Will the Crimean issue become the fuse of the third world station?

Updated on military 2024-05-03
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Putin's dispatch of troops to the Crimean Peninsula this time will not trigger a world war like Hitler did.

    The reasons are as follows: First, the situation is completely different. Before the World War, Germany had a feud with France and the shame of defeat in World War II, and at that time, Germany had a strong industrial and national strength, and had the ability and motivation to launch aggression.

    At the same time, Hitler had already carried out large-scale planning and planning, and it can be said that after a long period of operation and deployment of troops, he had long had the ambition of encroaching on many small countries and then annexing Europe to dominate the world. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia's vitality has been greatly damaged, and it is in the process of recovering its vitality in the wrestling with the United States and Europe.

    Second, Putin is not Hitler. After all, Putin is a generation that grew up in the socialist ideological environment and under the enlightenment of Lenin's thought, and he has neither the pathological desire for self-development like Hitler's crazy "Mein Kampf"-style, nor the revenge of the vengeance that is eager to wait for the shameful feud (Germany and Japan have long been subdued, and the United States is too far apart), at best, the Putin Emperor has a little innate instinctive worship of their proud ancestor Peter the Great, and just wants to keep vested interests, And then it is just a matter of appropriately expanding the living space of the Russian nation.

    These two points show that Putin will not and does not want to fight a world war now, and the third world war will not happen now.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Rest assured, if the situation really escalates to that point, Bumpman will come forward to help the United States and Russia mediate. At least now, whether it is Ohei or Putin, they have to give face to Bumpman, there is no doubt about it! ~o(∩_o~

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    It seems that you are on the side of the United States, but in fact, many people are on the side of the United States now. If Russia loses, China will be next. Support Russia.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    …Big brother, how can this ,,, earthling's internal affairs allow aliens to interfere in their internal affairs? After all, aliens are not American.........

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The probability is zero.

    Peace and development are the major trends and themes.

    Crimea is a core interest of Russia, but not of the United States. The Americans are just fooling and condemning.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    It can't be, a world war needs to have a sufficiently large contradiction of interests to be possible. Now there is not such a big conflict of interest between the East and the West at all. Moreover, in the modern society of economic globalization, the confrontation between any major powers will cause the global economy to decline or even collapse, and no country will sacrifice its huge vested interests to seek a temporary victory.

    In addition, Blackwater is just a relatively high-level and large-scale mercenary company, and if you have a milk, you are a mother, and whoever gives money to help someone fight a war is not a political conspiracy. The U.S. deployment is just a declaration of attitude. The top two military forces in the world are engaged in battles, and everyone has to weigh them carefully.

    It is impossible for the United States to risk a nuclear war and fight Maozi. He couldn't afford the risk.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Just look at the attitude of Europe and the United States. There will be no large-scale conflict. Not to mention sparking a big war.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    No, modern countries of this level are trying to avoid strong confrontation, which will cause their own side to be larger** Now it is generally the big powers in the case of absolute superiority, in the case of ensuring their own low ** to carry out local bombing or ground raids, has achieved their political goals, I think China and Japan are now so restrained, may also be in this regard, and now they have fought with nuclear weapons, and the dog is in a hurry to jump over the wall, once which side feels that it cannot achieve its goal with conventional **, and even cannot protect itself, it is inevitable that nuclear weapons will not be used The two sides that this creates are unimaginable, so I feel that the big powers will be more restrained in this regard.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    No, if China is the main battlefield, it means that when China is invaded and defeated, powerful countries will not make their own country the main battlefield.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    It won't be because when the big war is fought, it is also the latest ** battlefield Foreign invasion Our country will definitely fight back You fight me, I will bombard you with two artillery Neither please Who is the main battlefield who knows.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    When pigs fly! Our country is not stupid at all, and a world war cannot be fought with a casual word.

Related questions
7 answers2024-05-03

This problem is not easy to define, before the First World War, there are thousands of years of war history, such as the Mongolian Western Expedition may not be smaller than the scope of the First World War, the affected ethnic groups and numbers are smaller, and the war ** may not be less than the Second World War, if you want to refer to the modern hot weapon war, then Crimea may not be the largest, because the 7 anti-French coalition wars are also bigger than the other, if you see 7 as a war against the expansion of France, it is much more than the Crimean War... Including the scale of the American Civil War.

6 answers2024-05-03

For one-piece dresses, it's better to get a long bandeau skirt with a cut-out blouse (white) and wear a pair of flat sandals, which are rattan-like rattan sandals (so that you don't look tall). >>>More

4 answers2024-05-03

Honey, I'm going to do it before Tuesday, and I can't wait for you like this

3 answers2024-05-03

Bohemia: This originally refers to a place in the western part of the Czech Republic bordering a neighbouring country. Today's so-called "bohemian style" is the kind of clothing style that retains a certain nomadic characteristics, which is characterized by bright handmade decorations and rough and heavy fabrics, especially accessories, multi-layered beads, tassel necklaces, etc., permeated with women's wildness and romance. >>>More

2 answers2024-05-03

Amicius is Italian.

Studying in Turin as a teenager, Amicius began his military career at the age of fifteen when he joined the Military Academy of Modena. Amicius' representative work is a diary ** "The Education of Love", which is rich in emotion and beautifully written. >>>More