If you want to buy a camera, Canon IXUS 105, Nikon s6000 and Canon IXUS 210, please give some advice

I just bought the Nikon S6000 and I think it's okay! Anyway, it's just this and that, haha.

I can't give you a specific answer, which one to choose, it depends on what you value more, **, shape, size, pixel height, etc. The performance and imaging quality of this kind of machine are not much worse, the pixel level only determines the size of the enlargement, and it is not much worse, I hope it will help you! Reference.

It must be a Canon 210, with fast focusing, good color reproduction, practical focal length, and advanced processor. Large display size.

ixus220hs 115hs The night mode of these two models is stronger, the picture quality is the same for both, and the workmanship 220 is better.

IXUS220HS is recommended

If you are using it for night scenes, then the picture quality of such a machine will definitely not be satisfactory. For night shooting, you need a machine like the Canon S100 or Nikon P7100.

If you are not in these two options, it is recommended to use 220hs, this kind of small card, the image sensor is very small, and the higher the pixel, the worse the image quality.

Canon bar! You won't regret it!

There are only 2 brands of DC products, which is good!

One Canon, one Sony!

Don't be fooled by some so-called parameters! Good film is the last word!

I own a photography shop.

There have been their own Canon ixus85 ixus100 ixus120 eos 400d eos 50d eos 7d

Casio Olympus Panasonic has also played with a few of his friends' Taiwan cards, and I will tell you very responsibly!

Whether it's the screen or the color reproduction, it's not a machine of the times!

The LCD screen has quite low pixels (relative to Canon), and it is completely inferior to Sony's WX series or Canon IXUS series, **I'm sorry** quality, and I can't see it when I shoot with this camera at night**!

It's true! Trust me and I'm not wrong!

Casio and Olympus's card machine screen display and night shooting are among the best (countdown)!

As for Nikon and Canon, they are not of the same era!

If you don't like the quality of Canon and Sony's cards, then you can consider buying a mirrorless or SLR!

A friend bought a Canon SX220 HS last month, which is pretty good! The color, sharpness, and screen display are all worthy of that**!

If you want an ultra-wide angle, look no further than the IXUS 220 HS, which has a large wide angle of 24mm! I'm no longer afraid that there will be too many people and I won't be able to shoot! It's also thin!

Or the Ixus 230 HS, the Ixus 310 HS is also good! This one with a shimmer mode meets the needs of night scenes!

The 28-392mm telephoto also meets your travel needs!

Sony hasn't played for a long time, but once I saw a customer playing a W350D is also good, and it's not bad to test a few shots, Sony cards generally have a panoramic mode! Love the scenery of this fun!

But since you already have a range of brands, choose the SX220 HS now!

The color is more favorable, and it will be relatively easy to make a move after a few years!

It is recommended that you don't buy the one that has been discontinued, and if you don't use it professionally, you don't need to buy it if you go out to travel and play, Sony's and Canon's are good, Sony's color sense is good, the picture is good, the body is exquisite, and the lens is okay, but the Canon lens is also very good, and the general Carl Zeiss lens is a little better.

The second floor is correct,Fuji's new F605 is also good,Compared with 505,605's uses an improved EXR engine,The effect of shooting night scenes is better,And it supports 30x super-resolution zoom。

It is recommended that you buy one and play it all over again

Some have been discontinued, it is recommended that you do not buy the discontinued ones, and if you are not professional, you just go out to travel and play, you don't need to buy too good Sony's and Canon's are good, Sony's color sense is good, the picture is good, the body is exquisite, and the lens is okay, but the Canon lens is also very good, and the general Carl Zeiss lens is a little better.

It is not recommended that the L120 is large in size and not prominent, and I am using the macro is not even stronger, and the card is still Canon.

If you have the money, buy both.

First, CCD, pixels. The indicators for both are similar. Nothing compares.

In fact, with a CCD of this size, to carry 1400W pixels, it is a bit unreliable, but it is just a selling point for merchants. But I use Canon myself, and Canon's lens imaging is really impeccable; Nikon's SLR machine is still good, but the card machine is not so professional;

Second, zoom. The IXUS210 is 5x optical, 4x digital, which is larger than the S6000's 7x optical and 2x digital, and the total magnification is larger, and the effect of zoom can be clearly felt;

Third, wide-angle (35mm focal length equivalent). IXUS210 is 24-120mm, S6000 is 28mm, less than or equal to 28mm has a wide-angle effect, the smaller the focal length, the better the wide-angle effect, therefore, the IXUS210's wide-angle is better.

Fourth, maximum aperture. ixus210is,S6000is,The maximum aperture is as big as possible,He determines the brightness and clarity of your**,This indicator is more critical,It's also easier to ignore。

Fifth, appearance. The Canon is much better looking, and his industrial design is top-notch.

Sixth, touch screen. In fact, this technology is very mature, and it is not so easy to break, but the screen is large, and it is a bit power-consuming.

Having said all that, I will conclude that for us average users, both machines are fine, and if you really want to compare, it is better than Canon. In fact, it is unnecessary to list so many parameters, for example, zoom, pixels, etc., are just the selling points of the business, the key to using the camera, the key is to see how the photo is done, whether the image is good or not, this is the most important thing. Personally, I think Canon's imaging is better.

It's all personal opinions, and I played for a long time, hoping it will help you a little.

The ixus210 is a point-and-shoot machine.

Advertising is done a lot, but I personally feel that there is no play, and I will get tired of it for a while.

Nikon S6000 is a semi-point-and-shoot machine, with more features, mainly because its CCD is much higher, about 3 times that of the ixus210, and the picture quality and details will be good.

Both are not as good as Canon SX210 This is the top machine in the card machine, it supports full manual, and there is no difference in function from SLR, if you want to learn photography in advance, choose it. In terms of performance, it beats the above two.

Don't look at Sony, the camera is better than Canon and Nikon, Canon is the king in the card machine, and Nikon has a comparison with it on SLR.

I do photography. However, it is a DSLR. I've always loved n's. Generally, Canon's are used in smaller photo studios or studios. Canon's colors are gentle. It's easier to fix.

Nikon's colors are sharp. It's very feeling.

I haven't had much contact with consumer machines before. I don't know much. However, I just bought a Nikon S6000 for my sister some time agoThe effect is still okay.

I still feel like it's Nikon. Colors are sharp.

Both machines are OK. It was a favorite color of the individual. You can go to the mall and compare the two models.

Hope it helps you a little.

Sony's style is flashy.,Canon can only say it's okay.,After all, sales are the first.,But the appearance is really not good-looking.。。。 Nikon is very stable, there are not a lot of flashy and useless features, but the quality is definitely above the first two!

I use the S6000The price is 2200, including a lot of freebies...

This time I went to Shanghai Expo to travel and used it to shoot quite well! The colors are not as vivid as the Canon, they are more realistic, the operation is easy to use, and it is much more convenient than a full touch screen.

Personally, I don't think there is a need to pursue a full touch screen for a camera, after all, it's not an electronic product like a mobile phone that never leaves your hand every day...

Let's put quality first!

So I think the S6000 is pretty good!

Nikon Canon is about the same price/performance ratio. If I recommend it, it's Nikon's.

If you like a stylish look, go for Canon. To be honest, the Canon IXUS 210 is about the same as the Panasonic FX65 I bought. The FX65 can be obtained for as little as 1500.

The key to what camera to buy depends on what your main purpose is.

First of all, I want to explain to you that Canon's camera is very solid, and you don't have to worry about its touch screen going wrong easily.

If you're a girl,I advise you to give up buying Nikon,Unless you're proficient in PS,Nikon's unique yellow will make you can't help but delete the ** you just shot**,S6000Although the performance is not bad,But the display effect is poorixus210It's not a grade,The display screen is not happy, I believe you won't be happy to shoot**。

The ixus210 is really good to be honest, but this is what I thought before the ixus300 came out, the price is about the same, you can think about it, it is a more perfect portable camera.

If you like to shoot landscapes, especially night scenes, I believe his performance will not disappoint you, and the price is about the same.

The Canon Ixus series of machines is very mature and very good.

First of all, the answer ixus210 full touch screen is not so easy to break, our unit just bought one, bought online, less than two thousand Wu, I use it, I also feel that the effect is very good, much stronger than my ixus85. And then there is a price difference of several hundred between these two cameras, see if you have any ideas about **, as for Sony W350, I haven't used it, it's not clear, and don't say anything, but I still hope you buy ixus210, the last piece of advice is that you go to buy it in the digital city to see, give it a try, make a decision, and see which one you like the most, after all, each has its own advantages and disadvantages!

In terms of professional cameras, Nikon and Canon are both first-line brands, and they are not bad.

But home cameras, Nikon and Canon canon can't be compared in all aspects, it's not a comparison, it's not a grade, it's too much worse.

I sold cameras for a few years. Canon ixus210 is highly recommended!

Otherwise, when you buy, you will know if you get the two machines together and compare them!

Nikon's Canon has Jackie Chan endorsements...

Decisively Nikon does not explain.

I've been using the Ixus 210 for a while now, and my personal opinion to you is: Yes!

Let's tell you about the advantages and disadvantages in detail. Pros:1

The touch screen and appearance are very trendy, and you will definitely not lose points when you go out; 2.Large aperture, the effect at night is better than that of other card machines; 3.The mode is very playable, such as the fisheye mode, the micro mode, etc. are very good; 4.

It's very simple, easy to use, and the manual is basically useless (there is an electronic version of the detailed manual in the CD, which can still be seen); The file is good, which satisfies the mood of the average user who wants to do it manually! 6.It is very convenient to see on the camera**, you can change it by tapping left and right**, and the digic 4 image processing system used can be processed on the camera in the later stage; 7.

It's easy to see the detailed parameters of your own photos; 8.There are more photo modes provided, which are basically enough for home use.

There are still shortcomings:1Light leakage, although I don't affect the ** effect, but I am still very unhappy; 2.

The ** that comes out looks good on the camera, but it is lighter on the computer, and of course the post-processing has become easier; 3.Since it is a wide-angle camera, it only has a 5x light change, and if you want to take a long shot (when traveling), then this machine may not make you very satisfied, of course, telephoto and wide angle are generally not both; 4.The stabilization performance is average, so you need to pay attention and practice more.

By the way, I would like to remind you: the battery must be paid attention to, and many merchants have transferred the original package.

In fact, Panasonic has a ZS7GK is still good, 12x light change and full field wide angle, it is a good combination of telephoto and wide angle card, of course**slightly more expensive than 210, but it is also around 2000. If you want to see the ** effect of 210, you can leave me a message, and I'll send it to you to see!

Litter. That's what I use. Imaging blurry. I want to wax the same.

The card camera Nikon S6200 is a little better first.

Canon has a slightly lower camera ratio in card cameras, Nikon lenses are slightly better, easy to maintain, cheap accessories, and mainly cost-effective.

The 6200 is better, the light changes to be larger, the wide angle is larger, the picture is more transparent, and the colors are more vivid.

Canon IXUS 115HS, ** is not expensive, small and stylish in appearance, relatively low-end, known for its small and sophisticated, and the boxy body looks simple and stylish. Canon's imaging effect and reputation are relatively good, and this can be said to be the most cost-effective one among Canon cameras. It is also Canon's most popular camera at present.

The reference price of licensed goods is about 1500.