Truth can be falsehood under certain conditions

It can only be said that truth is truth under certain conditions, and false under any other conditions. For example, it is true that the earth revolves around the sun, and this truth can only be established under the condition that the sun is used as a reference, and if this condition is changed, it is a fallacy. If you want to use the earth as a reference, you can also say that the sun revolves around the earth, and if you take the moon as a reference, the laws of motion of these two things are more complicated.

Why is there no end to knowing things? After learning Leonardo da Vinci's painting of eggs, you will understand.

If the Earth is used as a reference for observation, then the Earth is motionless and the Sun revolves around the Earth. The truth that the earth revolves around the sun is false.

There is no end to the knowledge of things, but at the current level of human knowledge, the knowledge of something can reach its limit.

The ancients believed that fire was a god and truth in their eyes, but we think it is ridiculous. We now think we've discovered many mysteries of the universe. It is just as ridiculous when future generations look at the truths we have concluded.

Hehe, it's very simple, there is no universal truth in this world, truth can only exist locally, and it is very simple to explain your problem with this point of view.

You have to put this sentence in a specific environment, it is not as good as the general superstition in feudal society, and he will not believe in your so-called science.

There are partial truths and absolute truths.

Summary: The view that a fallacy can be transformed into truth under certain conditions isEpistemologyWhat is put forward is, to be precise, "the mutual transformation of truth and falsehood".

This part of the content is mainly the attribute of truth, which belongs to the "practical view" part of epistemology. Marxist philosophyIncluding materialismDialecticsEpistemologyHistorical materialismThe four lifting parts belong to the epistemological content.

Specifically, there are the following core views: truth and its objectivity, the absoluteness and relativity of truth and their dialectical relationship, truth and fallacy, success and failure.

The details are that there is a complex relationship between truth and falsehood, which exists in comparison and develops in struggle.

A dialectical relationship of the unity of opposites has been formed. Fallacy is a perception that is contrary to objective things and the laws of their development, and is a distorted reflection of objective things as they are.

Truth and falsehood are both opposites and unified, first of all, truth and fallacy are opposites, and in terms of the understanding of a certain scope and a certain objective object, the opposition between the two is absolute, has essential boundaries, and cannot be confused.

Second, truth and falsehood are closely related, and they depend on each other and transform each other.

Truth exists in comparison with falsehood, and without falsehood, there is no truth, and truth contains aspects or factors of error that will be exposed later, and in falsehood there are also elements or germs of truth that will be revealed later.

Again, the development of truth is also achieved through the struggle against falsehood.

As objective conditions change, truth becomes false, and the main reasons for this are as follows:

1. Exceeding the conditions and scope of its application.

2. It deviates from the unity of subjectivity and objectivity, understanding and practice of concrete history. Truth is concrete, applicable to certain conditions and scopes, beyond which even a small step can be taken to turn truth into a fallacy.

Truth and falsehood are opposites. Its antagonism is manifested in the fact that as far as a certain scope and a certain objective object are concerned, truth is truth and fallacy is fallacy, and there is an essential difference between the two, and they cannot be confused. Its unity is manifested in the following ways:

First, the two exist in comparison with each other, and develop through struggle.

Second, the two are transformed into each other under certain conditions.

Truth and Falsehood Transform Each Other:1. If it goes beyond the scope and conditions of application, the truth will become a fallacy.

2. If we don't look at the changes in the posture of the real thing, the truth will be transformed into a fallacy.

3. If the system of truth is arbitrarily dismembered, the truth will be transformed into a fallacy.

4. Summing up lessons and lessons from erroneous understanding, we will get a correct understanding, and fallacies will be transformed into truth.

5. Constantly correcting errors and discovering them is the basic way for people to obtain the truth.

There is no difference between the nature of truth and falsehood.

Truth and falsehood are epistemology.

in a pair of categories. Truth is the correct reflection of objective things and their laws. A fallacy (error) is a distorted reflection of objective things and their laws. The purpose of knowledge is to grasp the truth and guide practice.

In the process of understanding, people can gain the truth, but they will inevitably make mistakes. Therefore, truth and falsehood are an inevitable pair of contradictions in the process of knowing. There are social, class, and epistemological roots in the error of human understanding.

The people's understanding of objective things is always carried out under certain historical conditions, and it is inevitable that they will be influenced by the social and historical conditions of the time, material production, scientific and technological development, and other social practices.

Level Limits. In a class society, people of different classes will inevitably have different understandings when they observe things from the perspective of different class interests and class status.

There is a strict line between truth and falsehood.

Therefore, truth and falsehood are not interpenetrating, intermingling and intertwining. It's not that you have me, I have a frank relationship that allows Sun Sou to Kaizen.

Wrong point of view. The distinction between falsehood and truth is relative and conditional.

Truth is the correct reflection of objective things and their laws.

Fallacy is a distorted reflection of objective things and their laws.

Truth and falsehood are opposites.

a) Opposites. The opposition between truth and falsehood is manifested in whether it is consistent with objective things and their laws.

2) Unification. 1) Interdependence.

Truth and falsehood exist in comparison and develop in struggle.

2) Mutual transformation.

The Transformation of Truth into Falsehood: Truth is concrete, and beyond the scope of application, it becomes false; Truth is comprehensive, and severing the inner connection becomes a fallacy. Truth is dynamic, and backwardness or transcendence of reality can become a fallacy.

The Transformation of Falsehood into Truth: Returning to the scope of application, falsehood will become truth; Fallacies are often the precursors of the right; Truth can be obtained by criticizing fallacy.

The principle of the dialectical relationship between truth and falsehood is of great practical significance

1) The opposition between truth and falsehood requires us to have the courage to uphold the truth and correct errors.

2) The unity of truth and falsehood requires us to be good at helping others correct their mistakes.

Test Question Analysis: Truth is the correct understanding of objective things, and fallacy is the reflection of distortions and errors in things. aIt is false, because any truth has its own sphere of application, and therefore there is no absolute truth; bFalsehood, truth and falsehood are conditional.

Let's start with the truth.

Truth is a subjective and objective understanding.

Practice is the basis of understanding.

Practice is socially historical, and on the basis of a certain level of practice, it is limited by people's subjective and objective conditions, and truth is conditional and concrete.

Truth is always in a certain process, under certain conditions, and without this process and condition, it is a fallacy.

So the subject's point of view is wrong.

Answer]: B The dialectical materialist view of truth holds that: (1) any truth is concrete, and the justification is applied to specific conditions and scopes; (2) In the process of the development of truth, if we copy the theories of the past, or force the things that can only be done in the future to be implemented in the current reality, the number of truths will be transformed into fallacies; (3) Truth is a comprehensive enactment, and if one aspect is isolated and exaggerated, so that it is opposed to other principles, it will lose its original truth and become a fallacy.

Answer] Whisper: B

There is a relationship of opposition and unity between truth and error, and truth and error exist by comparison, and struggle with each other to develop sensitively, which is the embodiment of the principle of dialectical luck and fortune branch relationship, so choose B.

Under certain conditions, truth will be transformed into falsehood, if it is because of () trembling and coarse.

a.Truth is objective.

b.Truth is concrete.

c.Truth contains falsehood.

d.There is no definite line between truth and falsehood.

Correct answer: B