A civil lawsuit concerning the death of B

It's all no, it's a very simple jurisprudence – because of causality at the legal level.

Just as a thief stepped on the window of A on the first floor and climbed up to the second floor B to steal and kill B, A is not responsible in any way, if the legal causal relationship is expanded to "one of the causes is related", then isn't it the thief's parents, the thief's teacher, and so on also to be liable?

I hope you can figure out that causality is to have a "necessity", and without necessity there is no causal relationship.

For example, in your case, student A committed suicide because he couldn't stand the bullying of student B, is it inevitable that students who are bullied all over the world will commit suicide? The same goes for the other two.

...Of course, theoretically no, all of them.

Without the inevitability of cause and effect, there can be no accountability.

I don't think so.

In the three cases, there was no direct legal causal relationship between A's death and B, and the occurrence of suicide was not inevitable.

It is generally difficult to adduce evidence depending on the degree of bullying, and it is difficult to say that "bullying" has reached the level of forcing people to death.

It's definitely not about falling out of love.

The third is certainly unrelated.

In civil disputes arising from criminal cases, no compensation for moral damages can be claimed.

1 No, but out of humanity, you should give some, after all, A bullies B!

A nature without any responsibility!!

1 The question is, how do you prove that Student A committed suicide because he couldn't stand Student B's bullying? If you can pay for moral damages.

The reason is that A's death is not directly related to B.

If B forced A to death (violent), then B can also be held criminally responsible.

The root of all the problems is how do you prove it? What the law wants is physical evidence, and confessions are not enough.

Moreover, according to the general principles of civil law: according to the principle that whoever sues shall present evidence, the plaintiff must produce physical evidence, and only a confession generally cannot win.

In general civil torts, the principle of fault liability is implemented. That is, the infringer is subjectively at fault (intentional or negligent) for the occurrence of the damage result. At the same time, there must be a causal relationship between the infringement and the result of the damage, and there must be a corresponding causal relationship.

In other words, under normal circumstances, and from the perspective of ordinary people's understanding, the infringement will lead to the occurrence of the damage result. Only then can it be concluded that the infringer is liable for the damage.

In your case, there is no substantial causal relationship between A's suicide and B's behavior. In other words, from the perspective of ordinary people, B's actions would not cause A to commit suicide under normal circumstances, and B did not have a subjective process for A's suicide, so I don't think B needs to be held responsible.

What is asserted in the civil lawsuit is who sues and who presents evidence!

Of the three events, 1... If it can be proved that B really bullied A, then a certain amount of compensation should be paid accordingly.

2 and 3 I personally believe that although there is a certain relationship between them, the occurrence of the damage result does not have a corresponding legal relationship with his behavior. Therefore, it does not assume the corresponding legal responsibility.

The subject of the right to declare disappearance and death is not the subject of the declaration, but the interested party, and the whole incident is transferred by the will of the subject of the right, which is of course a civil legal act, and it is a legal act of the interested party to exercise its rights (demanding the custody of property, demanding the performance of debts, inheritance or divorce).

Legal basis: Article 46 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China provides that in any of the following circumstances, the interested party may apply to the people's court for a declaration of the death of the natural person: (1) his whereabouts have been unknown for four years; (2) Due to an accident, his whereabouts have been unknown for two years.

Where the whereabouts of the natural person are unknown due to an accident, and it is proved by the relevant authorities that it is impossible for the natural person to survive, the application for a declaration of death is not subject to the two-year time limit.