Geely car or BYD car is better

From the perspective of corporate culture and enterprise development strategy: 1. Compared with BYD Automobile, Geely Automobile has learned the strategic transformation in the fierce market competition, that is, it is not a simple competition, but the upgrading of products and services.

2. Geely Automobile understands the cultivation and innovation of talents. The so-called BYD's fully imitated products and Geely's partial imitation and local original products are examples of whether and how to innovate. Geely has put a lot of effort into innovation.

At the Detroit Auto Show, Geely's BMBS technology was a testament to Geely's independent innovation.

3. Geely Automobile's research and development of its own automotive technology has never stagnated. We can know from the technology that Geely Automobile has demonstrated at major exhibitions in recent years that Geely Automobile is doing its best not to fall into the embarrassing realm of paying "patent fees" to others.

4. Geely Automobile has made great efforts in the export of automobiles. The ** of the 21st century is cosmopolitan and also going out**. Geely is expanding its territory overseas.

BYD is much younger than Geely in the automobile industry, but young does not mean backward, it can be said that the independent brand has not been like BYD, only F3 a model has achieved more than 100,000 sales in more than 1 year, which is a great progress for the independent brand, and BYD in the F3 soon on the market exposed problems quickly solved by the manufacturer, indicating that the manufacturer attaches great importance to their products, for consumers to have a lot of confidence to support BYD. And BYD Auto has not slowed down, this year's F1, F6 will bring a major impact to the car market, and with its advantages in the battery field to create F3 electric vehicles. Now talking about Geely, I think Geely cars are currently in the hearts of the public are poor quality and other bad impressions, so at present, Geely should improve its position in the hearts of the Chinese people, to promote themselves, and to solve these problems from the improvement of after-sales service hardware and software, the level of maintenance personnel, and change the existing sales model.

In terms of development prospects, I am more optimistic about BYD. In fact, if you go to the forum, you will know that the posts in one section of F3 will surpass Geely, and F3 is just a BYD model. As a brand younger than Geely, it is not to be underestimated to surpass Geely's strength in such a short period of time.

Although I choose the latter between F3 and Vision, it is only in the design concept that I do not agree with BYD's current approach, if BYD can get rid of the bad habit of blindly imitating, the development prospects will be more optimistic than now. Moreover, BYD's marketing concept of the lowest profit and the highest cost performance is still very popular in the domestic market, even if it is Chery, the boss of its own brand that has been rolled off the assembly line in millions of quantities, the first 100,000 volumes are not as fast as BYD. BYD, whose design concept is not mature, has chosen the right path in terms of marketing concept, and it is really suitable for the current situation in China.

Judging from the current models launched by the two brands, Geely is slightly better than BYD in terms of reliability and stability.

Geely was founded in 1986, while BYD was founded in 1995. From the perspective of birth history, Geely's development history is earlier than BYD.

Although Geely mainly tends to make family cars, it is not only a family car, Geely has invested a lot of energy in technology research and development. BYD and Geely's R&D has doubled, it can be seen that the two are not in the same order of magnitude at all, and the more input, the more output, so from the perspective of the car-making technology and future development potential of the two, BYD and Geely do still have a certain gap. For a car company, if you want to see who is more powerful, in fact, the core point is to look at the R&D investment of the car company, because only through R&D investment can we master more advanced car-making technology and be invincible in the increasingly fierce market competition.

The more input, the more output, so from the perspective of the car-making technology and future development potential of the two, there is still a certain gap between BYD and Geely.

Geely was born and made a fortune by building low-end cars. In order to get rid of the low-end, low-quality, low-price Geely. simply convert the name of Geely to the company, and not hang it in the back of the car.

Emgrand, Global Eagle, British brand to enhance their own brand and quality. Driving a car with the Emgrand trademark is definitely better than a car with the Geely trademark. The return rate is much higher, and it is much more upscale!

Geely's successful acquisition of Volvo has improved itself a lot in all aspects. I think it's auspicious!

It's not good, remember to learn to repair the car before buying.

BYD is a little better, Geely's is expensive and not good.

Geely, a good name, b y d, intriguing.

<> BYD. Compared to Geely, which one do you think has more development potential? First of all, Geely, as a private enterprise, is quite successful, whether it is a variety of acquisitions, or the incubation of high-end brands, it can be said that whether it is from enterprise operation to model layout research and development are quite powerful.

It can be said that it is the best of the four small powers, but under the almost perfect surface, you can still see Geely's small problems, of course, my personal opinion. First of all, Geely still has too little core technology, although after the acquisition of Volvo, the series of models have been upgraded in all aspects, but in the final analysis, there are still too few power combinations that can really be handled. Although there are many models, most of them are old wine in new bottles.

Personally, I feel that Geely is more like a Volkswagen group.

Product power is indeed there, but what is more brilliant should be the marketing ability, but in any case, the comprehensive ability is the strongest! Geely Automobile.

Financially strong. From the acquisition of Volvo to the holding of a large stake in Mercedes-Benz, to the acquisition of the supercar Lotus, the vision behind it is really unimaginable. The pattern of leadership represents everything and determines the direction of a brand.

The second thing to talk about is BYD, which can be said to be the most special one among the four small powers. Although the technical performance of fuel vehicles is average, it can be said that in new energy, "master the core technology". Whether it's a bus, a car, a truck.

BYD's new energy technology has been recognized, which has even attracted the attention of international manufacturers, Mercedes-Benz and Toyota. BYD's core technologies are particularly noteworthy, and it can be said that it is the fastest-growing and most prominent car company among the four small powers. Coupled with the policy support of new energy, BYD can be said to have a particularly strong potential in the future!

But I personally think that BYD will be even better if it can make further efforts in other new energy fields, and even further research on fuel engines. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages, Geely's comprehensive ability is strong, BYD's new energy is slippery, you want to say that one has more potential, and it is impossible to argue for a while, but in the future, these must be the existence of the handle.

BYD's development is a little better, this kind of car is a domestic brand, good performance, low fuel consumption, economical, moderate, and BYD is also developing smoothly in the field of new energy.

It must be BYD, because he is now developing new energy vehicles, as well as electric vehicles, which is really amazing.

I think BYD has development potential, because now BYD has invested in more and more enterprises, and their cars are very cost-effective.