Please ask the Pentax 20x60 telescope and the Centron 15x70 telescope

If it's more than 1,000, it should still be okay, or maybe good.

But for this kind of large, tripod desktop, in fact, the opposite, because for the desktop telescope, if made into binoculars, the sturdiness is greatly reduced, so to speak, for the desktop telescope without design flaws, a price of desktop monocular, the solidity is actually more than 3000 price of desktop large binocular. Not to mention the portability and multi-purpose advantages of the desktop large monocular.

Therefore, although each choice is not perfect, for example, although the desktop monocular has many of the above obvious advantages, it lacks a three-dimensional sense of observation, but in the face of this gap, the current mainstream is still the monotube table. So I suggest you still ask the merchant if there is a single-tube such desktop product. It might be more suitable.

So I personally feel that this product may be good, but the direction of this choice may not be good. If you are interested in this aspect, you can go to Popular Optics to take a look, there are some knowledge introductions, including some discussions, which may also be helpful to you.

20 by 60 if you like caliber, 15 by 70 if you like focal length

First of all, Russia does not have the brand of Begoth, but is used in domestic production, so there is no real or fake;

This just shows that the domestic military industry is actually very good, many people are superstitious about foreign products, the cost performance is really not good, not all products are domestic, for example, I used to buy a military telescope produced in Taobao on a "Desert Gold Sports Optics" store has been using, are very good ......

It's a big caliber, so it must not be suitable for hand, and you have to find a tripod to support, I personally think it's inconvenient, and then this Xingtron brand, no, it's mainly low-end mirrors.

From the telescope visibility coefficient, 15x70=, the two are about the same. Judging from the twilight coefficient, the two are also about the same. As a result, the details observed by the two telescopes are comparable.

However, the diameter of the 15x70 exit pupil is 70 15 = larger than 20x50, the magnification is relatively small, and the comfort of 15x70 is better than that of 20x50 when observing in the hand, the magnification is low, and the impact of hand shaking is relatively small. Overall, 15x70 is a bit better.

If the optical quality of 20x50 is much better than that of 15x70, the observation effect is naturally 20x50.

SKYMASTER 15X70 large-aperture telescope multi-layer coating, high-quality BAK-4 prism group, large-aperture objective lens suitable for low light and stargazing conditions, built-in metal tripod adaptation interface (80mm and 100mm) long exit pupil distance design, suitable for observers wearing glasses, refractive adjustment design for accurate focusing (100mm is an independent focusing system).

Amazon's Top Selling Products ranked 94,951 in sports and outdoor recreation products.

It's worth noting that there is no low-light night vision (Amazon says it has) and it's clumsy (kg).

Depending on your needs, the 10*50 binoculars are suitable for hand-holding, and the 15*70 ones are a bit too heavy, like they will shake more violently, and they need to be equipped with a tripod. The best specifications for handheld are generally considered to be 7*50 and 10*50.

The observation effect depends on the specific data, and the light transmission effect of a telescope with a large objective lens may not be good.

The biggest advantage of binoculars is that the field of view is relatively large, if the field of view is too small, it is better to buy a telescope.

If you're here to take pictures, it probably won't work out well for two main reasons:

1. There are many ways to take pictures with a camera and a telescope. And the way you mentioned the single-lens reflex telescope, the effect is not good, I have tested the mirror at the price of 500, and I have also tried the mirror at more than 1000 prices, all of which are the same, this method is not ideal. If you want to shoot well, there is another way, you can see.

2. I don't know how much your telescope is, if it is within 500 prices, I am afraid that the effect of this large-scale zoom will not be particularly good. In the range of low and medium prices, if the multiple range is too large, resulting in an overly complex structure, it is at the expense of effect.

3. For telescopes, don't think too much about "shooting", because after you actually get it, you will find that it is another matter, in the end, there is nothing fun in shooting, or mainly to see.

This one is easy to use.

The effect is okay.

It's also not expensive.

I don't know much about it, I've been in contact with some samples a little before, anyway, I feel that the quality may not be too stable at that time, and I don't recommend it overall.