Help me think about it, thank you

Updated on collection 2024-05-13
12 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Your explanation of this question is misleading! People with unclear heads are easy to be fooled into by you! It's important for you to get your money back now! But you're ignoring the 25 pieces spent! I'll just change it for you!

    At the beginning, I paid 10 yuan per person, and now I have 1 yuan back, that is, 10-1 = 9, and only 9 yuan per person, 9 yuan per person for 3 people, 3 x 9 = 27 yuan.

    It costs 25 yuan to open a room!

    This is the 2 yuan that was hidden by the waiter!

    There is no missing piece!!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    According to this line of thought, why not add the 1 yuan returned in each person's hand.

    That is, 3 * 9 + 3 * 1 + 2 = 32, doesn't it create a value of 2 yuan? Ha ha.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Hehe! 3 * 9 = 27 paid to the boss, the waiter took 2 of the 27 yuan, the boss that 25 yuan, to add is to add 3 yuan to return. Can this also be stumped?

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    One of them returned one dollar, that is, each person took out 9 yuan, 3*9=27, no problem, but the boss got 25, and the three of them paid a total of 27, and the waiter stole two dollars, so the two dollars should be subtracted, exactly 25, the same amount of money as the boss got, no problem.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Hello, after the accommodation discount, it is 25 yuan.

    The waiter hid 2 yuan.

    That's actually spending 25+2=27

    Plus the return of 3 yuan is exactly 30 yuan.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    3 x 9 = $27 + $2 hidden by the waiter = $29, which is an illusion.

    It should be 3 x 9 = 27 yuan - 2 yuan hidden by the waiter = 25 yuan, 27 yuan is paid by the host, and 25 yuan is the boss's income. The other $3 was returned to his possession.

    That's it.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    In fact, there is no such thing, and it is not right to follow that algorithm! But I don't know exactly how it counts. I'm sorry!

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    3 x 9 = $27 + $2 from the waiter = $29.

    This part of the logic is wrong.

    Total amount = Actual amount paid by the Guest (3 x 9) + Refund received by the Guest (3 x 1) or The total amount = the accommodation fee charged by the boss (30-5) + the money returned by the boss (2 secretly left by the waiter + 3*1 by the guest).

    Or. The actual amount of money paid by the guest (3*9) = the accommodation fee charged by the boss (30-5) + the fee reserved by the waiter (2).

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    This is a logical error, the boss took 25 yuan, the waiter stole 2 yuan, returned 3 yuan to the customer, the customer was equivalent to 9 yuan, and 3927 yuan was equivalent to paying the waiter and the boss.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The result is an equation: the square of x plus 64x+448=0 This equation seems to be unsolvable

    That is, there was no such year!

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    d is correct.

    a, the mass of sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide is equal, the mass of the cation is different.

    b、c。The mass of sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide is equal, and the mass of the anion is also different. The number also varies.

    d。That's right. Mass fraction = solute mass of the solution. And the solute and solvent quality are equal.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Do you need to do 30km Set the distance to be x A and B The speed of two people is y. The formula is: 5y=x; 3(y+4)=x solves y=6;x=30

Related questions
2 answers2024-05-13

Abstract incoming scalable amendments in.

A domain name is built into the scalability of the space. A new double. >>>More

8 answers2024-05-13

1) Meaning: All emergencies can be seen (**).

2) Fire prevention. 3) Customs form. >>>More

9 answers2024-05-13

1, used to say used in the past, but did not do it now. It means "I used to be a superwoman". would, which means past and future, is not quite appropriate here. >>>More

8 answers2024-05-13

The CPU and motherboard are not compatible, the interface is different The CPU is AM3, the motherboard is the FM1 interface, and the hard disk is the green disk of WD, the performance is low, no matter how big the cache is, it is useless, and the speed is too low. >>>More

15 answers2024-05-13

Constellations. Girls just like to play.

Hehehe. >>>More