How do you think that the United States should not let Europe suffer from the disaster of fish in t

The United States said that it should not let Europe suffer from the disaster of pond fish, which may be a protection for Europe, so this also shows the fuel consumption of their two countries and their friendship in daily life. <>

Because the United States and China will inevitably have some interests in Europe in the middle of the war, he will threaten some European countries with some issues of import tariffs, so I hope that the United States will not use this to threaten Europe. <>

First of all, the United States is a country that is very dishonest, he said that Europe should not suffer such problems, just for its own interests, I don't think there is any need to pay too much attention to this issue, as long as it is clear about its own national interests.

This is a normal phenomenon, and I think this approach is also very correct, because the United States pays more attention to the ecological environment, so he does not want to cause environmental degradation in their European countries because of the disaster of pond fish.

I think the United States is playing the image of a good person, in fact, they themselves are the destroyers of this world, but they themselves feel that they are maintaining peace, which is really ironic.

If the United States ** decides to raise tariffs on the EU, then the European Commission and the EU must be ready to make all the appropriate decisions, in this case, it will bring some economic ** war to Europe and even the world.

This is a bad thing, and it doesn't exist at all, and the reason why the United States says this is because it wants to show off its strength to others, but in fact, the power of the United States is not so good.

The current United States can be said to be very hegemonic, and it has done very badly in some things, but it still says that it should not let Europe suffer from the disaster of pond fish, but in fact, things are not so simple.

What Le Maire means is that France is willing to commit to the future of the ** system, because we have to create a new multilateral ** system, but the United States must first give up its tariff threats, and he feels that they have been treated unfairly.

Although he said so, if it really happened, I think it would be very difficult for him to do it, because economic things are not easy for one person to achieve with a word, and even more so if it is related to personal interests, it is even more difficult to implement.