-
Haha, this question is somewhat interesting, I believe this is a question that the teacher came up with, and there should be no standard answer. I have such an explanation here. One can consider a society in which good people (stolen) and thieves.
Then the thief's work and income are all ordinary people, which means that the thief's business activities are negative for the people. Then the common people must hope that there are no thieves in the world. From a social point of view, people will take certain precautions in order to prevent theft, which can be regarded as an investment (including energy investment, anti-theft equipment resource investment), the amount of investment depends on the risk of loss, the greater the risk, the greater the investment.
And the size of the risk only depends on the number of thieves in the society (everyone is an uncle of raccoon dogs, everyone is at the same level), and the social population is certain. When there are more thieves, on the one hand, it means that there are relatively fewer people, on the other hand, due to the excessive risk of theft, the people's anti-theft measures are stronger, so the income of thieves becomes smaller, and some thieves quit the industry and change careers to become ordinary people; When there are fewer thieves, because the risk becomes smaller, the people's prevention measures decrease, the number of ordinary people increases, the income of thieves increases, and more people enter the industry, then the number of thieves will eventually balance to a certain level. In extreme cases, it can be assumed that the number of thieves is zero, and the people have no precautions (they do not close their doors at night, and the money is placed in the yard), and because the investment in energy and anti-theft equipment is too low, people are more likely to forget and lose their items, which is a loss of efficiency for the society, so if the thieves exist as a means to improve the prevention of loss, it is beneficial to the society.
This should be able to make some mathematical models, but unfortunately I don't have time to think about it, so you can see for yourself.
-
If it weren't for bad thieves, a lot of people wouldn't have a struggle between good and bad in their minds, and they wouldn't have produced great people.
There's a catfish effect in economics. Let's see if we can match it.
-
Let me explain first, the people wearing Little Red Riding Hood in the car are all people who belong to Ge You's theft group, I don't know if you have noticed this.
Continuing with the topic. If Andy had been looking at the stupid root, the money would not have been lost, but on the way to donate blood, Ge You set up a bureau, he didn't do it himself, he asked the old man in the gang to pretend to go to the luggage rack to get something, and then touched a kettle, and below it happened to be a baby (the woman holding the baby was also a thief group), if the kettle hit the baby, it would cause injury, in this case, whoever saw it would come to the rescue, not to mention Andy didn't expect this to be a bureau, so he subconsciously distracted his attention, I caught the kettle.
At this time, Silly Gen was also out of Andy's protection, so Li Bingbing easily succeeded and stole Silly Gen's money.
Andy returned to his seat and thought about it for a while, only to know that he had been tricked, and there was a scene replay in the film, which made you feel that the old man, the kettle, and the baby were all arranged.
So this is what Ge You said, "The thief loses at a glance", only those who can see through this game at a glance will not lose, and Andy loses, because he still has humanity and a kind side. And being able to design such a bureau also shows that Ge You is an old fritter. This is a brilliant part of the film.
You take a closer look at the film to see if what I said is right, hehe.
-
Ge You used a hook to take the money away from the ceiling version.
-
I don't remember that there was a Guo Donglin and Cai Ming, celebrating Hong Kong's return to the motherland, which is very interesting.
-
Synonymous with no thieves in the world: never close the door at night.
Idiom]: The night is not closed.
Pinyin]: yè bù bì hù
Explanation]: Household: Door. You don't need to latch the door when you sleep at night. Describe the social security situation as good.
Example to form a sentence]: The people of the two rivers, Xinle is peaceful, the night is not closed, and the road is not left behind. Ming Luo Guanzhong's "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is the eighty-seventh chapter.
synonyms]: The road is not forgotten, the chicken and the dog are not frightened, Guotai Min'an [antonyms]: black smoke miasma, dirty mess, jackal in charge of the road [lantern riddle]: emergency room.
Usage]: as subject, predicate, object, definite; It means that social order is good.
-
There are no thieves in the world, at the beginning, he drove into the villa and scolded the security guard.
You forget about opportunity costs and comparative advantage in economics, there are things that can be made profitable by specialization and **. Economics is not like war, where you die or you die, it can be a win-win situation. Countries are likely to exploit their strengths and avoid their weaknesses. >>>More
Nobel Prize in Economics.
Recipient: Paul Samuelson. >>>More
Let's say the principle of diminishing marginal utility, right? If you are hungry and you like to eat steamed buns, then when you eat the first steamed bun, you like it very much, the second one may not like it so much, the third one is okay, the fourth one is already full, and the fifth one can't eat it. The sixth one is annoyed when he sees it! >>>More
Famous brands are luxury goods, and the elasticity of demand is greater than 1, that is, when consumers' income increases, they will increase their consumption. The power of consumer consumption comes from the utility that the goods bring to consumers, and the utility satisfaction brought by famous brands to consumers is different, which represents the quality, taste and status of the brand, so that the consumers have a strong sense of satisfaction. This kind of satisfaction is incomparable to the utility brought by the commodity itself, and this satisfaction that marks the status is extremely high, if it declines, the pursuit of luxury consumers will reduce this satisfaction, and then reduce consumption. >>>More
Because of the major, economics has always been inseparable from learning, and it is the core of the ribbon that connects various courses. In life, many phenomena need to be explained by economic principles, and many problems must revolve around it. >>>More