Hanging ancient battlefield text, hanging ancient battlefield text

What is the conclusion.

Through the depiction of the war, he drew the conclusion of opposing the war, and then put forward the idea of implementing the royal road, subduing the distant people with benevolence, virtue, courtesy, righteousness, and achieving the unification of the world.

What does that mean?

The center of this article is to advocate the implementation of the royal road, to subdue the distant people with benevolence, virtue, courtesy, righteousness, and to achieve the unification of the world. From the viewpoint of dealing with war, he advocated the rejuvenation of the army of benevolence and righteousness, the existence of conquest without war, and the affirmation of anti-aggression wars and opposition to wars of aggression. The article depicts the war as very cruel and miserable, aiming to arouse the anti-war sentiment of people from all walks of life, in order to "defend the four provinces" and stabilize the border defense, which has a strong purpose.

Hanging Ancient Battlefield Text":

Original: Haohao! The flat sand is boundless, and there is no one in sight.

The river lingers, and the mountains are disputed. Gloomy and miserable, sad and sad. The grass is dry, and the frost is like a morning.

Birds can't fly, and beasts die in groups. Pavilion Beique Chang told Yu: "This ancient battlefield is also!

Frequent trivialization. Often ghosts cry, and when the sky is cloudy, it smells! ”

The translation is as follows: Great, vast! The empty desert is boundless, and the vast desert is uninhabited. The river bends and flows like a streamer.

The mountains are intertwined like dogs' teeth. Dark, miserable and desolate, the wind is sad, and the day is dark. The flies broke off, the grass died, and the morning was as cold as frost, and all kinds of flying bodies had nowhere to live, scurrying in the sky, and many monsters fought fiercely, and ran wildly.

The pavilion chief told me, "This is an ancient battlefield! Often, the whole army of the losing side is not here at night, and the sound of ghosts crying can often be heard in imitation of the morning sound, and every time the sky is cloudy, it will be heard more clearly. ”

The Hanging Ancient Battlefield Essay is a record of the history of warfare during the Tang Dynasty. This document describes in detail the war between the Tang Dynasty and Tibet, especially its performance in the war. This document is of great value for the study of the military history of the Tang Dynasty and the history of Sino-foreign relations.

The Ancient Battlefield Texts mainly tell about the heroic and dust-resistant performance of the Tubo people in the war. The text describes the courage and combat effectiveness of the Tibetans, as well as their tactics and tactics in war. On the other hand, the text also reveals various weaknesses of the Tang army in warfare, such as the confusion of the command system and the instability of the soldiers.

Brother Han. In addition, the Hanging Ancient Battlefield also analyzes the political and economic relations between the Tang Dynasty and Tibet. The article pointed out that the relationship between the Tang Dynasty and Tibet has always been in a state of hostility, but the exchanges between the two countries have never been interrupted. The article also mentions the influence of the Tibetans in the politics of the Changbo Tang Dynasty and the contributions made by the Tibetans in the life and culture of the Tang Dynasty.

In short, "Hanging Ancient Battlefield Text" is a very important historical document, which has irreplaceable value for the study of the history of war and the history of Sino-foreign relations in the Tang Dynasty. Through the description of this document, we can have a deeper understanding of the wars and exchanges between the Tang Dynasty and Tibet, as well as the political and cultural ties between the two countries.

The Hanging Ancient Battlefield Essay uses a satirical tone to ridicule those who only talk about the atrocities of the Yuannai sabotage war and the terrible consequences of its negligence.

The article criticizes politicians for co-opting each other and fighting according to their own political ideas, without being swayed by the great disasters brought about by the wars they generated, so that the people are unfairly harmed.

The article also stresses that politicians are incompatible with each other, hate each other, and ultimately cause the people who benefit the most to suffer the greatest losses.

The article uses vivid metaphors to express the author's indignation at the beginning of the war, and effectively expresses the horror and damage of war.

Even today, we should still remind ourselves not to let our country go to war again because of political backgrounds, cultural differences, and territorial differences.