I have seen Han Han s A City .

In fact, the current Han Han is really powerful, "A City" is a very good proof, through simple love, simple jokes, but how much social darkness and dissatisfaction are expressed, and it is no longer the previous net complaint.

There is a taste of black humor, and it will be sad only after laughing!

Han Han's things are like this, like "Triple Gate", etc., maybe someone who has the same experience as her will understand!!

There is no place on the Internet.

I've seen this kid all blogs, and it's not a big deal.

I think the protagonist must be sleepwalking.

Very unreal written.

Agree. I always feel that there is a sense of being divided into two with the above, and the ending is very abrupt; Actually, I think I have this feeling when I watch the end of the Chang'an chaos, as if I don't know how to end, what will happen next, maybe he can't say it (just my personal guess).

That's what Han Han's stuff looks like.

The ending is always a topic of conversation.

Some people say it's empty.

Some people say subtle.

Some people say it's wonderful.

Actually, I think it's okay.

I can't write it anyway.

Hehe, I conceded.

Han Han's article should be more emphasis on the text and less on the plot, so don't think too much.

Feel for yourself! Let me look at it again and feel the !!

Han Han's writing is to follow his thinking. Think of it, write there! There is no need to sum up your thinking and write an ending! The soul of each book follows the next. Never broken.

I feel the same way, and I'll get back to you when I read it again.

Anyway, I felt a little bit when I watched it for the first time, but it wasn't clear enough, so I watched it a few more times to see how it felt.

Agree with you, but, not nonsensical.

In writing, a question usually arises about "hurdles". Generally speaking, the appearance of "kan" comes in 1 3 places, 1 2 places, and 2 3 places. The appearance of "Kan" is mainly due to the author's problems in the connection between the follow-up ideas and the previous plot in the process of writing the article.

I've read it, and it is estimated that the author has a hurdle before and after, and he is very irritable (which can be seen from the later article). In order to achieve self-breakthrough, the author may have read modern Western literary works and is ready to absorb their nutrients, therefore, there are many imagery words in the later works, which makes it impossible for us to continue reading according to the ideas of the first half, resulting in an artificial tear in the work. This, of course, is the failure of the work.