Can modern society rob the rich and help the poor ? 10

The kind of "robbing the rich and helping the poor" in the old society was absolutely not allowed. If you do it on your own, you will be punished by law. We can suggest that the relevant departments of the state should try their best to take care of the disadvantaged groups when carrying out the second distribution of society, and gradually narrow the gap between the rich and the poor.

Yes, it's best to do it behind the scenes, but you don't know what to do, because you haven't reached this strength at the moment, and the people will remember your benefits.

Theoretically, it is possible for a lawyer to be possible.

It is theoretically possible to give benefits to those who are being exploited through legal means.

But it's hard to do that, and it's hard for me to think of anything else, "robbing the rich and giving to the poor" outside of the law

OK. You can lead your villagers to revolt.

As long as you don't break the law.

No. Not allowed by law. Robbery, how can it.

Not necessarily, there are many ways to explain "robbing the rich and helping the poor". The key depends on how to "rob". If it is really in a stable society, like the behavior of those green forest heroes in the past, it may be a crime.

But if "robbery" does not refer to violence, such as a high tax policy for high-income people, it can also be described as "killing the rich and helping the poor", it is not a crime. The third point is that in the revolutionary period, it cannot be said to be a crime.

Yes. Because I don't know where the wealth comes from.

What is the basis for the law?

There is always a return to the field to pay back", just a lyric, the right to be entertainment, don't be distracted, if you take it seriously, then you are really stupid.

A lot of chicken soup for the soul is poisonous. Especially in this information ** era, poisonous chicken soup is everywhere.

Always remember that giving is only a necessary condition for reward, not a sufficiency.

Whether you can get a return depends on whether you pay, and whether you surpass the efforts of others.

If you don't give much less than others, then the limited resources will still not be allocated to you, and you will probably have to take some of it.

Competitiveness determines the rate of return, and there is nothing wrong with this statement.

If you are poor, I will plunder you again; If you are rich, I will give it to you again.

Robbing the poor and helping the rich, cruel, right? Even if it is cruel, it can still be seen everywhere and can happen at any time.

In a sense, the poor give everything, but they are still crushed by the strong of the rich, lack of competitiveness, and are naturally plundered!

Emaciated camels are bigger than horses! A coolie sells to worry about Wang Jianlin's debts, who do you say is not sick Li Zhichunxin?

What exists makes sense, and many people can't see through this truth, but then again, what can you do if you understand it? Still can't change.

But there's one thing: you can't change the world, at least you can change yourself!

In costume TV series, there are always chivalrous scenes of robbing the rich and helping the poor.

Most people take it for granted that this is a righteous thing.

However, ask yourself, as a melon-eating mass who has nothing to do with this, do you really think this is a good thing to accumulate good deeds?

I'm afraid not!

For the poor people who were often oppressed and exploited by the local squires and local parents, someone fell from the sky to solve their embarrassment for a period of time.

The people are grateful to their benefactors, and in a sense, they are understandable and understandable.

However, have you ever thought about the family of the rich who have been robbed?

The fact that a self-made rich man can live a privileged life is in itself a testament to his superiority. (Children who inherit family property are not included).

If such people have obtained wealth by improper and unjust means, then it is understandable that they will be robbed of the rich to help the poor.

Of course, this does not mean that the act of robbing the rich and giving to the poor is inherently correct.

You yourself are financially well-off and want to help others who are not as good as you.

That's a good thing. No one can say that it is not coming.

But the problem is, not all big families are bad people!

Such people are taken by themselves without asking, and the so-called heroes still borrow flowers to offer Buddha in the name of saving the poor people, how can they say it!

In the end, the heroes ended up with a good reputation.

And the real "victims" not only lost the economy, but were also thought by others that they deserved it!

In this way, aren't they wronged?

The reason why many people think that robbing the rich and helping the poor is a righteous act is nothing more than that they think that the rich are not bad for money anyway, and it is a heinous crime not to save the poor people!

Anyway, he doesn't have any losses, so of course the rich man should leak his money.

Sour, this is real lemon extract!

It doesn't matter what you can't do, what matters is that you can't do it yourself, but you are too demanding on others.

The most typical example is the coronavirus incident for a while.

Many people donate money and materials, but some people don't donate anything, but their mouths don't stop.

I also dislike that people who get tens of millions of dollars are too selfish and stingy, and they are only willing to donate hundreds of thousands.

Please, when you say this, did you donate?

Keyboard Man, doesn't your conscience hurt?

You know, more money and less money are all one mind!

If everyone is like this, what is the future of the development of a great country?

You have a lot of money, so you should donate to death!

Isn't this a moral kidnapping in a garb of luxury?

The key is that there are still many people who like this!

I can't stand it.

If you really want to rob the rich and help the poor, you will rob the wealth of the bad people! So that the guilt is not so great, because it's called fighting evil with evil. How to help the poor? Look at the money to donate to Tzu Chi. Red Cross Society. It's still an orphanage!!

China has not had a real national policy since ancient times, so it took the national national policy that was said before, advocating the only child, and the people responded to the call! You are looking at the fact that the only child has been canceled and a second child is allowed, how big a gap there is between this back and forth! This is our so-called national policy, that is, it is always the common people who can change their bad luck at any time!

This one seems to be a bit bad, criminal. For those who are poor, there should be a donation method to help the poor.

The fifth episode of Wulin Gaiden, thank you.

?World Impact 8 Author Controversy.

Mountain line (Du Mu) Qingming (Du Mu).

Yin Qian's "Yin Qian: Walking to the West" insults the people of Shanxi: "Obviously, the screenwriter and director of "Walking to the West" are not responsible for this historical TV series, they are estranged from the past history, and they are unfamiliar with the low-level people who "went to the West" in the past, and many "incredible" characters have been produced under their "efforts".

Liu Yidao, the bandit leader who killed people and set fires and bullied men and women, turned out to be a benevolent and righteous man who loved the rich and helped the poor; The protagonist Tian Qing is purely a "feminine" and creamy little girl, without the slightest masculinity; Tian Yaozu looks like a traitor no matter how he looks at it, which is very different from the real characters in the play; Is Carpenter Xu the image of a revolutionary righteous man? No, no matter how you look at it, it looks like a speculative second-class dealer; Especially Liang Manchu, a character who has been portrayed as a stupid libaji, greedy for life and afraid of death, mercenary, even if I give 10,000 reasons, I can't see that he is like a tough guy in Shanxi who goes south and north, including Wang Pumpkin and stupid big man, these three people are just three fools with different appearances; The play not only deprives them of the right to be a very simple fool, but also solemnly asks these fools to bear the corresponding responsibility, which is really a strange thing, to put it bluntly, this is an insult to the people of Shanxi. ”

Robbing the rich and helping the poor is a positive word and verb that refers to seizing the wealth of the rich and helping the poor. robbery: forcible seizure; Ji: relief, used as a predicate, definite, object.