Is Montgomal British, about Montgomer

Updated on history 2024-05-08
16 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Montgomery was British. Bernard Law Montgomery (17 November 1887 – 24 March 1976) was a British Field Marshal. One of the outstanding commanders of the Allied forces in World War II, in 1943, he participated in the capture of Sicily and the landing in Italy, led the Allied forces into France in 1944, and led the Allied forces to attack Normandy on June 6, and won the Normandy landing operation.

    He was later promoted to Field Marshal, was made a viscount, and served as Chief of the Imperial General Staff from 1946 to 1948. Montgomery met *** several times during his lifetime, leaving behind many little-known pasts. Montgomery was always a cautious, thorough strategist.

    He insisted on being fully prepared in terms of manpower and material resources before each sortie, and although it slowed down the course of the war, it was safe and reliable, and ensured his prestige among his subordinates.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Bernard Law Montgomery: A brilliant British military strategist, British field marshal, strategist, and one of the outstanding Allied commanders in World War II. The famous Battle of El Alamein and the Normandy landings were the two masterpieces of his military career.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Of course Bernard Law Montgomery: a brilliant British military strategist, British Field Marshal, strategist.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    His name is Montgomery, British.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Montgomery was certainly British.

    Serious is a general who defeated Rommel in North Africa during World War II.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    He was a famous British general at the time of World War II.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Montgozi Mali was always a cautious and thorough strategist. He insisted on making full preparations in terms of manpower and material resources before each attack, and although the war was concerned, although it slowed down the process, it was safe and reliable, Montgomery was strict in governing the army, and paid attention to training troops from actual combat; Emphasis was placed on boosting the morale of the troops, and it was believed that giving full play to people's enthusiasm was an important factor in achieving victory; It is advisable to make good preparations for the pre-war salute, formulate a thorough battle plan, and minimize the number of personnel. Montgomery is the author of "Memoirs of Marshal Montgomery", "The Road to Leadership", "History of the War", "From El Alamein to the Sangro River", "From Normandy to the Baltic", etc.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Barton: He's more concerned about not losing the battle than how to win. Eisenhower:

    In war, the criterion for evaluating a commander is his total record of victories and defeats. Montgomer was accused of being overwhelmed, saying that he had sometimes failed to achieve maximum results, but they had to admit that he had never suffered a single defeat.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Montgomery is a very cautious person, a cautious general is not easy to fight a beautiful battle, because his routine is very conservative, but this kind of general is more suitable for a strong military camp, such as the United Kingdom, where he is located, because the simpler the way of fighting, the less weaknesses the enemy can grasp, use absolute national strength to crush you, Britain has also used this trick to win countless battles before, and ensure that the army can minimize losses when the army is defeated, which is extremely important in the early days of World War II The British army in deep trouble, Moreover, a conservative officer like Montgomery trained his subordinates extremely strictly, and the British troops he led were extremely effective in the Central Powers. And Germany in the launch of World War II when the national strength is significantly weaker than Britain and France, so most of the German generals belong to the reformists, using the limited forces in their hands to defeat the almost infinite enemy, if the frontal hard fight will definitely be over, but at the same time the radical tactics face a huge risk, the weakness of the blitzkrieg is that if you fail to defeat the opponent at one time, then the distant supply will limit the second offensive ability, and the mechanized troops deep in the enemy army will face the risk of being surrounded. Montgomery's exploits may not have been outstanding, but his command was in line with the conditions of the Allies at the time, and El Alamein and Normandy were distinctly Montgomerian battles, which, although slow down the course of the war, were safe and reliable, and ensured his prestige among his subordinates.

    Sitting and watching the entire European battlefield, Montgomery and Zhukov's routines are extremely similar, but Zhukov can exchange more than twice the enemy's ** for victory, which is absolutely unworkable in Britain with a limited population, Montgomery is just using a war method suitable for Britain to command the war.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Bernard Law Montgomery (November 17, 1887 – March 25, 1976) was a British field marshal and military strategist, who was one of the most prominent Allied generals during World War II. In 1943, he commanded the Allied troops to land in Sicily, and the Italian army was forced to land; In 1944, he commanded the Allied forces to regain France, which won a decisive victory in the Normandy landings. After the war, he was promoted to the rank of British Field Marshal and was made a viscount; From 1946 to 1948, he served as Chief of the General Staff of the Reich.

    Montgomery met *** several times during his lifetime, leaving behind many little-known pasts. Throughout his life, Montgomery was a discreet and thorough military strategist. He insisted on making adequate preparations in terms of manpower and material resources before each sortie, and although it slowed down the course of the war, it was safe and reliable, and guaranteed his prestige in the eyes of his subordinates.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Alexander was a viscount, and Montgomery was a baron.

    Western viscounts are formal nobles, and barons are often only temporary nobles, and cannot be hereditary, and even the countries that can be hereditary are quietly descended to viscounts.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Bernard Law Montgomery ( . . )British Field Marshal, military strategist, one of the outstanding Allied commanders of World War II. The famous Battle of El Alamein and the "Market Garden" project were two of the masterpieces of his military career.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Rommel, of course. Subjectively speaking, Montgomery had already figured out Rommel's way of fighting from Rommel's previous battles. Rommel, on the other hand, knew almost nothing about Montgomery. This is what Sun Tzu said in the Art of War: "Only by knowing oneself and knowing one's opponent can one not be defeated in a hundred battles." ”

    This is the biggest difference between the two. Montgomery, on the other hand, had little motive in his defeat of Rommel to maximize the results of the battle, and only thought of using positional warfare (i.e., a strong material base to consume others), rather than actively and subjectively striving to achieve greater results. And Rommel, in an unfavorable situation, was able to actively attack the Americans and achieve a brilliant victory.

    Another fatal wound of Rommel was his neglect of logistics.

    Objectively speaking, Rommel's army was a small force, while Montgomery had a large reserve base. On the other hand, Rommel is under pressure from two political sides, and he has to deal with the relationship between these two political aspects, and in this case, Rommel faces many problems. Montgomery didn't have to deal with that because someone in his last summit was dealing with that kind of political relationship.

    Rommel's operational aspect was only a minor aspect to Hitler. And for the UK, the UK sees this as important. And the army commanded by Montgomery was still a fist force.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    It's all right, Rommel failed because he used the same tactics, and Montgomery took advantage of his weakness to win.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Rommel, the desert fox is not covered!

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Encyclopedia is there!

    Bernard Hail Lou Montgomery: Bernard's outstanding British military strategist, British Field Marshal, strategist, and one of the outstanding Allied commanders in World War II. The famous Battle of El Alamein and the Normandy landings are two masterpieces of its military career.

Related questions
5 answers2024-05-08

No, Lu Yao knows the horsepower, and sees the hearts of the people over time, the real meaning of this sentence is different from what we usually know. "Lu Yao knows the horsepower, and sees the hearts of the people for a long time", this well-documented sentence comes from "Yuanqu Fighting for Kindness". "The road knows the horsepower, and the people can see the hearts of the people over time", it is generally believed that it means that the strength of the horse can only be known when the road is far away, and the quality of the people's hearts can be seen only after the days are long. >>>More

8 answers2024-05-08

The United States and Britain have always been very good allies, but in reality, the best military alliance of the United States is not the United Kingdom, but the military alliance between Israel and the United States has a better relationship. The reason for this is actually very simple. First of all, in terms of combat effectiveness, the Israelis have always been very strong in combat, and they are constantly beating the surrounding Arab countries. >>>More

4 answers2024-05-08

The Renaissance was a profound cultural and ideological change that took place in many European countries from the 14th to the 16th centuries, and it was a bourgeois anti-feudal and anti-church ideological and cultural movement formed under the historical conditions of the disintegration of European feudal society and the budding of capitalism, which announced the end of the Middle Ages and the birth of modern society. >>>More

14 answers2024-05-08

Yes, but not entirely.

Only 13 states east of the Appalachian Mountains in the United States were once British colonies. >>>More

11 answers2024-05-08

100% imported from Malaysia. With a long history of more than 200 years, Charlen has always been praised for his sound quality, and is the official instrument of the BBC along with Steinway Bessendorf. >>>More