I need a few examples to prove that the winner is king, and the loser is the loser

Illustration 1: On December 25, 1948, a Xinhua reporter was asked about first-class war criminals and a preliminary list of 43 people was provided. The 43 first-class war criminals are:

Chiang Kai-shek, Li Zongren, Chen Cheng, Bai Chongxi, He Yingqin, Gu Zhutong, Chen Guofu, Chen Lifu, Kong Xiangxi, Song Ziwen, Zhang Qun, Weng Wenhao, Sun Ke, Wu Tiecheng, Wang Yun.

5. Dai Chuanxian, Wu Dingchang, Xiong Shihui, Zhang Lisheng, Zhu Jiahua, Wang Shijie, Gu Weijun, Song Meiling, Wu Guozhen, Liu Zhi, Cheng Qian, Li Yue, Wei Lihuang, Yu Hanmou, Hu Zongnan, Fu Zuoyi, Yan Xishan, Zhou Zhirou, Wang Shuming, Gui Yongqing, Du Yuming, Tang Enbo, Sun Liren, Ma Hongda, Ma Bufang, Tao Xisheng, Zeng Qi, Zhang Junmao.

Among them, Li Zongren, the No. 2 war criminal, commanded the Battle of Xuhai from February to May 1938. Among them, the Battle of Taierzhuang from March to April achieved a major victory in annihilating more than 20,000 Japanese troops, which was the biggest victory on the frontal battlefield of resistance against Japan. During his tenure as a member of the Chinese delegation to the Paris Peace Conference, Gu Weijun, the No. 22 war criminal, spoke outright on behalf of China in order to strive for the settlement of the Shandong issue, and won extremely high prestige.

He has served as China's representative to the Washington Conference, ambassador to France, the United Kingdom, the United States and other countries, participated in the drafting of the UN Charter, and signed the UN Charter on behalf of China.

Cheng Qian, the No. 26 war criminal, was the director of the Wuhan Xingyuan, the director of the Kuomintang Changsha Pacification Office, and the chairman of Hunan Province. In August 1949, an uprising was declared in Changsha, and the whole province of Hunan was peacefully liberated. After liberation, he successively served as a member of the People's Committee, vice chairman of the National People's Congress, vice chairman of the National Defense Commission, governor of Hunan Province, and vice chairman of the Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang.

War Criminals No. 31 During the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, Fu Zuoyi commanded the Third Battle of Huairou, the Battle of Suiyuan, and the Battle of Recovering the Five Plains, all of which achieved great victories. Fu Zuoyi thus became a national hero and was known as the "victorious general". In January 1949, Fu Zuoyi led his troops to revolt, and Beiping was peacefully liberated.

After the founding of the People's Republic of China, he served as Minister of Water Resources.

No. 13 war criminal: Sun Ke, son of Sun Yat-sen. He has served as the president of the Legislative Yuan, including examination, administration, and legislative yuan. In 1949, he went to the United States and made a living growing vegetables. On September 20, 1973, Sun Ke died in Taipei.

These people are either admired for their achievements in recent history, or they have been removed from war criminals or even held high positions because of their later adherence to the Communist Party. It even includes the only son of the founding father, Mr. Sun Yat-sen. Are they war criminals or not? What crime was committed?

Of course, this is not to say that the Communist Party of China is wrong, but that "winning the king and defeating the king" has always been true.

As for Qin Hui, did he win? No. Yue Fei had never fought with him at all, he was just an executioner of Zhao Gou, who used Yin ** to defeat Yue Fei, and there was no victory at all.

Liu Bang started as a gangster and sat on the throne of the emperor, and history respected him as the ancestor of the Han Dynasty.

Xiang Yu and Chu Han failed in the dispute, and history positioned him as a loser.

Wang Mang established a new dynasty and was destroyed by the Eastern Han Dynasty, and he was positioned as Kou in history.

Genghis Khan established the Yuan Dynasty and positioned him as king in history.

Although the world praised Yue Fei, Yue Fei was killed, and Qin Hui was alive.

Liu Bang, Xiang Yu, Chu and Han disputes.

Li Shimin's Xuanwumen Change.

Zhu Di opposed Emperor Jianwen.

The winner is king, and the loser is the loser. Do you agree with this statement?

I can't fully agree with the so-called "the winner is king, and the loser is the villain." "It's just wishful thinking on the part of the world.

This sentence is compared to the literal meaning, the victorious person has the rights and glory of the king, and the defeated person is insulted, ruined and even called a thief.

The reason for this judgment is that we all yearn for the power, interests and status of the victor. Therefore, we only see in our eyes the power and interests of the victor.

But what is the winner? When will the winner?

Have you ever thought carefully that people in the world are just a drop in the ocean, and a momentary victory is just a splash in the long river of history. The victor's victory was only a flash in the pan.

So what about the winner's victory, is it a constant victory or a temporary victory?

What is behind the power of the king? Is it a natural disaster or a man-made disaster?

Zhao Gao, the great eunuch of the Qin Dynasty, can be described as the biggest winner of eunuchs in history, and can also be described as a model of the winner being the king. He can be powerful, do whatever he wants, and take the reversal of black and white to the extreme, pointing to the deer as a horse is his masterpiece.

However, he didn't expect that he was finally killed by the son of the representative of his own power, and even if he died, he would be punished by the three clans, what kind of winner was this? What a disaster?

When it comes to Zhao Gao, it is impossible not to mention his good partner - Qin II Hu Hai. Hu Hai is also the representative of the winner as the king, once in power, he acted recklessly, indiscriminately killed innocents, and killed more than 30 of his brothers and sisters.

However, he never imagined that he would die in the hands of his good partner Zhao Gao. This king, who single-handedly manipulated him to become a king, ended him with his own eyes.

Hu Hai, who reigned for just three years, was the king for three years, leaving behind a lifetime of infamy and notoriety.

The so-called winner is the king, and if virtue is not matched, there will be disaster seedlings.

The winner is king, and in addition to the influence of the power we see, there is also virtue and fame that we do not see.

On the contrary, it is the same for the loser to be a coward, and a momentary failure is just a matter of being slaughtered by others and suffering and humiliation for a while. As long as the determination is unswerving and the virtue is not compromised, the loser will not always be the loser. Goujian, the king of Yue, successfully turned defeat into victory by lying on the salary and tasting courage, leaving a good name for a lifetime.

Therefore, "the winner is king, and the loser is the villain." "It's just a judgment in front of you, and it can't stand the test of time after all.

In the end, who is the king and who is the coward, the basis for judging is not only the temporary result, but also the individual's virtue and character.

There is copy

Li Dao said: "Led by 100,000 male soldiers, they will go west day and night, this time the winner is the king, and the loser is the coward." seized Chang'an to avenge Dong Gong".

Not long after, he encountered Lu Bu's soldiers and horses on the way, and Li Dao was defeated and retreated more than 50 miles. So Guo Yan, Fan Chou, and Zhang Ji were invited to discuss. Li Dao said to everyone:

Lu Bu has courage and no strategy, so there is no need to worry at all. I led an army to defend the valley and lured him to fight every day; General Guo can lead the army to copy and copy it, follow the method of Peng Yue and scratch Chu, Ming Jin will advance, and the drum will retreat; General Fan and General Zhang divided their troops into two routes and went straight to Chang'an. If it is not the end, it will inevitably fail.

The crowd used their tricks.

The winner is king, and the loser is the villain.

To put it simply: if this person succeeds in doing something, then he is a hero, and if he does not succeed, he is a waste. Derogatory elements are predominant.

Nowadays, it is often used to describe a society in which forces look at people. Story Born in troubled times, rising up, life and death fighting, who is the king? Banquets and fights, scoundrels and vulgar fights, soldiers meet each other, who is the coward?

One is a famous family who can carry the crown, is talented, and is brave and good at fighting; One is a country official who is not producing, does not learn and has no skills, and is greedy for wine. If we were to bet, we would think that the former would be king. However, who would have thought that it was the former who would end up betraying their relatives and leaving their relatives, and it was the latter who would eventually become the founding king?

Xiang Yu and Liu Bang, these two dramatic characters, are worthy of our careful analysis.

I thought Xiang Yu was an outstanding military strategist. He was brave and good at fighting, taking the lead, invincible, and making many military exploits. In addition, the straightforward and bold Xiang Yu respects and respects his subordinates, and he can even treat sores for soldiers.

In this way, why did excellent military strategists fall to such a state? I think there are two reasons for this: First, Xiang Yu is stubborn and self-serving.

You must know that war is a contest of collective strength, and it requires courage and wisdom. At the moment of death, he did not forget to boast to his subordinates about the brave Xiang Yu, because he did not accept Fan Zeng's words, let the tiger return to the mountain, and finally became embattled; It is precisely because of his stubbornness and self-use that he does not ally with Han Xin, and as a result, he suffers from the enemy in his abdomen and back, resulting in a hero's tragedy. In addition, Xiang Yu did not have extraordinary political acumen.

It is easy to call the king, and it is difficult to defend the country.

As the saying goes: those who win the hearts of the people win the world. And Xiang Yu killed his son and burned the Qin Palace, destroyed the agreement, and killed the righteous emperor to break the contract.

In this way, can it win the hearts and minds of the people? Let's take a look at Liu Bang, who became the monarch of a country from the frog at the bottom of the well, he is good at employing people. When he summarized the reasons for Xiang Yu's failure, he said, in the midst of strategizing, the decisive victory is thousands of miles away, I am not as good as Zhang Liang; Transporting grain and grass, ensuring supply, governing the country and securing the people, I am not as good as Xiao He; Coming to the front line in person and waving troops to kill the enemy, I am not as good as Han Xin.

The three of them are rare heroes in the world, although I can't compare to them in some aspects, but I can reuse them and give full play to their talents, so I defeated Xiang Yu to get the world. In this way, can people who reuse capable people not succeed? In addition, Liu Bang also adopted a civilian policy, widely granted welfare, and won the hearts of the people.

Therefore, from the perspective of employing people and governing the country, Xiang Yu is far inferior to Liu Bang. But from the perspective of affection, Xiang Yu is stronger than Liu Bang. Just looking at the unswerving loyalty of Xiang Yu and Yu Ji, and the love of life and death, you can feel that Xiang Yu is a good man.

Moreover, from the fact that Xiang Yu would rather kill himself in Wujiang than steal his life alone, it can be seen that he is a righteous man. And what about Liu Bang? Although he and his ugly wife are in harmony with each other, I think that with his greedy nature, it is impossible for him to love only one woman, so it is impossible for him to live and die with his lover.

From this, I appreciate Xiang Yu's character even more.

But the winner is king, and the loser is the villain. Xiang Yu's helplessness, Xiang Yu's failure, and Xiang Yu's death have left the endless imagination of future generations.

It is a common saying that has been handed down in ancient China to this day. The old refers to the fact that in the struggle for Sun Qing's regime, the victorious one is legitimate, and the emperor is called the king; Those who fail are illegal, and they are called thieves. It contains the power of the victor in his hands, and no one dares to blame, but the loser has the meaning of hard to argue.

To put it simply: if this person succeeds in doing things, then he is a hero, and if he does not succeed, he is a waste.

Derogatory elements are predominant. then collapse.

Nowadays, it is often used to describe a society in which forces look at people.