Lovers are cohabitants。。。。。。

That's great! Isn't it nice to think about something?

I can't accept that my partner has a history of cohabitation because it goes against traditional family and morality. First, some people may think that cohabitation affects the stability of the marriage. I believe that cohabitation can make romantic relationships more relaxed and casual, lacking the rigor and commitment required for marriage.

In addition, cohabitation may make people more prone to boredom and coldness, which can lead to breakups or divorces. Second, some people may think that cohabitation is an immoral act that goes against traditional family values. Marriage should be based on commitment, respect, and faithfulness, not simply living and sharing a life.

Cohabitation can undermine such traditional values, and faith failure leads to less faith and respect for marriage and family. However, we should also recognize that cohabitation does not necessarily affect the stability of the marriage and does not necessarily violate morals and values. Cohabitation is just one option, and everyone has the right to choose the lifestyle they want.

If a person's partner has a history of cohabitation, we should respect their choice and should not be prejudiced or discriminated against because of this. Most importantly, we should respect each other's choices and beliefs, and not put too much pressure and restrictions on love and marriage. A healthy and stable marriage can only be established on the basis of mutual respect and trust.

I've always felt that the two of them are already living together, and at this time, the expenses of the two people and the cost of living expenses are then used in the way of the AA system, which is a bit uncomfortable, mainly because the relationship between the two people is a couple, not the relationship of ordinary friends.

First of all, I do not accept the AA system in a cohabitation state. If it is a simple relationship, the future of the two people is not clear, in this case, the AA system should indeed be adopted. This is also to avoid unnecessary troubles once two people break up.

But since the two have chosen to live together, it means that the relationship between the two people is already very strong, and there is only one wedding left. In this case, the AA system shows that the two people are not particularly in love with each other, nor are they particularly trusting.

Secondly, it shows that the relationship between the two people is not particularly good. The really good relationship is that you have me, I have you, and there is no distinction between each other. I will not care about who spends more and who spends less, especially a man, who should show the demeanor of a humble gentleman, and should take special care of girls.

And this kind of calculation shows that the relationship between two people is deep enough, and the love between two people is not particularly serious and defensive.

Third, it is not conducive to the further development of the relationship between two people. The cost of cohabitation also has to be AA system, which shows that the two people have no long-term plans, but they live together because of a momentary impulse. Once you encounter a little contradiction and problem, it is possible to break up.

If you really love each other, you won't be so concerned about money, and after a long time, the relationship between the two will become weaker and weaker.

So my point of view on this matter is: either you don't choose to live together, so that there is not too much intersection in money, and you will not look embarrassed to spend your own money. But once you choose to live together, don't AA system, don't worry too much about who spends more and who spends less, two people come together because of love, love is more important than money.