Nikon D90 with 16 85 and 18 200 which is better 10

The 16-85 is good, second only to the 17-55 DX hang-up head.

18-200 is for those who don't know much about photography and want to make a single-lens reflex lens to go to the world market, the imaging is too ordinary.

Of course, these heads are far from the mirror emperor ratio of 24-70 or 28-70, **24-120 is very popular, and you can also pay attention to it.

18-200 is suitable for people who often travel on official business and should not bring too big and too ostentatious photography bags, and can achieve one shot to go all over the world. In fact, Nikon lenses are more realistic, and the quality is good.

The 16-85 has a wide angle equivalent to 24mm, which is equivalent to 24-127 for a full-frame lens, and it is enough for daily hang-up. This head is designed for people who are ready to go on the double head, the material is sufficient, the quality is good, it is said to be close to the level of 17-55 mirror emperor, it is also worth recommending, and it is just right to match a 70-200 above.

Depending on how you use the tour or 18-200

If you shoot a landscape sketch, it's still 1685

In terms of materials, 16-85 has 2 ED and three aspherical lenses, 18-105 has one each, and the number of ED and aspherical directly determines the level of image quality, the quality of purple edge and distortion control, etc., so although 16-85 is also a floating aperture DX format lens, but the materials, workmanship and image quality performance are a grade higher than 18-105. In addition, the 16-85 wide-angle end reaches 16mm, and the equivalent focal length is 24mm, which belongs to the ultra-wide-angle range, while the wide-angle end of the 18-105 is equivalent to 27mm, which is also a notch worse. The wider the angle end, the wider the view, the more impactful and expressive the picture will be.

Of course, although there is a price difference between 16-85 and 18-105, both are non-professional lenses, so you can't expect top-level performance in image quality, after all, the zoom heads of the three major grades are more than 10,000. For D90, 16-85 and 18-105 are very good matches, the key depends on your budget affordability and shooting needs, if you want to choose an affordable, excellent performance of the set, the budget is 7000-8000, then the D90 set is enough to meet the requirements, if the budget is around 10000, the pursuit of high image quality, and do not plan to carry a lot of prime lenses and separate wide-angle lenses (after all, good wide-angle is not cheap), 16-85 is the first choice.

D90+18-105 lens **7100, while 16-85 alone** more than 4,000! First of all, the 16-85 has a larger wide angle, finer workmanship, better optical design and lens glass, and is one of the best DX formats at present. The color of the 16-85 picture is better than the 18-105 in terms of color and sharpness, of course, more than 4,000 ** is also a bit of a suspicion of hype, but Nikon's good head is not cheap, and the good FX format lens is often tens of thousands!

But I think 16-85 is better than 18-105, but there are still more serious picture quality degradation at the edges, the picture is more deformed, and more than 4,000 is really not worth it! 18-105 hang-up is quite suitable. Simple landlords use the remaining funds to buy a 50 standard fixed focus (large aperture, good image quality, lightweight) or 35 or consider a telephoto.

In fact, telephoto is used a lot to shoot landscapes!

The standard sleeve is 18-105 and this set is about 7000

16-85 is better than 18-105 and of course more expensive

The list price is about 7100, which refers to the set of machines, and the lens with it is a dog head of 18 105! 16--85 is more expensive!

This isn't a medium telephoto, and lenses with a focal length that covers wide angles to telephoto are generally called "Tianya Lens" or "Big Zoom". A typical medium telephoto is something like the Nikon 70-300VR. Large zoom is more convenient, but image quality is not easy to do well.

At this level of 3000 yuan, the general picture quality is very bad. If after careful consideration, you really need it, then the new head 18-270 is naturally more suitable.

As for shopping, it is generally not recommended to buy sophisticated, valuable items, unless the store you plan to buy has a physical store not very far from your home (in the same city or a neighboring city) and has a good reputation. It's even better if there are sales recently. In this way, if something happens, you can go directly to the store to deal with it.

Added: Add a little bit of a view on the medium telephoto.

Medium telephoto here refers to 70-300 and the like, of course, there are also 70-200, 80-200, 80-400 and other large aperture bull heads and "long-range artillery", but the latter few are far more than the budget of 3000 yuan.

For example, the 70-200 segment of the original 730VR is very good, while the 100mm in the back is very bad, and the 730VC USD of Tamron is the opposite. As for Canon's 730L, its excellent image quality at full focal length comes at the cost of volume and **. But in any case, the overall image quality of the Nikon and Tamron 730 is still quite better than the aforementioned large zoom head.

If you are traveling, you generally need to match a standard variable head (focal length from wide angle to medium focus). Therefore, if you need to enter the medium telephoto lens, it is recommended to choose between Nikon original factory and Tamron.

The Nikon 70-300VR is recommended

Forget about Tallong's big zoom, hehe.

The new port licensed cargo is about 2900.

The picture quality is absolutely what you say, the ones you say are strong, sturdy and practical.

The image quality of the head that goes all over the world is not very good, so let's add some money to Tamron 70 200. After choosing a lens, the most important thing is to see if it runs out of focus It is recommended that it is best to go to a physical store to try the lens before deciding to buy it. It's still Jingdong and Amazon reliable, **too much moisture.

I don't know what you're shooting for, if there is an original plot, the medium telephoto is recommended on the Nikon AF-S VR 70-300mm F IF-ed Tamron 18-270 The head of the large zoom is indeed convenient, but the sacrifice is the image quality.

It's unreliable, the lens is not like clothes and shoes, I advise you, forget it, I never have to sell it!

I don't like to buy sophisticated things very much.

Nikon 18-200 is cost-effective, suitable for beginners to play, but quickly get tired of playing, Tamron still don't want it... I think it's okay.

Nikon lens focusing is a bit slow, I think Canon's lens is more cost-effective, the landlord can go to Canon's official website to see the lens suitable for his camera.