Solve fractional equation 3 2X 5 2X 5 4 2X 1 2X 1 7 2X 5 2X 1 15

Updated on science 2024-05-13
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Solution: (Step 1 to Step 2: Convert the fractional equation into a formal equation; Steps 3 to 6 are simplification).

    Original)3 (2x+5)(2x+5)+4 (2x+1)(2x+1)=7 (2x+5)(2x+1).

    Step 1) 3 (2x+1) (2x+1) (2x+5) (2x+5) (2x+1) (2x+1) +4 (2x+5) (2x+5) (2x+5) (2x+1) (2x+1) = 7 (2x+5) (2x+1) (2x+5) (2x+5) (2x+1) (2x+1).

    Step 2) 3 (2x+1) (2x+1) + 4 (2x+5) (2x+5) = 7 (2x+5) (2x+1).

    Step 3) 12x 2 + 12x + 3 + 16x 2 + 80x + 100 = 28x 2 + 84x + 35

    Step 4) 28x 2 + 92x + 103 = 28x 2 + 84x + 35

    Step 5) 8x=-68

    Step 6) x=17 2 or x=

    The fifth step of the calculation has a slight feeling of skipping some steps, and you can write it step by step).

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    When you encounter a lot of denominators, you should first consider eliminating the denominator, multiply both sides of the equation by (2x+5) (2x+5)*(2x+1) (2x+1), and then the denominator is gone, and then it is a simple operation, you can, come on.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    3 (2x+5) +4 (2x+1) =7 (2x+5) (2x+1) Let (2x+5) be a and 2x+1) be b

    Then the original formula is: 3 a + 4 b = 7 ab

    Multiply a b on both sides at the same time

    3b²+4a²=7ab

    3b²+4a²-7ab=0

    4a-3b)(a-b)=0

    Bring A and B in.

    4(2x+5)-3(2x+1)】【2x+5)-(2x+1)】=04(2x+17)=0

    x=17/2

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    x/(2x-3)+5/(3-2x)=4

    x-5)/(2x-3) =4

    x-5 = 8x -12

    7x = 7

    x=1 If you don't understand anything, you can continue to ask this question.

    Please select the satisfactory answer in time

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    :(1)7/(x-2)=5/x

    7x=5x-10

    2x=-10

    x=-52)x/(x-1)+(5x-2)/(x²-x)=1;

    x²+5x-2=x²-x

    5x+x=2

    6x=2x=-1/3

    3)2/(x+3)+3/2=7/(2x+6);

    4+3x+9=7

    3x=7-13

    3x=-6x=-2

    4)1/(x²+5x+6)=1/(x+2)+1/(x+3).

    1/(x+2)(x+3)=1/(x+2)+1/(x+3)1=x+3+x+2

    2x=5-1

    2x=4x=-2

    The original equation x=-2 is meaningless.

    There is no solution to the original equation.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    (1)5x-10=7x

    2x=-10

    x=-5 is tested, and x=-5 is the solution of the original equation.

    2)x^2+5x-2=x^2-x

    6x=2x=1/3

    After testing, x=1 3 is the solution of the original equation.

    3)4+3x+9=7

    3x=-6x=-2

    After testing, x=-2 is the solution of the original equation.

    4)1=x+3+x+2

    2x=-4x=-2

    After testing, x=-2 is not the solution of the original equation.

    There is no solution to the original equation.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    (1)7x=5(x-2) ;7x-5x=10 ; x=-5(2)x²+5x-2=x²-x; x=1/3(3)3/(x+3)=3; x=-2

    4)1=x+2+x+3;The x=-2 equation is meaningless, so there is no solution.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Merge similar items: 32x -4x =0, that is, x (8x-1)=0

    Solution: x1=0 , x2=1 8

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Both sides are formatted together.

    x-3)(x-2)-(x-4)(x-1))/((x-1)(x-2))=((x-5)(x-4)-(x-6)(x-3))/((x-3)(x-4))

    Solve the molecule and you have it.

    2 ((x-1)(x-2))=2 ((x-3)(x-4)) solves: x=5 2

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Multiplying (x-1) (x-2) (x-3) (x-4) on both sides at the same time will be a bit redundant and require patience in the solution.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    x/(2x-3)+5/(3-2x)=4

    x-5)/(2x-3) =4

    x-5 = 8x -12

    7x = 7

    x=1 Autumn Wind Yanyan answers the question for you o( o

    If you don't understand anything, you can continue to ask this question.

    If you are satisfied, please select the satisfactory answer in time, thank you.

Related questions
15 answers2024-05-13

The specific solution is as follows:

42+25)x=134 >>>More

7 answers2024-05-13

Draw |x+3|is 1 |2x-1|For 2, both are V-shaped, the first lowest point is x=-3, and the second x=1 is taken when 2. >>>More

14 answers2024-05-13

1.Junior solution: because the coefficient before x 2 is greater than 0, the axis of symmetry = 3 4, that is, the minimum value is taken when x = 3 4, f(3 4) = -9 16-m makes f(3 4)>0 get m<-9 16, because f(-1) = 1 + 3 2-m, f(1) = -1 2-m has f(-1) > f(1). >>>More

9 answers2024-05-13

Well, there is no square in the process, and the value of m is not 3 >>>More