I want to see those two countries fight each other, and there is a game where two countries are at w

Argentina and Brazil, of course.

Argentina and Brazil.

But some say it may not be Brazil anymore. Changed to Germany.

This, ancient China was basically a civil war... The Huns and the Turks have all gone to Europe. The Sui Dynasty fought with Korea, the Tang Dynasty fought with Arabia, and also fought with India, and the Ming Dynasty basically fought with Little Japan...

In ancient times, Vietnam was known as Jiaozhi and Jiaozhou. After the fall of the Tang Dynasty, the local tyrants of Jiaozhi cut off the land one after another, and then formed twelve major forces, known as the twelve envoys. One of the twelve envoys, Chen Minggong, was the most powerful, he had a general named Ding Buling, and his descendants led his subordinates to level the twelve envoys, and established the "Great Qu Yue Kingdom" (also known as the Ding Dynasty) in 968 AD.

Since then, Vietnam has officially become independent. And there have been wars with China in all dynasties, plus the two wars against Vietnam in the 20th century, a total of 7.

The first place in this ranking is Japan (the most frequent wars were in the Ming Dynasty), followed by South Korea and North Korea (originally a country), Mongolia is also counted as one (at that time Inner and Outer Mongolia was counted as one), and the last in the ranking are India and Arabia.

The United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia, Spain, Portugal, Australia, South Korea, Vietnam, India, and Japan, the more they think about it, the more they think about it, as if China has been at war with all the big countries, most of them have been beaten by people, and they have been beaten in a hurry.

Japan, the United States, India, Vietnam, the Soviet Union, South Korea, Britain, France, and the Eight-Nation Alliance.

The two countries exchanged troops, and they did not cut them off.

The two countries are in the army, not 斩来使 (liǎng guó jiāo bīng, bù zhǎn lái shǐ).

Explanation: Refers to the envoy who cannot kill the dual subordinate parties in the special battle.

Source: Qing Li Baojia's "The Appearance of Officialdom" Chapter 55: "The two countries exchange troops, and if we don't kill them, it doesn't matter if we send someone there." ”

RTS-like real-time strategy ......What Warcraft, StarCraft, Red Alert.

Chess, military chess, empire, red police, Warcraft, etc.

Warriors of the Three Kingdoms, how's that? I think it's okay.

It depends on the strength of the third party.

On some cutting-edge issues between the two countries, the past has sabotaged or over-publicized the contradictions between the two countries. This is how the United States further expanded the Russian-Georgian war in the past.

It's very easy, assassinate the prime minister of your country, and then fight another country, it's not hostile!