Why is China s modern science and technology regressing?

Updated on history 2024-05-02
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    First of all, you should say that China's ancient scientific and technological achievements, such as the four major inventions, as well as the achievements in medicine (Sun Simiao, Zhang Zhongjing, Bian Que, etc.), mathematics (nine chapters of arithmetic, Zu Chongzhi, etc.), astronomy (Zhang Hengseng, Guo Shoujing, etc.), etc., are hundreds of years earlier than the West. In the Ming Dynasty, there were Xu Guangqi's complete books of agricultural administration, Song Yingxing's Tiangong Kaiwu, Li Shizhen's Compendium of Materia Medica, and so on. In the Qing Dynasty, Kangxi was the only one who learned Western science and technology, and he just learned it himself and did not advocate it, but continued to use the eight shares to learn from the scholars.

    Chinese are dead in eight strands, and no one cares about technology. At the same time in the West, modern natural science in Europe arose, scientific societies emerged, and theoretical systems of physics and chemistry were established. Our technology is lagging behind the West.

    After the British Industrial Revolution, mankind entered the age of steam, and new inventions emerged one after another, such as trains, steamboats, etc., but China did not, but adopted a closed attitude.

    To illustrate the regression, it is necessary to compare it with the previous leading position and the progress of Western science and technology. There are almost no leading scientific and technological achievements in modern China, which is very different from China's leading science and technology in the world in ancient times.

    You can look at this about the reasons for falling behind.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    China's science and technology has lagged behind the West in recent centuries, mainly for the following reasons:

    1.Deficiencies in the social system. In modern Chinese society, there was an overemphasis on tradition, and the imperial examination and Cheng Zhu's philosophy of science and technology constituted an obstacle to scientific and technological innovation. In contrast, the openness and rationalism of Western society are more conducive to the development of science.

    2.Capitalism is not budding enough. The development of early capitalism in the West gave birth to scientific and technological progress, which was conducive to large-scale scientific and technological investment and industrial revolution. However, China's traditional agricultural society has not seen the germination of capitalism, which is not conducive to the marketization and industrialization of science and technology.

    3.The education system is poor. The rise of early universities in the West, which attached importance to rational thinking and scientific education, trained a large number of scientists. For a long time, Chinese education attaches great importance to traditional learning and despises experimental science, and it is difficult to cultivate talents with modern scientific literacy.

    4.Old-fashioned thinking. Traditional Chinese culture advocates classics and attaches importance to tradition, which is not conducive to rational skepticism and scientific exploration. Western civilization attaches great importance to rationality, empirical evidence, and analysis, which is more conducive to the formation of scientific thinking.

    5.Closed borders. The rise of the West in the early rise of the world, which is conducive to the exchange and dissemination of technology and ideas. However, China has long pursued a relatively closed policy of "feudal dynasty", and it is difficult to absorb advanced Western science and technology and ideas.

    6.Institutional mechanisms are not alive. China's science and technology have long been dependent on the official and imperial power, and the official investment in science and technology is relatively small, and the mechanism is relatively rigid. The West has long had the support of independent scientific institutions and churches, and the system has become more active, which is conducive to the independent development of science and technology.

    To sum up, China's science and technology has been backward compared with the West in modern times, and the deep reason lies in the differences in social systems, economic forms and mindsets, which have led to relatively backward education systems, international exchanges and scientific and technological mechanisms, which are not conducive to the development and progress of science and technology. In order to catch up with and surpass the West, the key lies in carrying out reforms in the social system and way of thinking, and creating an environment that is conducive to the development of science and technology.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Because of the seclusion of the Ming and Qing dynasties.

    Closing the country to the outside world refers to a national policy of closing oneself and not having contact with the outside world, which is a typical isolationism. Strictly restrict exchanges with foreign countries in the fields of economy, culture, and science. It is determined that it was implemented in the early Qing Dynasty of China"Retreat"or"Closed off the country"The policy view stemmed from the British merchants who Pira was trying to sell his goods, especially opium, to China at the time.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    In modern times, China is closed to the rest of the country, and the Chinese cannot access new knowledge and technology, so the backwardness of science and technology has resulted.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Why did China lag behind the West in modern times? Liang Qichao said 3 reasons and directly pointed out the key points.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    I think the main reason is that China's scientific tradition, or this scientific culture is not too important, so that ancient science actually has no basis for development, and practical science can also be based on its own use attributes, but some theoretical research can not see what kind of practical effect, then it is even more impossible to be supported, so the foundation of modern science and technology did not exist in ancient China.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    China's modern technology is already relatively advanced, and it is not lagging behind, but in the past, China was a little behind in technology because of its isolation from the rest of the country.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The reason for the backwardness of modern times may be because of some of this, the backwardness of the system, or the backwardness of the economy and culture.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    It has a lot to do with the policy of closing the country to the outside world, which has led to backwardness in all aspects.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    This is backwardness in terms of system, or backwardness in terms of economy and culture. It could also be that they are lagging behind in other areas.

Related questions
7 answers2024-05-02

In fact, this is related to the social system, the ** centralized system pursued in ancient China is very different from the West, the Renaissance movement in the 14th century lifted the veil of theological ideas in Europe, and at this time China is still the divine right of the monarchy, labor, productivity are very concentrated, so sometimes you can raise the power of the whole country to carry out a revolution or build a project, compared to China's monarchy, the citizens of Western Europe are much more free and scattered than ancient China, whether it is in thought or behavior, However, China's system is not suitable for modern scientific and technological innovation, ancient China's brilliant achievements are obvious to all, because it is an agricultural system, so it can feed so many people in that era of underdeveloped labor, but it does not adapt to the modern environment, and the West is a commercial system, so there are few achievements in ancient times, and in modern times that need scientific and technological innovation, because those businessmen need to profit from scientific and technological innovation, so they will invest capital to support scientists, inventors, and in power, In China, where resources are highly concentrated, such a model will not and cannot exist. Therefore, under the guidance and drive of a group of merchants who seek profit and avoid harm, the carriages of the era were replaced by trains, ships, and, for them, perhaps ironclads and mortars. >>>More

11 answers2024-05-02

The landlord class and the feudal forces could not save China, and the road of bourgeoisie would not work in China. Only communism can save China. >>>More

8 answers2024-05-02

1.The scale and impact of the struggle were relatively large. >>>More

32 answers2024-05-02

This is the result of a combination of internal and external factors. >>>More

6 answers2024-05-02

Chongqing negotiations, Chiang Kai-shek and *** signed the Double Tenth Agreement (October 10), but this agreement was only to deceive the people and prepare conditions for civil war. >>>More