Why is NASA, as the observer of the universe in the United States, decreasing its funding every year

NASA's annual research funding has been decreasing because it has two programs that have been around for many years and are still tasked with planetary science missionsIt didn't work as expected, so Obama has been cutting spending on it in recent years.

After 10 years and 36 kilometers of exploration, the $400 million Opportunity is operating scarred. Despite NASA's accomplishments, there are still some who believe that funding NASA is a waste of money. There were problems with the rear and the arm that carried the device, and the device confirming the minerals was ineffectiveThe team had to use a less sensitive sensor.

In contrast, Opportunity's successor, Curiosity, has everything on board and has the resources to roam Mars for another 10 or 20 years. "Opportunity" has already fulfilled its original mission, to be exact, twice. It found water-storing minerals a few meters from the landing site, although the water was brackish and harmful to life; Eight years later, it discovered other minerals formed from water, which not only carried life, but could also be the origin of life.

In 1961, John F. Kennedy decided to let NASA send humans to the moon by 1970. At that time, every American paid $20 a year to NASA. Kennedy wanted to raise that number to $26 in order to help astronauts reach the moon.

In 2015 currency, the budget of the Apollo era was equivalent to $200 per person per year to NASA. If NASA had been as well funded today as it was then, it would have a budget of $65 billion a year, when in reality it had a budget of only $17.5 billion. In 2014, every American actually paid $54 to NASA.

NASA scientists are also planning to send humans to Mars in 2030. Compared to the answers to these questions, NASA's cost is insignificant. But there is widespread agreement that there will be no more Apollo program in the space program.

NASA will never again receive as much funding as it did under KennedyThere will be no more Cold War, but people will always ask: What is in the universe? Are we alone?

And never stop the pursuit.

I don't think there will be a reduction in funding, after all, this project still needs a lot of financial support, and it should not be reduced.

NASA has already discovered the black hole, and it may be that the United States thinks that it can no longer monitor something, so it will reduce its funding.

Because NASA, as the U.S. observer of the universe, has not allowed the U.S. to achieve the expected cosmic observation effect, its funding has been decreasing every year.

Because although he exists, the results of his exploration are not as expected by the leaders of the United States, so its funding will gradually decrease.

Because NASA is very important, but it's a waste to keep moving forward, so you can reduce your expenses appropriately.

In recent years, there have been no outstanding results in space research, and the US economy has been declining year by year, and its support is limited. So the funding will be reduced.

The people who enter NASA are all top geniuses, and they are studying some cutting-edge topics, and it is difficult to break through the barriers, unless there is some great luck and epoch-making geniuses appear, in order to have outstanding results.

Although tens of billions of dollars are thrown every year, the United States has not shut down NASA, because the living environment of human beings on the earth will deteriorate at any time, and walking out of the earth is to pave a back road for all mankind, and these things do not have hundreds or even thousands of years of accumulation, it is impossible to complete, so if NASA suddenly breaks through one day, mankind will usher in a new world.

Maybe it's because the discoveries over the years have no real value, so the funding has become smaller.

This question, the landlord may wish to June 2014 (?) Astronomy Lovers", one of the articles is entitled "What is the use of astronomy"? I'm very sorry that I didn't bring this volume to school, so I'll briefly list a few points based on my understanding:

Some of the inventions that have been popularized in life - ballpoint pens, diapers, satellite communications, navigation systems, ......Having said that, compared to the great changes that other disciplines (physics, chemistry, biology) have brought to human society, the above points are not small, but they are always a little pitiful, right?

The essence of natural science - seeking knowledge or destroying cherry blossoms, seeking truth. These two points are the basic driving force for the development of science, and astronomy, as one of the six basic natural sciences, is no exception.

Long-term planning, strategic deployment. Tsiolkovsky, the master of cosmonautics, said: "The earth is the cradle of mankind, but man cannot live in the cradle forever, and at first he will carefully wear it out of the atmosphere of the shirt and then go to conquer the solar system."

If we can get a small amount of energy from space, it will be enough to completely change the world today. Perhaps there is no direct benefit from space development now, but this will certainly not be the case in 500 years, and the United States has gained an opportunity in this regard by relying on its strong comprehensive national strength.

Among the various sciences, it is easiest to blend with literature, aesthetics, and philosophy, and there is a very good saying that the meaning of the starry sky is to let us: "perceive smallness and pursue progress".

Many of his skills have been used in military or civilian areas, and have produced value returns, and the aerospace technology tracking technique represents a high level of scientific and technological research and development, which is of strategic significance. In particular, in the future, it is very likely that humans will actually immigrate to aliens.