Is the relationship between the capitalist and the worker a personal dependency?

The relationship between the capitalist and the worker is not one of personal dependence.

Expansion:

The essential feature of capitalist ownership is that the capitalists rely on the means of production.

appropriation, the hiring of workers to perform labor under the cover of the principle of equivalent exchange, the appropriation of the surplus value of the hired workers.

Historically, the slave social system.

Both the feudal and capitalist social systems are systems of exploitation, but the difference is that under different systems of exploitation, the combination of laborers and the means of production is different. In a slave society, the union of the slave with the means of production was based on the complete physical possession of the slave by the slave owner. In feudal society, the combination of peasants and means of production was conditional on the personal dependence of peasants on landlords.

in the capitalist system.

The capitalists own the means of production and the products of their labor, while the laborers have nothing and can only survive by selling their labor. Unlike the previous system of exploitation, the relationship between the capitalist and the worker is not one of complete possession or personal dependence, but is based on the complete personal freedom of the laborer. The capitalist can only combine the laborers who have sold their labor power with the means of production to produce and obtain surplus value by purchasing labor power.

Here, the means of production and money take the form of capital, the owners of the means of production become the capitalists personified by capital, and the relationship between capitalists and laborers is the relationship between capital and labor. The essence of capitalist ownership is the capitalist ownership system by virtue of the possession of the means of production, under the cover of the principle of equivalent exchange, to hire workers to perform labor and to appropriate the surplus value of wage workers.

No. The relationship between the capitalist and the worker is one of hire and employed, based on the capitalist owning all the means of production.

On the basis of this, there is a new type of relationship between exploitation and exploitation.

Marx. The argument is that the broad masses of the working class.

In labor (there is complex labor, and there is also simple labor), this is the labor theory of value. In this way, the value is created by the workers, and a part of the value is the surplus value appropriated by the capitalists.

Naturally, the capital accumulated by the workers is necessarily created by the labor of the workers, so the great social wealth caused by the accumulation of capital is also created by the laborers, that is, the broad working class.

Capitalist workers are paid wages according to the hours they work or the results of their labor. On the surface, it seems that the workers and the rest of the line are selling not labor but labor; The wages paid by the capitalist to the worker are not the value or ** of the labor force, but the value or ** of the labor. However, this is an illusion that wages are not the value or ** of labor, and the reason for this is:

1. Labor must exist independently before it is sold, and when the worker has a buying and selling relationship with the capitalist in the labor market, his labor activity does not yet exist, and the labor of the wage worker is carried out after the end of the sale. After the end of the sale, the worker's labor is carried out under the supervision of the capitalist, and it no longer belongs to the worker, and the worker has no right to sell the labor as a commodity.

2. The value of commodities is the materialization of human general labor, and the value of the value is determined by the amount of labor time. If labor is a commodity, the value of labor is determined by labor, which is a meaningless repetition of synonyms. The value of labour itself cannot be determined by labour, any more than weight itself has no special weight.

3. If labor is a commodity, according to the principle of equivalent exchange, the wages paid by the capitalist are equal to the value created by all the labor of the laborer. In this way, the capitalist cannot get the surplus value, and capitalist production does not exist.

This view is wrong.

The wages of workers in capitalist society are not the remuneration of workers' labor. There are two parts to the value created by the labor of workers:

A part is paid to the workers by the capitalists in the form of wages, and it is only a small part of the labor creation of the workers to maintain the necessary livelihood of the workers and their families, that is, the reproduction of the labor force;

Another stupid remnant, which is appropriated by the capitalists without compensation, is the source of the capitalists' fortune. If the wages paid by the capitalists to the workers were the remuneration for all the labor of the workers, then there would be no exploitative relations between the capitalists and the workers, and there would be no gap between the rich and the poor between the capitalists and the workers.

The capitalist pays the worker in the form of wages and claims that it is the remuneration for all the worker's labour, in order to conceal the relationship between the capitalist and the worker that leads to exploitation and exploitation

No. The relationship between the capitalist and the worker is the relationship between the hired and the employed, which is based on the capitalist's possession of all the means of production, a new type of relationship between exploitation and exploitation.

Marx argues that the broad masses of the working class are working (there is complex labor and simple labor), and this is the labor theory of value. In this way, value is created by the workers, and a part of the value, that is, the surplus value that is appropriated by the capitalists, is naturally created by the workers, and the capital accumulated by the surplus value is also necessarily created by the labor of the workers, so the huge social wealth caused by the accumulation of capital is also created by the laborers, that is, the broad working class.

Answer] :d essence of capitalist wage delay is the transformation of the value of labor power or **. The wages paid to workers by capitalists are not the value or ** of the workers' labor, but the value of the labor force. Therefore, choose D.

It's not helpful to say more, to summarize my opinion:

1. There is non-exploitation of capital profits**;

2. Changing the situation of oversupply of labor can help increase the value of labor and reduce or eliminate exploitation; Therefore, it is necessary to control the population, encourage investment, and increase the number of capitalists;

3. Public ownership is actually official ownership, which cannot eliminate corruption and polarization, but on the contrary, it has increased many problems such as widespread poverty, lack of goods, low efficiency, and high-pressure politics. If it weren't for the problems of public ownership, the people of China and the Soviet Union would not have been able to abandon public ownership;

4. Private ownership has its problems, but the practice of Western countries shows that these problems can be gradually solved or mitigated; Moreover, the West is now practicing a "mixed economy": private ownership is used in areas where private ownership is appropriate, and public ownership is used in places where public ownership is appropriate.

5. It is impossible to have a good horse and a horse not to eat grass. Unless you provide your own free capital to the workers ("communist companies"), do not blame the capitalists for profit. However, it is possible to influence the distribution ratio in favor of the laborers;

6. It is necessary to improve the situation of oversupply of labor, and the specific method is to advocate increasing the supply of capitalists, so that the capitalists will be oversupplied and fighting, so that the capitalists will compete to raise the wages of workers and attract labor force in short supply.

In the simplest sentence, a capitalist is a person who exploits the laborer, and the laborer is the one who takes the skin and flesh to the market and sells it to the capitalist.

There is a difference between this. In a capitalist country, the laborer can only be oppressed and exploited by the entire capitalist class!

Incorrectly, the capitalist treats the laborer as an exploitative from the beginning. Wages are only tools for exercising their functions, and I believe that the remuneration of labor is accidental, not controlled by the will, and it should be worker-centered, and the worker is governed. So I don't think the above is correct.