AMD2000 Which one is equivalent to galloping? Is Motherboard 845 too old?

AMD's CPU frequency algorithm is special, but it is very easy to identify, because AMD is to make it clear to everyone, so the use of 2000+ representation method shows that the main frequency of other CPUs is the same, so 2000+ is equivalent to Pentium.

The motherboard is 845, which is indeed old, probably two or three years ago.

The comprehensive performance is equivalent to that the 845 motherboard is very old, and I feel that it has been 6 years.

You can't use the 845 main version, the main version that AMD2000 can use is nforce2, KT400, etc., and the 845 main version supports Saiyang, Ben 4 (478 pins).

The performance is stronger than Saiyang 2GHz, the gaming performance is stronger than Ben 4 2GHz, and the office performance is weaker than Ben 4 2GHz

The main version is something that was released a few years ago. Are you old, you say?

The AMD2000+ is divided into different cores.

amd athlon xp 2000+ thoroughbredamd barton 2000+

amd thorton 2000+

It feels like Athlon is better, and it is the same level as the Pentium 4.

According to AMD's habits, it is quite P4, but in actual use, it feels better than P4.

If you don't know how to pretend to understand, how do you know that AMD's main frequency is equivalent to? It's too much to lift AMD, how many are 2800+? I can't say exactly how much, but I can say that there is none.

If the X4 845 is listed, the positioning should be to replace the X4 840, because the performance is still low due to the main frequency, and it is recommended to consider 860K and 870K performance if possible.

The real core of this slightly longer die core Sempron 2200+ processor is "Thorton", which is no longer the thoroughbred B core used by the old core Sempron. In fact, if you calculate it, Thorton also belongs to the processor of the Barton series of cores, Barton has 512KB L2 cache, while Thorton shields half of it, and only provides 256KB L2 cache. Therefore, Barton is mostly used in Athlon's XP 2500+ and above processors, while Thorton cores are used in Athlon's XP 2400+ 2200 2000+.

Although AMD has deliberately blocked the 256K L2 cache of Thorton's Athlon-XP processor before, for some DIYER players with strong hands-on ability, as long as they connect the processor's L2 gold bridge with silver paint, they can open another 256K cache, so that the Athlon-XP of Thorton core can be transformed into the same as Barton core, and also has 512K second-level cache for higher performance.

The two cores basically say that the performance is the same, but Thorton has the opportunity to change it to Barton. Because Barton blocked the 256KBL2cache. It's time to change it, and you have to DIY ability.

Unceasing...

Don't mess with those things. If you change it, there will be no warranty. It is also possible that the modification will fail.

810 is the motherboard of the Pentium 3 era, that is, it supports the Pentium 3 and the corresponding Tualatin core Celeron 3,845 motherboard supports the 478-pin port Pentium 4A and B series CPUs, because it only supports 533MHz front-side bus, so after installing the Pentium 4 C series CPU, which is also a 478-pin port, it cannot play its 800MHz front-end bus, and the main frequency will also be reduced (nominal frequency * 533 800), so this is not supported. The Celeron 4 is a 478-pin CPU, 32-bit, and is a low-end product of the 478-pin Pentium 4, with a front-side bus of 400MHz and a L2 cache of 128KB. Celeron D, is a 64-bit CPU, front-side bus 533MHz, L2 cache 256K (individual new products 512K), is a new 775-pin port CPU, is a low-end product of 64-bit Pentium 4.

The pins are the same, and they should be backwards compatible with the CPU.

The above is very clear, D is probably dual-core dual-core.

Tell you a formula that can convert the main frequency between AMD and Intel (AMD 2 500) 3=Intel

For example, if yours is 2000, then this is how it is calculated (2000 2 500) 3=1500MHz, probably, athlon can be compared with P4, and Sembleon and Celeron can be compared.

Therefore, according to the main frequency, AMD2000 is not as good as Bensi.

Besides, AMD2000 is now very low-end, and AMD dual-core 3600+ is only more than 400 fast money.

Now that dual-core is so cheap, why do you still buy such a low-end CPU? It is recommended that you buy a dual-core AMD 3600+ or so.

AMD is also divided into two kinds: Flash Dragon and Athlon Clan, I can't remember the name, the first letter of the word Flash Dragon is S, and the first letter of Athlon is A.

The Shining Dragon 2000+ is equivalent to Celeron's, while the Athlon 2000+ is equivalent to the Galloping one.

So the AMD2000+ above is definitely not as good as the Ben 4.

The stability is about the same, and Intel generates less heat. If you want to talk about performance, the AMD performance in the same price range of that era was about 20% higher than Intel. Both CPUs happen to be used by me.

The first one is a little more stable, I think.

Suggest the former, and then say that 875 is also a luxury board, "Huashi" are you sure it's not ASUS? If it's ASUS, don't think about it, that's it, Panzheng has a notorious reputation for explosive capacitors.

Wait for love. Accustomed to having you.

Not Aslon. Named Athlon, and Flashdragon are two different CPUs produced by AMD, which are equivalent to the Pentium P4 and Seyan.

The real frequency of Athlon 2000+ is: 2000*2 3-200.

At the same time, it is a little lower than the Pentium CPU, because the Pentium uses 775 pins, while the Semblem or Athlons use 754 pins, of course, there are higher 939 940 1024 pins, which are of course better than the simple Pentium 4.

Don't think that the galloping is good, as most people often say.

In general, AMD's products are cheaper. It is the preferred product for some RMB. And the performance is not below the same Pentium products.

It's about the same as 2500+, running 3D and P4 is the same, but doing the rest.

What is Aslon, I haven't seen it

inter845 is the master version.

The AMD2000+ is a CPU

256m is memory.

40G is a hard drive.

G4 is a family of graphics cards.

64M is the video memory of the graphics card.

17 inches is a monitor (I think it should be a pure product).

The one on the second floor is a bit too much, it's not that the computer can't be used, it's that the preparation is outdated, and it's hard to use, and it's not unusable.

The chipset of the motherboard is Inter845, the CPU is AMD2000+, the memory is 256M, the hard disk is 40G, and the G4 64M means that the graphics card is NVEDIA, G4 series, 64M size. 17-inch monitor.

The problem is that Inter's chipset doesn't support AMD.

Intel845 motherboard chip model, about 3 4 years ago.

AMD2000+ is AMD's CPU model, a hardcore chip.

256M should be the memory capacity.

40G hard drive.

G4: GeforeC4 NVIDA graphics chip, very old 64M seems to be video memory.

17 is undoubtedly a monitor.

If this is a computer, not only will it not work, but it will be old.

My computer is worse than that, and it's still in service, only when the VCD is used ......