Is the moon empty? How to substantiate?

I think it is; Because:

On November 20, 1969, the lunar module of "Apollo 12" "Intrepid" suddenly lost control and crashed on the surface of the moon, and recorded up to 15 minutes on the high-sensitivity seisismometer 72 kilometers away from the crash site**, if it is only 3-5 minutes at most on the earth**, scientists preliminarily conclude that the moon is a huge hollow ball.

Apollo 14 and Apollo 15 also performed the same experiments, and both obtained long-term vibrations.

On May 13, 1972, a meteorite named "Giant Elephant" by scientists struck the surface of the moon, with an energy equivalent to the power of 200 tons of TNT explosives, and the result was a three-hour shock!! Moreover, the huge moonquake shows that when the vibration reaches the interior of the moon at a distance of 35-40 km, it disappears completely.

Therefore, scientists have to admit that the surface of the moon is only a layer of spherical shell tens of kilometers thick and extremely hard. Inside the spherical shell, there is a very large hollow ball core.

There are even scientists who have boldly speculated that the moon is a supership piloted by aliens!!

But the United States did not abandon the moon landing because of this, but for another reason. In the past, the United States and the Soviet Union had unexpected encounters with UFOs when they landed on the moon. On the far side of the moon, they saw some base-like buildings, as well as many spaceships that were not from Earth.

They seem to have given up because they haven't figured out why.

No, like the Earth, it has a high density of cores.

heart, analogous to the earth, calculates the mass of the earth according to gravitation, and measures the volume of the earth, calculates the average density, for.

The density of the three major rocks on the surface does not exceed 3g cm3Therefore, it can be concluded that the density of the earth's interior is much greater than that of the three major rocks and seawater, and it is also greater than the average density, which measures the density of the center of the earth.

Reply added: Obviously, it is not ,,, the changes of the times that have changed the behavior of the United States on the road to hegemony, in fact, the earth also has the hypothesis of "hollowness".

The U.S. instrument on the moon measured the moon's vibration and only wanted to spread around. Without spreading downward, all those who think that the moon is hollow, there is gravitational pull. The gravitational pull of the Earth and the Moon is 6:1That is, the moon has a small mass. Measured by density, it is hollow.

The supplementary question asks why the United States has abandoned the moon landing. Because the United States has won the Cold War space race. Rocket ships to the moon cost a lot.

All give up in advance, this official gives the answer. It is also said to see a layman. In other words, the secret landing is all speculation, and there is no favorable evidence.

The United States and the former Soviet Union once hit the lunar surface with rockets and found that the moonquake lasted for 3 hours, while a solid body would not have this phenomenon! So it's absolutely empty, and besides, if it's solid, the gravitational force can't be so small.

The moon is not hollow, and although the moon hollow theory has many fans among the public and has been supported by some scientists, the mainstream scientific community does not share this view. In the eyes of most scientists, there is no scientific basis for the theory that the moon is hollow.

Xu Meng, a postdoctoral researcher at Macau University of Science and Technology, said in an interview with a reporter from science and technology that the so-called Apollo moonquake experiment does not mean that the moon is hollow, or that it does not reflect any internal structure of the moon, because this moonquake is only a signal transmitted back after passing through the superficial layer of the moon, and does not enter the inner depths of the moon at all.

The spectacle of the "Moon Bells".

In July 1969, during the first lunar exploration of Apollo 11, three hours after the two astronauts returned to the command module, the Intrepid lunar module suddenly lost control and crashed on the surface of the moon. The ** meter, which was placed 72 kilometers away from the crash site, recorded a ** sound that lasted for 15 minutes. Scientists analyze that if the moon is solid, this shock wave lasts up to 5 minutes.

The moonquake test was shocking.

On November 20, 1969, the American Apollo 12 astronauts conducted a man-made moonquake test on the moon.

At 4:15 p.m. on the same day, when the astronauts returned to the command module in the lunar module, they deliberately hit the lunar surface with a section of the lunar module. The result was a shocking "moonquake", in which the moon "shook" and shook for more than 55 minutes, and the curve of the moon "shaking" recorded by the sensitive lunar surface instrument showed that it took seven or eight minutes for the vibrations to start from small to maximum intensity, and then gradually weaken until they disappeared.

This phenomenon, which is absolutely impossible to happen on Earth, shocked NASA scientists once again, and they looked at each other, and none of them could give a satisfactory explanation.

The spectacle of a meteorite hitting the surface of the moon.

A NASA scientist even made a surprising statement: there may be two metal moon-seismic tectonic belts similar to beams and thousands of kilometers long inside the moon. A "long wall" on the moon is a clear sign of a moonquake.

The "Long Wall" is a vertical slope up to 300 meters high and 100 kilometers long, which is caused by the dislocation of the ground fissures on the surface of the Moon.

There are many scientists who believe that there is no lunar core inside the moon. They believe that if there is a large moonquake, the record of lunar seismic waves can determine whether there is a moon and whether there is a lunar core. Fortunately, on May 13, 1972, a huge meteorite hit the lunar surface, which was equivalent to 200 tons of TNT explosives.

The impact and vibration of the meteorite on the moon transmitted to the interior of the moon, but it did not respond like a mud cow into the sea. Doesn't this mean that the moon is a hollow and not a lunar core?

First of all, the earth is a liquid core, the average diameter of the moon is about 3476 kilometers, slightly larger than the diameter of the earth 1 4, the mass of the moon is about 735 billion tons, equivalent to 1 81 of the mass of the earth, the inner core of the moon refers to the core material of the moon. The substance is a solid, iron-rich core about 150 kilometers (150 miles) in diameter and an outer structure of a liquid iron core about 330 kilometers (205 miles) in diameter.

It is impossible for any spherical object in the universe to be hollow, including the Moon, of course. The deeper the celestial body goes inward, the greater the density and pressure.

So what is the definition of bearishness? Space seems to be empty, but in fact it is also full of matter, but the density of matter is smaller, and the entity seems to be solid, but in fact, space occupies the vast majority. Like the atom, it is composed of an extremely small nucleus and a huge space.

As for the moon, its interior must be solid, for the simple reason that if the moon is seen as a system, then it is like any system in nature, with a high density of the center, and as it moves away from the center, the density decreases until it is consistent with the surrounding space. As for the impact test, it cannot be proved that it is hollow, because there are many factors that affect the vibration, and one factor cannot be used to explain the problem.

There is some evidence that the moon is empty, but no one can explain what mysterious things are hidden inside the moon. Some scientists have proposed that the moon is a space station built by aliens, and its interior is inhabited by aliens. But this is also only a hypothesis, and there is no favorable evidence to prove its authenticity.

I saw such a problem again, how can I say it? I have to admire the ability of some people on the Internet to tell right and wrong and exaggerate.

One thing is enough to shoot the arguments of some mystics. What is the density of the Moon? per cubic centimeter.

The dominant theory for the formation of the moon is now the theory of the Great Collision. It is believed that the Moon experienced a major collision in the early days of the Earth's formation, in which material from the Earth's mantle was knocked out and recondensed to form the Moon. What is the density of the mantle below the Moho surface?

per cubic centimeter. There's no significant difference between the two, right? You can definitely shoot the mysticists.

The source of the mysticists' claim is that when they detected moonquakes, they found that the shaking lasted longer than expected, so scientists thought that it might be caused by a hole in the interior of the moon. But in the eyes of some people on the Internet, the moon is hollow. I tried to apply the logic of these people to the earth, because of the existence of the caves, can I say that the earth is hollow?

I'm sure no one believes it, how can it still be widely spread on the moon?

The modern Internet makes people's tastes heavier and heavier, and without the end of the world, aliens come to the earth, and nibiru hitting the earth will not be able to attract people's attention. As a result, there is a very strange phenomenon, there are countless shocking things on the Internet, but the details of life are gradually ignored. It is worth reflecting.

Didn't you say that the center of the earth is iron?