What do you think about the fact that the parent committee charges 110 yuan per parent to buy live s

As we all know, in the first two or three months, the teachers were collectively incarnated as "anchors", and all the students went to evening classes, but in the past two days, a screenshot in the parent group of a key middle school in Nanjing has caused heated discussions!

Event details: On June 19, a WeChat group notice from the parents of students in Nanjing Key Middle School to collect relevant "epidemic prevention fees" was hotly discussed! According to the text information in the screenshot, the so-called "Epidemic prevention fee"YesIncluding the teacher's class fee during class, various live broadcast equipment fees, etc., 110 yuan needs to be charged to each student.

It is worth mentioning that the children of the families who are subsistence allowances and teachers can be exempted from handing in, and some parents have reacted with **".Just one first-year high school class 12 classes charged more than 60,000 yuan

According to the follow-up notice, the school's response was ".The PTA misunderstood the message of the school and the teacherAnd that's how it goes, the end.

I have to say that as a high school teacher, I have also been live on the Internet for more than two or three months some time ago, how come our school does not have the so-called "epidemic prevention fee"? And according to my understanding, because it was the Spring Festival holiday at that time, many teachers returned to their rural hometowns for the New Year, including myself, and only brought a mobile phone back. The home is relatively remote, there is no network, so you need to open some traffic**, I used to pay twenty or thirty yuan a month, I still remember that I used more than 300 yuan in March, but these expenses, each of our teachers basically did not mention it to the school, and then in April, back to school, the school also carried out the corresponding subsidies, which can be said to be very humane.

Question Reflection: What is more noticeable is that even if this matter is true, it is reasonable! Among them, low-income families can be exempted from fees, but why are teachers' children also exempted? <>

From its establishment to its current development, the Parent Committee has long been out of its essence!

Although the fee was finally refunded in the midst of doubts, one thing has to be said that it is understandable that low-income families can be free of charge when they are originally collected, but what is the saying that teachers' children can not be charged? Teachers don't care if they earn more or less, after all, they have a stable income, but they don't pay just because they are teachers' children? Do you let other students' parents have a balance in their hearts, and you slip to the extreme.

The live broadcast is based on the national requirements, the equipment should be provided by the school, I don't think it should be asked for from the parents of the students, if the parent committee has the ability, there is ** can sponsor, or which parents are willing, but if the mandatory fee should be unreasonable.

The parent committee charges each parent 110 yuan to buy live broadcast equipment for teachers, which I think is unreasonable, and imposes the matter of buying equipment on parents and increases the burden on parents.

I don't agree, teachers can live education, but the money should not be paid by parents, I personally think that live classes are not efficient for primary and junior high school students.

I think that even if the teacher wants to teach live, the money should not be paid by the parents, if it is arranged by the school, it should be paid by the school or the education department.