How about D90 with 16 70 Teng faucet, please teach with high fingers

What do you buy a camera for? So:

1.If you buy it for your own play, then I recommend Nikon's machine, the Nikon camera has good sharpness, and it shoots clearly and is suitable for landscape shots when you go out.

2.If the configuration is for the photo studio to open a store, it is recommended to buy a Canon camera, the Canon camera shoots the **soft, suitable for shooting portraits. Besides, in order to develop higher in the future. It is necessary to choose Canon's high-end camera machine, which is much more cost-effective than Nikon's high-end camera.

3 Fujifilm machines are not recommended, and the performance of Fujifilm manufacturers in recent years is obvious to all, although Fujifilm has high color saturation. But in the past few years, Fuji has not heard from S2, S3, S5, ...... since

If you buy it for tourism. Then what I recommend for you is D90 (about 5300 yuan) + 24-70 (about 13000) + 10-24 (about 3600 Tenglong) There is no telephoto and ultra-telephoto in this configuration, there is a wide angle and an ultra-wide angle, which is very convenient for travel.

If it is used to make money** Then what I recommend for you is 550d 550d is known as the entry master of SLR cameras, the picture quality is not bad, 550d (about 4900 yuan) + 24-70 (9800) + 17-40 (about 5000) 17-40 lens is a wide-angle head suitable for shooting the sea and mountains and forests and other atmospheric** Increase tension If the location is not on the seaside, it is better to change to a 70-200 head Xiaobai Wide angle to ultra-wide angle Suitable for shooting blurred and dreamy exterior films.

If the landlord can pay more money, it is recommended to buy 5d2 In fact, the difference between the fuselage and the fuselage is actually very large.

My End hope it helps you.

It depends on what you're going to shoot, if you shoot wide angles and portraits well, if you shoot birds, you can't, if you're a novice, it's good to get 18-200, and after playing for a long time, you really know what kind of head you want, this is just a personal opinion, I hope it can help you.

It's better to be 17-50.

Fix the aperture!!

Don't think about going all over the world with one lens, the gains outweigh the losses, the coverage of the lens can be from a wide angle, a medium focus, a telephoto, and a fixed focus. That's not too much, that's all. Slowly, the kind of head that goes all over the world in imaging compromises the quality of imaging.

It's good to be a hang-up head, let's use it first, the key is to be able to give full play to its potential and shoot well.

Let's use the D90 sleeve, this Nikon sleeve is very practical in terms of focal length, and it is suitable for novices who are familiar with the camera.

If you have a better budget, you can add a Nikon 50 header specializing in single portraits, more than 700 yuan, so that you can have a large aperture. In addition, if you have a more generous budget, replace the sleeve with the Nikon 18-70 (50 can't be saved, this is one of Nikon's best cost-effective lenses, you will love it if you use it), if the budget is not enough, it is not a big problem not to change to the 18-70.

The lens of the auxiliary factory is generally not recommended for novices.

I use D90, and I also have the head of the Ascendant, which is worthy of its **, and the imaging is not bad. Apertures are also useful and can be used as macros.

The downside is that the focus is slower than the original.

Nothing to do with the lens. It's about technology. Comparatively, the Tamron 18-200 is a cost-effective head. And it takes into account a wide range of aspects. It's good to practice more, and the hand will be stable.

D90 with Tamron 18 200 is really aggrieved, this I tried my classmates, it's too doggy, sell it as soon as possible, at least you have to get 18 105, if the budget is more, it's 16 85 (upstairs says it's 18 85, Nikon doesn't have this focal length), you can also consider telephoto 70 300VR and so on in the future....

The most recommended is 16 85, I use it with d200, it has been very good, the full focal length imaging is good, many people evaluate it as a "quasi-bull head" and "bull head in the floating aperture".

This head is still out, it's not good, instead of buying 18-105, it's better to go directly to the head of 18-85, this is the hang-up head. When you go out to play and use the telephoto, you can match it with a 70-300 one, which is just right, and it will be in place in one step.

If you have a blurry problem with 18-200 shooting, it should be because your handheld skills are still too poor, and you can play handheld for a few months, under the safe shutter, the 200 end will be fine, rest assured. It has nothing to do with the camera. The problem with your hands.

It depends on what you shoot, and I think it's better to fix the focus in the studio.

It seems that you want to go all over the world in one shot! If you don't take the picture quality too seriously, you can consider it, but it is not recommended that you match this large zoom ratio head, if you want to match, you can consider the original 18-105, this is still good, very convenient, the picture quality is also OK, many of my D90 friends around me are using it, and the reputation is very good! People like the kind of people who go all over the world in one shot will definitely be disappointed!

It's not as good as you expected, it's still the original! It won't leave you with too much of a gap in your heart!

Yes, that's right! Or with the original lens 18-105mm or 18-200mm

Recommend a digital online shopping** 365 days to buy, **licensed, national warranty,**affordable. Hope it helps.

The so-called one scene to go all over the world is this kind of full focal length. Although in principle it is good, one head can include all focal lengths and shoot any detail.

However, because this kind of full-focal length lens generally has poor imaging ability, that is, poor image quality, more people pursue the use of lenses with a shorter focal length because the imaging is better.

Why is it said that SLR is a money-burner, because it needs to be constantly replaced, if a lens really exists in the world, then is SLR still terrible?

I recommend you to go on Sigma 10-20, Tamron A16+A001Such a combination is cool!

Sigma 10-20 imaging is better than 10-20, Tamron A16 imaging is better than B005, although these 2 are old, but you can compare, I have seen the comparison on a foreign ** before, you can search for it yourself. The biggest disadvantage of the A001 is that there is no image stabilization, no ultrasonic motor, and the image is very sharp. XZP is too expensive, XLP is enough...

Get another Nikon 35 These are bargains, but the quality is good. Some items even go beyond the original.

Make up the ** and compare it yourself.

The quality of these two heads of Tenglong is good, and the focal length covers all directions, plus that constant aperture, as a deputy head is very cost-effective, it is worth buying.

Yes, basically all the scenes can be filmed.

It is recommended to go to D90, with Tamron 17 50 , 70 200, very good configuration, basically all scenes can be shot.

I think so, but it is recommended to choose Nikon D90 instead of Sony A580