Economist Wang Fuzhong believes that peasants sweating profusely are lazy and stupid , do you agree

Economist Wang Fuzhong is worthy of praise for doing many economic theories, otherwise he would not have his current status, but his public statements are indeed debatable.

For example, he said that the peasants have little to do with the grain we eat, and he actually wants to express this sentence: The real guarantee of the country's grain does not depend on the peasants' cultivation with their backs to the loess facing the sky, but on the operation of modern agricultural machinery, and in addition, a large part of China's grain security comes from imports, but this Professor Wang did not explain while saying these words, in fact, he still has to reach a situation where he is not shocking and endless, and it is not an exaggeration to say that it is self-hype. <>

What disgusted the majority of farmers the most was that when the farmers were asked to contribute, he actually said: There is almost no contribution! This sentence has been divorced from the actual situation, although modern food security does rely on mechanization, but from the past to the present our food security is a gradual development process, in the past years, how can we survive without farmers?

Even the production and cultivation of the peasants now is also a beneficial food supplement, at least they can feed themselves, which is also to reduce the burden on the country, and to reduce the burden is to make a contribution. <>

In addition, Wang Fuzhong has a point of view: the hard work of farmers itself is not necessarily worthy of respect! In fact, what he wants to emphasize in this sentence is that you can't use blind force to farm, but I don't think it needs to be expressed in this way, and it can even be said that it is a misguided value of values, and the hard work and efforts made by anyone under realistic conditions are worthy of respect.

Because in addition, he also thinks that it is laziness and stupidity for farmers to sweat profusely, and this sentence also exposes that Professor Wang has been separated from the people for too long. Ordinary peasants, how can they change the reality of hard work through wisdom? I think this is not just a problem for the peasants, but a common problem for the whole society, and this problem should not be thrown only at the peasants.

Therefore, I think Wang Fuzhong has no problem with farmers' farming from the perspective of his economic theory, but he should not express his views through this kind of grandstanding, there should still be an essential difference between professors and Internet celebrities, otherwise how can everyone agree with you? Professor Wang should turn his economic theory into an output of ideas that are easily accepted by farmers, so that it can really contribute to the change of agriculture, rural areas and farmers.

I disagree. I think that the peasants' sweating is limited by their knowledge and identity, not that they are lazy and stupid, they also want to make a lot of money and have a life as a city person, but because of the limitations of their identity and knowledge, they can't do it, only sweat profusely.

I don't agree, the people take food as the sky, and the farmers use their hard hands to provide us with sufficient food, so that the whole society does not have to worry about hunger, so that there is the development of industry and science and technology, so the farmers are the group that makes the greatest contribution to the society.

I don't agree, he thinks too highly of himself. Would he still be able to sit and talk if the peasant didn't sweat profusely? He has already drunk the wind, don't eat a little culture, and forget about Ben.

The way out for agriculture is modernization: mechanization, ecology, and intelligence. The Netherlands, Japan, Israel are all role models, you are an economist and you should have something to do in this area, how can you scold the peasants? He is our food and clothing parents, and scolding the peasants is scolding your parents.

From the perspective of the future, 'the so-called economists are lazy and stupid'. Because economists are not needed in the future.

These professors always think that they are stupid when they look at the problem in depth. The peasants are a big group, and they have everything, not that you can do anything if you are smart. Many suburban farmers are richer than citizens.

Economists are fake, Wang Fuzhong is mentally ill, who dares to agree with the of psychopaths? Unless also mentally ill.

I don't agree, without the sweat of the peasants, how can he feed his stomach. I can't fill my stomach, and I still have the money to go to college. Could it be that his parents are aliens who don't eat fireworks in the world, and did he Wang Fuzhong jump out of a stone?

It's also an economist, I don't even know the root, I'm embarrassed to say it.

Wang Fuzhong is a member of the Communist Party, but he represents himself, cannot represent the party, and should be expelled.

He always said that the peasants were stupid, and in my personal opinion, the word expert did not match him. Maybe he broke through the earth.

Tell him to do farm work for half a day, and then ask him if he is sweating.

What fools are attacking Wang Fuzhong out of context, do you really know Wang Fuzhong? Have you seen his full remarks? The clown is illiterate [don't go in front] [don't go in front] [don't go in front].

Wang Fuzhong said that he has certain reasons, and whether he is right or not is determined by time.

Wang Fuzhong is not a human being, and he does not eat the fireworks of the world.

Identity. Maybe that's life.

Does it make sense to discuss this kind of topic?

I am a peasant, and I am the Great Khan.

What else is there to say about this, go up and smoke your mouth wide.

Wang Fu eats inside and out, ungrateful, self-assured, do you agree.

The children of the landlord's family are just different, okay....Very good....Very good