an interrogation record, as long as no criminal or administrative case is established, the record is only investigation materials and will not be archived, and if the case is established, it must be archived as evidentiary materials. In other words, whether it will have an impact on joining the army, recruiting police officers and taking civil service examinations in the future depends on whether the case is established.

Records of interrogation, also known as "records of questioning witnesses", are written records made by judicial personnel in the course of criminal proceedings on the process and content of questioning witnesses and victims. The transcript of the interrogation may be used as evidence. The law stipulates that a record shall be made of the questioning of witnesses and victims.

Interrogation records are a criminal investigation method to collect evidence from a criminal suspect after a criminal case has been filed, so the preparation of interrogation records is generally to pursue criminal responsibility (unless the case is withdrawn after ascertaining the facts).

Interrogation records are written records of the interrogation of criminal suspects by investigators and pre-trial personnel of public security organs in order to confirm the crime and ascertain the facts of the crime. It is a legally effective document, which plays an important role in obtaining evidence, comprehensively analyzing and studying the facts of the case, convicting and sentencing, summarizing the experience of handling cases, and inspecting the quality of case handling.

During the interrogation, the police came.

The procuratorate conducted the questioning of the suspect and the questioning of the BAI witness or the victim. Or the defense lawyer is suspected of a crime.

Questions between the suspect and the accused.

Depending on the identity of the parties, you can tell which is the interrogation and which is the interrogation record. The interrogation transcript does not necessarily impose some kind of punishment, but only says that the person is suspected of committing a crime.

This record is not used for general administrative punishments, and it is basically a record of interrogation.

Only criminal cases will arise.

The interrogation records were conducted by the public security and procuratorial organs against the criminal suspects, and the interrogation was.

Questioning of witnesses or victims. Or it is the defense lawyer's questioning of the suspect and the defendant.

This is a legal requirement. Interrogation records will not be recorded in an individual's personnel file, as long as they have not been criminally dealt with, they will not be counted as having a criminal record, and generally will not be found out, but now, such as going abroad, joining the army, recording police, or some units in society will require a political examination when hiring personnel, that is, go to the police station to learn about their actual performance, and the records are confidential and will not be disclosed to anyone other than the police handling the case, let alone the Internet.

Knowing that the tone is different, asking is the meaning of questioning.

There is no real difference, but it can be used to find or dig deeper. There should be nothing new.

If the same case-handling personnel conduct a second interrogation, the interrogation is often conducted for the first time where there are omissions, unreasonableness, or suspicious points. If different case-handling personnel conduct interrogations, it means that the case has already entered the next stage, and the case-handling personnel at that stage routinely interrogate mainly to see whether the statements of the person being interrogated are consistent and whether there are discrepancies, so as to decide whether to approve the proposed disposition decision. Generally speaking, the transcript of the first interrogation is more credible because the person being interrogated does not have time to make up the lie, even if he wants to lie.

The secret is known to the general public.

It loses its meaning.

There are 2 times that it is not closed.

Some have 3 more times.

Or even 4 to 5 times.

It's not very different, it's just an increase in the number of inquiries and a stronger evidence.

Zou Ji asked his wife to put the word "who" in front, and highlighted the word "Chengbei", and called himself "I" in the colloquial language.

She is confident in her appearance and has an intimate relationship with her wife (1 point). When Zou Ji asked the concubine, he put the word "who" in front of it.

and called himself "I" in writing, showing Zou Ji's self-confidence and superiority in front of his concubine (1 point). Zou Ji asked the guest.

, no longer put "who" in front, and called himself "I", showing Zou Ji's lack of self-confidence and indifference with guests.

relationship (1 point). (It is enough to answer one psychology for each point.) ）

Zou Ji's three questions and answers with his wife, concubines, and guests are detailed and omitted, with repetitions and small changes. All in all, there is no change in change, and there is a small change in the change. Blindly seeking change and becoming clueless, it is not in line with our national tradition of writing articles; But if nothing changes from start to finish, it can be boring.

And this one is just right, with both changes and trajectories. The skill of the article depends on the discretion of this kind of place. If you can change and apply this, it will be of great help to improve your writing skills.

His wife favored him, his concubine was afraid of him, and the guests begged him for something, so they praised Zou Ji.

Zou Ji wants to know the truth of the matter from different angles.

Zou Ji loves beauty and is not confident.

Differences: Criminal procedural coercive measures are physically compulsory, while investigative methods are not coercive.

Coercive measures: including custodial summons, release on bail pending trial, residential surveillance, detention and arrest.

Investigative methods include interrogation of criminal suspects, questioning of witnesses, inquests, inspections, searches, sealing, seizure of physical evidence, documentary evidence, identification, technical investigative measures, and wanted notices.

There are five types of coercive measures stipulated in China's Criminal Procedure Law:

1.Custodial summons: The method used by public security organs, people's procuratorates, or people's courts to compel criminal suspects or defendants who have not been detained or arrested to be interrogated at a designated location is the least severe type of compulsory measure;

2.Release on guarantee pending further investigation: A compulsory measure whereby the public, procuratorate, or judicial organs order a criminal suspect or defendant to provide a guarantor or pay a guarantee deposit and issue a letter of guarantee to ensure that he or she will not evade or obstruct the investigation, prosecution, or trial, and to be summoned with him;

3.Residential surveillance: A compulsory measure whereby the public, procuratorate, or judicial organs order that a criminal suspect or defendant must not leave his or her residence or designated residence without authorization, and monitor his or her movements;

4.Detention: A compulsory measure taken by the public security organs or people's procuratorates to temporarily deprive an active offender or a major suspect of his or her personal liberty in accordance with the law in the event of a statutory emergency;

5.Arrest: Compulsory measures taken by the public, procuratorate, or judicial organs to temporarily deprive criminal suspects or defendants of their personal liberty and detain them in accordance with law in order to prevent them from evading or obstructing the conduct of investigation, prosecution, or trial, and to prevent them from becoming dangerous to society.

The means of investigation are:

1. Interrogate criminal suspects.

2. Questioning witnesses and victims.

3. Inquest and inspection.

4. Search. 5. Seizure of physical and documentary evidence.

6. Identification. 7. Identification.

8. Wanted. You must know that the purpose of the criminal procedure compulsory measures is to ensure the smooth progress of the investigation and not to obstruct the investigation, otherwise the criminal procedure compulsory measures will be abolished.

If there is any difference, it is that the investigative method is the internal means of the public security organs, and the compulsory measures of criminal prosecution are measures that can only be accomplished by cooperating with the procuratorate and cooperating in the division of labor. Moreover, the compulsory measures of criminal prosecution are physically compulsory, and some of the investigative methods are not compulsory.

With regard to coercive measures, the Criminal Procedure Law has clear provisions, and there are only a few of them. And what is the specific connotation and extension of the investigative methods you are talking about, which does not seem to be the scope of criminal law in the strict sense?