Try to find the remainder of x 111 x 31 x 13 x 9 x 3 divided by x 1.

Updated on technology 2024-05-26
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    (x^111 + x^110) -x^110 + x^109) +x^109 + x^108) -

    x^33 + x^32) -x^32 + x^31) +x^13 + x^9 - x^3)

    In the above equation, all but the last three are already divisible by (x+1). Let's consider the last three next.

    x^13 + x^9 - x^3

    x^13 + x^12) -x^12 + x^11) +x^11 + x^10) -x^10 + x^9) +2x^9 - x^3)

    In the above equation, all but the last term are already divisible by (x+1). Let's consider the latter two items next.

    2x^9 - x^3

    2(x^9 + x^8) -2(x^8 + x^7) +2(x^5 + x^4) -2(x^4 + x^3) +x^3

    In the above equation, all but the last term are already divisible by (x+1). Let's consider the last item.

    x^3 (x^3 + x^2) -x^2 + x) +x + 1) -1

    Therefore, the final covariance is -1

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    x^(n+1)+x^n=x^n(x+1)

    x+1)|(x^(n+1)+x^n)

    That is, make up x (n+1) + x n shape.

    Original = (x 111 + x 110) - (x 110 + x 109) + (x 109 + x 108).

    Remainder x 13 + x 9-x 3

    x^13+x^12)-(x^12+x^11)+(x^11+x^10)-(x^10+x^9)+2x^9-x^3

    Remaining 2x 9-x 3

    2(x^9+x^8)-2(x^8+x^7)+.2(x^5+x^4)-2(x^4+x^3)+x^3

    surplus x 3 (x 3 + x 2) - (x 2 + x) + (x + 1) - 1 surplus - 1

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Because the equivalents must be constants, the result of substituting x=-1 is that the odd exponent does not matter.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    x 111 - x 31 + x 13 + x 9 - x 3 x 31 * (x 80-1) + x 3 (x 10-1) + x 9 because.

    x^80-1=(x-1)(x^79+x^78+..x 1+1) x 10-1 is also divisible by the anterior band.

    So left x 9

    x^9-1+1=(x-1)(x^8+x^7+..1) +1 repents of the lack of 1 in the fierce reed

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    x 285 x 83 x 71 x 9 x 3 divided by x 1

    Solution 1: x 285 x 83 x 71 x 9 x 3 3 (x 285 1) (x 83 1) (x 71 1) (x 9 1) (x 3 1) 4

    Because x 285 1, x 83 1, x 71 1, x 9 1, x 3 1 are divisible by x 1.

    So, the remainder of the original formula divided by x 1 is 4

    Solution 2 is governed by the remainder theorem, where the remainder is equal to x 285 x 83 x 71 x 9 x 3 3 at x 1, i.e.

    Remainder 1285 183 171 19 13 3 4

    Comment: Among the two solutions to this problem, solution 1 is to decompose the part of the original formula that can be divisible by x 1 through identity deformation, and the rest is the remainder Solution 2 is to find the remainder through the remainder theorem, which is the general method of this kind of problem, and it is necessary to be proficient

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Let f(x)=x243

    x81+x27

    x9+x3x=q(x)(x-1)+r, then f(1)=q(1) 0+r=r, i.e.: r=f(1)=1243

    So the answer is: 6

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Summary. 3x + (11-x) = 29 solutions.

    Dear, the above is the specific process and solution ideas, which step do you not understand, I can help you explain yo Is that so? Classmates are absolutely fine, do you have any special requirements? <>

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Because it is two absolute values.

    Therefore, the two sides can be squared at the same time to get x -18x+81=x -26x+169, and the transfer of the term will be defeated and the same kind of term can be combined.

    That is, there is (26-18) x = 169-81 = 88, and the solution is x=88 8 = 11

Related questions
10 answers2024-05-26

1) Because x+1 x=3, (x+1 x) 2=3 2=9

And because (x+1 x) 2=x 2+1 (x 2)+2*x*1 x=x 2+1 (x 2)+2=9 >>>More

9 answers2024-05-26

a=1/2x3/4x5/6x7/8...x99 100 assumes a number b

b=2/3x4/5x6/7x8/9...x98 99 then axb = 1 100 >>>More

13 answers2024-05-26

If you first take the value of x as 1, then the left and right sides of the equation become: 1+2+1=a0+0+0+0+0+0, so a0=4, and you take the value of x to 0, then the equation becomes: 0+0+1=a0-a1+a2-a3+a4-a5, that is: >>>More

21 answers2024-05-26

This is the content of simple math in the fifth grade of primary school, which is generally solved by multiplication commutative law associative law and distribution rate, and the specific solution process is as follows: >>>More

12 answers2024-05-26

The original inequality is shifted to obtain:

2x-3)/(x-1) -1<0 >>>More