What do you think is the criterion for dividing civilization from barbarism?

Barbarism has the beauty of barbarism, and civilization has the beauty of civilization. The difference between the two in terms of aesthetics is the difference between stupidity and wisdom. Aesthetics is defined by the outlook on life.

And values-driven, ordinary people's values to feel the beauty of civilization, will only think of the need for reciprocal communication to promote civilization, but this is not the real civilization. True civilization is based on the law of fairness and justice. Savagery is not knowing anything other than knowing how to vent and satisfy one's desires.

Barbarism is extremely destructive because it is stupid and unintelligent.

Natural civilization and man-made barbarism and human civilization: people in primitive societies live in powerless natural civilization (natural civilization is natural civilization without the ability to destroy natural arrangements), people in national societies live in man-made barbarism with scientific and technological ability to destroy natural civilization, and people in future civilized societies live in human civilization that consciously maintains natural civilization. Human civilization should be a part of natural civilization, that is to say, human society originated from the natural world, and cannot be separated from the natural world on which it depends.

Human barbarism is relative to human social civilization, and human barbarism is also the natural barbarism of human beings, of course, it is not all, there is the concept of human alienation here.

There is no difference between civilized humans and savage species, they both know how to obtain benefits and enjoy power to obtain the needs of survival. In other words, the acquisition and enjoyment of power is an instinct that all living beings have, and there is no need for any civilized requirements and learning guidance. If human beings do not know how to assume social responsibilities and fulfill moral obligations for the power they have acquired and enjoyed, then there is no distinction between civilized human beings and those savage animals!

The distinguishing sign is violence. Barbarism is violence, civilization is the absence of violence. But the reality is not the same. Violence has never gone away. So I had to look for other signs. Barbarism is nature, civilization is unnatural.

On the spiritual level, civilization is to maintain social groups with belief ideology, and barbarism is to maintain social groups with instinctive ideology. Belief ideology is a unique mode of philosophical speculation of human beings, which means that human beings will think about why they should be human beings, or human beings know how to assume social responsibilities and fulfill social and moral obligations. Therefore, only human beings in the world have a high-level social civilization, while other species are in a low-level primitive barbaric state.

The so-called development of civilization is constrained by law and moral norms. In some rules, let human beings realize what can be done and what cannot be done. Which are civilized and which are barbaric.

Therefore, in modern society, it is easy for us to judge whether human behavior is right or wrong. Some people become civilized people, in fact, they also restrain certain things of nature, and the things of nature are not all good, there is no problem with doing what you want, but you must abide by the conventions of civilization.

Throughout the history of human development, from the ancient period of Ru Mao drinking blood to today's high-quality Baiwei, it can be said that the history of human development is the history of the evolution of human civilization, but is there no barbarian in modern society? Isn't there barbarism? The answer is no, barbarism, which means uncivilized, uncivilized, cruel, **, domineering, domineering, and rude!

The essential difference between civilization and barbarism does not lie in what clothes a person wears, even if it is a suit and leather shoes, it does not mean that this person is a civilized person, the difference in nature, in the inner thoughts of people, reflected externally, is whether a person's behavior and habits are in line with moral norms!

Personally, I feel that the essence of human nature is to do what you want. Without the restraints of civilization and morality, it is difficult to imagine how human civilization has developed so far. According to the theory that history is moving forward, human beings in primitive societies gradually moved from barbarism to civilization.

So how can you go to civilization. Can it be understood as a constant awakening of consciousness? From drinking blood at the beginning, to eating roasted meat after the invention of fire.

It's been a long and great process. With the awakening of consciousness, from barbarism to civilization.

That is to say, if the reason does not make sense, then it is necessary to take a little tough measures.

Interpretation: If we want to make our thinking avant-garde and advanced, we should first strengthen our physique. A strong body is the prerequisite for doing everything.

Source: *** Published in the Journal of Physical Education, 1917. "Neighbors have a saying:

Civilization is its spirit, and barbarism is its body. That's right. If you want to civilize its spirit, you must first barbarize its body; If Gou barbarizes his physique, the spirit of civilization will follow.

Marx famously asserted that "savage conquerors are always conquered by the higher civilization of those peoples they conquer". Throughout the history of the world, the following examples are most illustrative.

As a strong nomadic people, Mongolia was still in the desert culturally and economically in the era of cold weapons, but its military force was strong, so it swept through Asia and Europe, but in order to dominate the local ethnic groups whose culture and economy were much higher than their own, they had to learn the local culture, and finally integrated themselves into the local society.

This sentence means that when women don't know how to be women, let men give full play to the power of men.

That is to say, if the reason does not make sense, then it is necessary to take a bit of a strong approach.

That is to say, since I can't reason with you, I will subdue you.

Summary. Savage in the past is a derogatory term that refers to a person who is brutal and unreasonable, and since the screening of My Savage Girlfriend, the times have given the word a new meaning. It's not brutal, it's not capricious, it's not vexatious.

Rationally speaking, it is a kind of affectionate name for boys for the girls they like with personality, not necessarily beautiful, not necessarily charming, as long as the appearance is cute, there is personality and temperament, can be static and active, and there is something very internal is the most important.

Savage in the past is a derogatory term that refers to a person who is brutal and unreasonable, and since the screening of My Savage Girlfriend, the times have given the word a new meaning. It's not brutal, it's not capricious, it's not vexatious. Rationally say that it is a kind of affection for boys to have a personality for the girls they like, it doesn't have to be beautiful, it doesn't have to be charming, as long as it looks cute, has a personality and temperament, can be static and moving, and has a lot of inner brightness is the most important.

So what to think of the "savage civilized people".

It is Shanshan who is polite and polite. A civilized person who knows etiquette and honesty well about people and things. Barbarians, on the contrary, are arrogant and unreasonable, only think about themselves, lose their temper at every turn, and think that they are right, and if they are right, they are wise.

No, I mean to add a "barbaric" to the "civilized people" in front of the word "civilized people" to modify, that is to say, how the "savage civilized people" is understood.

This is civilized man. Think about it: a person who can't hold his leg due to inertia kicks and injures the opponent, after the game, they may exchange each other.

This is to say that the attitude towards the individual's blindness is the dividing line between civilization and barbarism. This is also the connotation of human nature. Yesterday on Weibo.

The other party is also quite cute, but it is very barbaric, but it is a civilized person.

Cultivated barbarians.

Praise the other party, that is to say, the "savage civilized slender man" is actually civilized in nature, and in a certain sense, it should be a compliment, and a "barbarian" should be understood in this way.

Plato said, "Man is a civilized animal, but he needs a proper education, or if he is poorly educated, he is the most barbarous animal" and "Every man must perform a duty in the state that best suits his nature". Brother, according to this, you think that Plato affirms and values the value of human beings

Oak Oak, thank you.

Sentence appreciation: "If civilization is not civilized enough, then let barbarism be barbaric enough." If civilization is not civilized enough, then let barbarism be barbaric enough.

If the strong man of mankind is inclined to wisdom, he does not need to take advantage of it. Moreover, his success will inevitably produce a result that everyone is happy with, and this result is the embodiment of civilization.

Those so-called strong people who base their success on the troubles, pains, and hatred of others are actually foolish, and ignorance makes them choose the law of the jungle. The law of the jungle is the law of the jungle, and it is a manifestation of barbarism rather than civilization.

Barbarism only knows that strength is achieved through invasion and plunder, and that strength from barbarism must not last long, because it will be met with universal resistance. The strongest of the strong is the stronger, and no one can be invincible forever from the weak.

Civilization is strong through invention and creation, and the core oak is strong in itself, and at the same time, it can bring benefits to others, and even allow everyone to share in its success. Such a strong man is the easiest to gain universal admiration, and people are generally willing to support him, and if they support him more than oppose him, it is easy for him to achieve long-term prosperity.

It's the same from the individual to the country. Choosing to be brutal, from invasion and plunder to becoming strong, is just a flash in the pan. Only by choosing civilization and becoming strong through invention and creation can it prosper forever.

Civilized people and savages have different brain functions.

Emotions are controlled by hormones, which are the main driving force for the actions of organisms in natural conditions. Civilized people, on the other hand, can manage these instinctive reactions through their brains. The brain of a civilized person generates more neural connections and controls them well.

In this way, you can smoothly excite, block, and restructure a large amount of information to dominate yourself. In this way, they acquire a crucial skill, which is the ability to deny the information they have constituted and the behavior they have stimulated. This greatly improves the viability of civilized people and allows them to make more correct judgments.

The barbarians do not have such abilities. Their brains are stuck in primitive "switch mode". A consciousness acts into a judgment, and whether the judgment is right or wrong, the consciousness switch is always on.

The previous switch can not be temporarily turned off until another consciousness is turned on. And there's no intermediate level between opening and closing, which is why some people are talking and laughing with you just now, and they can talk to you in the blink of an eye. It's all a hormonal manipulation reaction.

This primitive brain must execute once a message is stimulated, because they do not have the ability to self-correct like civilized people. So in the eyes of the barbarians, they are always right. If the facts do not match his judgment, it will be a great disservice to him, and he will try his best to change the facts to prove himself right.

For the barbarian, he must do what he wants, and he thinks that he can do it, and if he can't do it, it must be someone else's problem. Usually they want to enslave others to achieve themselves, because self-recognition is the first instinct of animals. For the barbarians, once opened, it cannot be closed.

Civilized people, on the other hand, are able to make reasonable judgments, take into account the various factors of the environment, and understand that there are some things that cannot be done.

Be reasonable, law-abiding, uphold rules, be kind to others, and be mentally healthy.

The reason for the classification is different because of the region and geographical environment. The grassland is a nomadic people in the north, the great river civilization lives on the abundant water and fertile soil, and the marine civilization relies on the sea to engage in overseas work. Generally depends on how it lives, the self-sufficient type is considered a large river, the predatory type is considered nomadic, and the colonial invasion is the sea.