My neighbour signed with me whether it was legally permissible for me to use the roof alone

First of all, it is necessary to find out who owns the roof, and whether you and your neighbor have the right to agree on such an agreement on the right to use the roof.

Secondly, if the roof is jointly owned by both of you, signing such an agreement means that the right to use the roof has been transferred to you within the time specified in the agreement according to certain conditions of the agreement, but the ownership of that part of the roof is still your neighbor's, if your neighbor is free of charge to you to use in the agreement, then this is a gift, without a notarized gift, the other party can withdraw the right to use at any time.

Finally, the above is only my personal opinion, please consult a lawyer or related professionals for specific situations.

Hello, on this issue, first of all, if there are only two of you in this building, you can have the right to use, but if not, you need to have more than two-thirds of the owners agree and sign to use.

The roof is the common property of the owners of a building, and you are not entitled to use the roof unless you have the consent of all the owners of the building.

I often hear complaints, either because the lawyer's fee is too expensive, or because the lawyer's fee is not transparent, and there is even a fear that the lawyer will not do things after receiving the money. The truth of the matter is that it's not that bad, it's not that rosy.

For the post-70s and post-80s, who have a certain degree of mobility, the case is not complicated, and the subject matter is not large, they can indeed handle it themselves and go to court to defend themselves or their families. But here comes the problem, looking at a simple case, how can it actually be so cumbersome, and you have to run so many places and stamp so many stamps. It's a very simple and clear thing, so why do you need evidence.

And so on and so forth. What is written in Chinese books is always theory, practical operation - in **?? A lot of things can be figured out by reading books and going on the Internet.

Legal consultation seems to be a good choice, but the case is a living today and today's problem, there is a situation tomorrow every day, and the number of paid consultations is also a small amount.

So what to do?

Whole case guidance! It means that you do it yourself, and the lawyer helps you come up with ideas, guides you on how to do it, and tells you why. And according to the specific development of the case, we will formulate a corresponding plan for you.

This can be said to be a solution between paid legal advice and a lawyer. Of course, the cost is relatively low.

This applies to the situation where the parties themselves have a relatively high level of education, have a certain degree of mobility, and the case is not very complicated, and the amount involved is not very high.