There are more than 2 months left before the exam, how can I revise for the essay?

Hello, the teachers of the Central Political Correction Center will answer for you wholeheartedly.

Since there is plenty of time before the exam, it is recommended that you take two steps when revising:

Step 1: Buy reference books. By reading the reference books, you can get a general understanding of each question type, and you can also learn about some common test preparation mistakes. (It takes about half a month).

Step 2: Practice the past papers repeatedly. Because the essay test only focuses on the five major question types (inductive summary questions, countermeasure questions, comprehensive analysis questions, applied essay writing questions, and essay writing questions), only through the practice of real questions can the learned theories be put into practice, so as to grasp the problem solving rules behind each question type, so that the review can get twice the result with half the effort.

It can be raised, not rotten or things to be abandoned.

It mainly tests the candidate's reading comprehension ability, comprehensive analysis ability, ability to ask and solve problems, implementation ability, and written expression ability, and has the function of simulating the daily work of civil servants.

Argument refers to a style of writing that is extended and discussed for a given material or a specific topic, and it is a new style that has emerged and been implemented with the civil service recruitment examination system. It has an average score of around 40.

As a test method for selecting talents, the proposition of the application is very accurate and scientific, and it is a scientific assessment method developed on the basis of fully absorbing the advantages of policy theory, basic writing and official document writing, which aims to test the actual ability of students.

Literally, "Shen" can be understood as representation, defense, and affirmation, while "Commentary" is to discuss, discuss, and demonstrate. The so-called argument is to expound a point of view and explain the reasons for a certain issue, and reasonably deduce the logical relationship between the material and the material, as well as between the viewpoint and the material.

The "Treatise on Deuteronomy" has a distinct distinction from the others. It is not the kind of grand argument that selects materials based on subjective likes and dislikes and shows off one's personality to the fullest, but requires an accurate grasp of certain objective facts, making necessary explanations and statements, and then expressing pertinent opinions, putting forward strategies, and conducting arguments on this basis.

As a style of examination dedicated to the selection and recruitment of state civil servants, Shen Yi appropriately draws on some experiences and practices of "policy theory" in the ancient imperial examination in China. "Strategy" and "Argument" are both methods of selecting talents, both of which require candidates to show outstanding writing skills, analytical and judgment skills, and the proposed countermeasures (plans) must be feasible. However, the "arguments" are more realistic and pertinent than the "policy theories" in terms of content, and are more flexible and changeable than the "policy theories" in terms of form.

Most of the "policy theories" require candidates to discuss some major issues, that is, to demonstrate the feasibility and rationality of a national policy or countermeasure, focusing on the candidates' ability to solve problems. The essay requires candidates to discover and solve problems from a large number of realistic materials that reflect the problems of the Japanese group, and comprehensively examines the quality and potential of candidates in collecting and processing all kinds of daily information, which fully embodies the characteristics of the information age and meets the needs of the actual work of today's state civil servants.

Organize the important knowledge points of the argument, do not have to do difficult questions, the foundation is fundamental, do not focus on a spring sock topic in each exam, relax your mind, prepare a notebook and a set of wrong questions, and use the set of wrong questions to record the questions you have done wrong, and record some details and key points that are easy to ignore. Don't rush, in short, be confident and believe that you can do it.

One, buy books....Memorize, two, look at more practical questions, focus interviews, and so on, and accumulate experience!

Third, I also want to watch some legal programs, "Today's Statement" and "Everyone's Opinion" to learn legal knowledge.

Fourth, that's your own eloquence.