Disputes: Who can give a legal answer

You can go to court to sue the other party and demand payment for the goods, and the change of company name will not affect you.

According to your description:

Your company changes its name, which is a common phenomenon in the company's operation process, don't worry, it's easy to solve. Your unit's application for name change has been filed with the Industrial and Commercial Bureau, and after the change, the Industrial and Commercial Bureau will send a notice of name change to your unit. It has the seal of the Industrial and Commercial Bureau, and the notice can prove that the name of your unit has only changed, and the subject has not changed.

If your organization can't find the document. You can also bring the official seal of the unit and a copy of the business license to the industrial and commercial bureau to obtain it directly.

Send the name change file to the other party. If the other party still does not approve, then the other party is likely to be in debt. That can only be resolved through court proceedings. The court recognizes the name change document.

Hope it helps.

The change of the name of the enterprise is a common act in business, and it does not change the legal responsibilities and obligations before the name change, so the contract should continue to be performed. To this end, countermeasures and precautions:

1. You can salute first and then soldier: send a lawyer's letter. If the other party ignores it, it can enter the lawsuit according to the agreed jurisdiction.

3. Find a lawyer to do an investigation on the industrial and commercial registration to prove that the company is only a name change, and not two corporate legal persons.

The above can be promoted by the enterprise itself, and in order to be quick and effective, it is recommended to entrust a lawyer to deal with it.

1. Can directly sue the unit;

2. The court of the defendant's domicile (note Sun Yu's register) or the place where the contract is performed has jurisdiction;

3. It is difficult to obtain the support of the court for a simple IOU, and the evidence data of the economic exchanges between the two parties should be submitted.

Hello.

Article 239 of the Penal Code, which provides for the death penalty for causing death, is a disability and therefore shall not be applied.

2. Liu only heard about the wine, and there was no premeditation with the winery in advance, so it was not a joint crime; Liu clearly knew that the liquor was adulterated with toxic substances and sold it, and should be investigated for criminal responsibility for the crime of selling toxic and harmful food; C was inaccurate, so B should be chosen.

1. A is certainPerson A kidnaps and injures the kidnapped person, causing him or her to become disabled. The death penalty may only be applied if the abductee dies or kills the abducted person, as provided by law. Please see the legal requirements below.

According to the provisions of Article 239 of the Criminal Law, a case shall be filed in any of the following circumstances: (1) Whoever kidnaps another person for the purpose of extorting property, or kidnaps another person as a hostage, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years or life imprisonment, and shall also be fined or confiscated property; where the circumstances are more minor, a sentence of between 5 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given. (2) Whoever commits the offence referred to in the preceding paragraph and causes the death of the abducted person or kills the abducted person shall be sentenced to death and confiscation of property.

3) Stealing infants and young children for the purpose of extorting property shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs.

2. d is the next certaintyThe village-run distillery and Liu constituted a joint crime. Because, Liu knew that the bulk liquor produced by a village-run distillery was cheap, and although there was a small amount of toxic substances, he also purchased a large number of them and resold them to a number of commissaries, and there was a common intention with the distillery.

The first question D, it should be A, B, and C, that the suspects are all intentional homicides, and only D is manslaughter.

Question B, Liu is aware of the toxic components of liquor, and the sale of poisoned liquor seriously threatens the lives and health of citizens, and criminal responsibility is investigated, not just a fine or confiscation of property.

Question 1 is undisputed a The other three choices all resulted in death. Question 2 is multiple-choice b c d

Send a notice letter to them (Chen's younger brother and wife), ask them to submit the relevant contract and a copy of their ID card to us for verification (keep on file), and they must provide Chen's power of attorney, and then hand over the company's detailed certificate information (copy) to Chen to settle the project payment, if they do not provide it, refuse to provide it. And immediately report to the company's leaders to make specific decisions.

You need to send them a text message asking for the appropriate information and submit it to you for review as soon as possible.

Text messages have the force of law, and you keep them well.

If it is determined that the injury is slight, the police station may be requested to arrest the person for administrative detention;

In addition, you can also file a lawsuit with the court for civil compensation;

Compensation items include: medical expenses, lost work expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, accommodation expenses, hospital meal subsidies, necessary nutrition expenses, if the victim is disabled due to injury, the necessary expenses incurred due to the increase in living needs and the loss of income caused by the loss of working ability, including disability compensation, mental damages, disability assistive device expenses, and necessary expenses, nursing expenses, and follow-up expenses actually incurred due to nursing care and continuation.

The compensation standard varies from place to place, so it is recommended to appoint a lawyer** and calculate the relevant compensation amount.

Let's be specific, how can you help you like this?

What is the question you are asking?

1. When people's courts hear divorce cases, they shall properly resolve the issue of child support from the perspective of benefiting the children's physical and psychological health and protecting the children's lawful rights and interests, and in consideration of the specific circumstances such as the parents' ability to support and the conditions for raising them.

2. On the maintenance of children.

1. Children under the age of two generally live with their mothers. If the mother has any of the following circumstances, she may live with the father:

1) Suffering from incurable infectious diseases or other serious diseases, and the children are not suitable to live with them;

2) There are conditions for raising children who do not fulfill their obligation to support them, and the father requires the child to live with him;

3) The child is unable to live with the mother due to other reasons.

2. Where both parents agree that a child under two weeks old will live with the father and there is no adverse impact on the healthy growth of the child, it may be permitted.

3. For children over the age of two years, both the father and the mother request to live with them, and one of the following circumstances may be given priority:

1) Have undergone sterilization or have lost their fertility due to other reasons;

2) The child has lived with the child for a long time, and the change of living environment is obviously detrimental to the healthy growth of the child;

3) There are no other children, and the other party has other children;

4) The child lives with him/her, which is beneficial to the child's growth, but the other party suffers from an infectious disease or other serious disease that cannot be cured for a long time, or has other circumstances that are not conducive to the child's physical and mental health, and it is not suitable to live with the child.

4. The conditions for the father and the mother to raise the child are basically the same, and both parties require the child to live with the child, but if the child has lived alone with the grandparents for many years, and the grandparents request and have the ability to help the child take care of the grandchild or grandchild, it may be considered as a priority condition for the child to live with the father or mother.

5. In the event of a dispute between the parents over the age of 10 over that a minor child over the age of 10 should live with his or her father, the child's opinion shall be taken into account.

Under the premise that the man's support is more conducive to the child's growth.

Go to the labor bureau and the arbitration brigade and sue them directly, sometimes I think the employees are easy to bully.

The reason is not established, but the doctor still needs to bear some responsibility, and the specific proportion of responsibility is determined by the court at its discretion. The reasons are as follows:1

The doctor is not primarily responsible for the delay, the doctor is acting in good faith, and the causal relationship between the cause of the child's death and the delay is still to be determined; 2.Based on professional judgment, the doctor should be sent to the hospital in time at this time, but the doctor did a simple ** first, which is the main basis for the doctor's responsibility.

Do not worry.

First of all, according to your description, the other party's injuries are not serious. That is, it is likely to be below a minor injury. If the injury is less than minor, it does not constitute a criminal offence and there is no need to worry about sentencing.

Secondly, the other party is obviously suspected of being coerced. If it is a minor injury, it will be detained at the police station for a few days at most, and a fine of several hundred will be imposed. The rest is the medical bills. There's nothing to be afraid of.

Thirdly, the medical expenses should be compensated according to the invoice of the regular hospital, and the other party's asking price should not be ignored. Big deal to go to court.

Finally, if you don't have any injuries on the surface, you should also go to the hospital. Keep the invoice, useful.

Of course, if the injury is actually more serious and constitutes more than a minor injury, you have to be careful. Let's break the bank.

Because a puppy with two owners fighting, it really shouldn't be. Fortunately, the eyes are not blind, if the eyes are blind, the matter will be big, is it still a problem that can be solved with 10,000 yuan, no, one goes to prison to eat prison food, and the other is disabled for life, it can be said that the life of the two people will not be easy.

Whether 10,000 yuan is more or less, you have to speak with the ticket, see how much money is spent, and finally know how much or less. If the negotiation fails, the court will file a lawsuit, and the court will make a judgment.

Then look at the ticket and calculate, how can you know how much money should be compensated.

Compensation is inevitable, not to mention medical expenses.

As long as the other party can get a valid certificate from the hospital.

First of all, this is a public security case, but also involves civil disputes, both parties do it, both parties are responsible, in the case of the other party's injury, you have to bear the medical expenses, but 10,000 yuan is definitely a joke, if you want to accompany less then I suggest you also go to the hospital, so that you are also slightly injured, if the police station mediates, I don't think you need 10,000 yuan, if the police station mediation does not detain you, I suggest to detain, not more than 15 days, you go to the other party will also be detained, I hope it will help you.