What do you think of the news that quantum processing may be going on in the brain ?

The stream of consciousness is the quantum system at work.

It's pure entertainment, and human beings will never be able to figure out what the hell and what's going on.

This is a "high trick", if the quanta outside the brain can't be figured out, the quanta in the brain will be done first, and whoever doesn't share it will use the brain to experiment.

The core of quantum processing is quantum entanglement, and an enzyme-catalyzed reaction destroys pyrophosphate ions, producing two phosphate ions, forming quantum entangled pairs, which can be used as qubits. This phosphate pair binds to extracellular calcium ions to form the Posner molecule, which retains nuclear spin entanglement. For a problem, to bring all the ideas together and really do quantum processing, requires some kind of quantum entanglement and subsequent measurements.

It's not that you shouldn't have the qualifications to do this. But let's talk about the historical insights into humanity itself, especially the human brain, and the will. In fact, in the Middle Ages, there was a saying that God created man, which was essentially to serve religion, but in essence, it was a defense of the sanctity of human beings (inappropriate words) and function (again complaining about inappropriate words).

There is news that there is a quantum entanglement effect inside the human brain, and that the human brain applies a set of natural quantum entanglement algorithms, which is suspected of defending the advanced qualifications of the human brain. To put it nicely, it is a kind of re-study and exploration of human brain function and human cognitive ability and human potential. Just as a high-ranking answer gets more questioning, a high-level interpretation of something (like the example here) gets more reverse research, which in turn gets more funding.

As for the other opinions, I don't understand it.

From a physicist's point of view, the fundamental problem is decoherence time. Both superposition states and quantum entanglement are very fragile phenomena. How fragile is it?

It's as fragile as acrobats riding a wheelbarrow on a high-flying tightrope stacking arhats. The slightest distraction and you lose your balance. In a quantum system, even the slightest interference such as heat and mechanical vibration can cause the quantum state to be "decoherent" into a prosaic and ordinary state.

The information stored in the quantum state is lost and dissipated in the surrounding environment.

Not only may there be quantum effects in the brain, but there may even be some quantum computing, such as quantum search algorithms, which can quickly perform database searches. Traditional computers are very poor at recognizing faces, but humans are accustomed to face recognition and will never recognize the wrong person.

Quantum entanglement operations also require energy, but the energy required may require special transformations, in a sense, it may have different "energy levels", and the higher the energy level, the more specific and clear the quantum simulation will be, and the faster it will be. At present, the maintenance time of quantum entanglement effect in the development of quantum chips is relatively short, perhaps because the energy of quantum computing at the microscopic level cannot keep up, resulting in its short maintenance and rapid breaking, resulting in difficulty in improving computing efficiency. If the microscopic energy transfer of quantum entanglement operations keeps up, the speed and efficiency of the operation may also be greatly improved.

When the qubits are greatly improved, it may be found that maintaining the durability of the operation will be an obvious problem, and then it may be studied to maintain the special energy required for quantum entanglement operations, as well as the increase of the energy level, but of course it may not be.

At present, the neuroscience community does not have a definitive conclusion on the neural basis of memory storage, but it is basically recognized that the connections between neurons are significant, but we have not figured out how to achieve them. But in any case, the concept of quantum borrowed in quantum computers may still be related to quantum mechanics, but it should only be used to explain memory.

I believe that quantum entanglement is essentially a manifestation of the holographic nature of the system, and the simulation enhancement of its essential operation may be the deepening of the impression of a similar person, and the clarity of the details of the image. The current way of quantum chip computing may still follow the path of binary digital chips, which re-restores information in low dimensions, although it is simpler and easier to use, but it also discards most of the computing potential of quantum computing. In the future, a more advanced way of using quantum information should be to directly correspond to quantum information without base conversion, so as to transmit information more efficiently and accelerate computing and simulation.

Programming at that time was naturally completely different from what it is now, and it may be similar to some parts of traditional culture. As for quantum chips based on quantum entanglement, such as the research results of IBM in the United States and the University of Science and Technology of China in China, I think it should be very suitable for running deep learning, because it is very close to the mechanism of human consciousness computing. Based on quantum chips, it may be possible to create a real artificial intelligence with initial self-awareness, but it may also be the combination of electronic chips and quantum chips to form its computing system.

At that time, quantum chips may gradually discover a programming system that is completely different from the current programming logic structure of electronic chips, which can make it more suitable for computing to give full play to the performance of quantum chips. And this programming system may be a language with a holistic, chaotic character.

It's absurd to deny the relationship based on time difference – are quanta and neurons the same thing? Is the work of neurons determined by only two subatoms? If the neurons work at the quantum level, will there be other complex links in the middle that cause time delays?

Moreover, in the phenomenon of quantum entanglement, it takes no time for two subatoms to communicate at all, so how can there be a millionth of a second? The development of biology needs to be supported by physics, and many methods and data in biology are too crude to study the human brain, so in order to explain the phenomenon of thinking, it is also necessary to promote the balanced development of disciplines and achieve reasonable docking before great results can be produced.

I think that if the brain really runs at the atomic level, we should have a deeper understanding of the brain and consciousness at the current level of development of atomic physics. There must be a vacancy that humanity has not yet touched, affecting everything. So don't believe any journal articles, the human brain is a multidisciplinary field of research, and no one can say anything without particularly revolutionary advances in understanding.

Suggest a point of view, for informational purposes only. In traditional Chinese culture, the concept of "qi" is mentioned as "field" according to modern science. There may be an unknown force influencing everything around us. Guess, FYI.

The reaction time of neurons does not represent the entire thought process, and I have also read this report, and the articles in Nature are very valuable. It is quite possible that there are no quantum phenomena at the level of consciousness. However, it is important to note that no experiment can fully prove that all thought processes are independent of quantum effects, and we will not discuss free will and determinism, physics is physics, and we must speak with experiments, and it is really difficult to say for sure until we make strong experiments.

I think our brain has something to do with quantum mechanics, because a lot of times we need to use quantum mechanics when our brains think, and I think a lot of our brain structures are derived from quantum mechanics.

Every cell of the human brain is filled with quantum mechanical mechanisms, and of course there are quantum mechanical mechanisms in the functioning of the human brain, and there is already evidence that the human sense of smell involves quantum mechanics.

It doesn't matter, because I feel like our brains are naturally formed.

No. Our brain is a separate organ that has nothing to do with the quantum field, and it has no connection to it.

No, according to biologists, our brains exist independently and are not based on quantum fields, so this is just a rumor.

According to the current scientific research, there is no relationship between the brain and the quantum field.

In layman's terms, the human soul is quantum technology, and quantum physics helps to understand the decision-making behavior of the human brain.

The so-called quantum master equation allows us to describe the interaction between the social system and its environmental base, as well as the personal preferences of voters. Applying the principles of quantum information theory to model the brain has opened up the quantum AI-like domain school, in which machine learning uses algorithms provided by quantum mechanics to work.

I can't answer anything, because people are still ignorant of the physics of the measuring banquet, and I don't know which science and answer model scientist proposed such a good idea, and proposed this dream technology.